Rectification methods comparison for the ASTER GDEM V2 data using the ICESat/GLA14 data in the Lvliang mountains, China

被引:9
|
作者
Zhao, Shangmin [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Cheng, Weiming [2 ,4 ]
Liu, Haijiang [3 ]
He, Weican [1 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Dept Surveying & Mapping, Coll Min Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] China Natl Environm Monitoring Ctr, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Ctr Collaborat Innovat Geog Informat Reso, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ASTER GDEM V2 data; ICESat/GLA14; data; Rectification method; GCP data; RMSE; Lvliang Mountains; SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHODS; DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS; HIGH-ACCURACY; SRTM DEM; VERTICAL ACCURACY; LEVEL CHANGES; TANDEM-X; INDIA; PERFORMANCE; JHARKHAND;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-015-4614-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
ASTER GDEM data have high spatial resolution and wide coverage, which are significant in topographic analysis and geographic study. ICESat/GLA14 data can improve the vertical accuracy of ASTER GDEM data based on its abundant points with high vertical accuracy. It is essential to seek a proper rectification method for ASTER GDEM data. In this research, taking the Lvliang Mountains of China as the study area, proper rectification method is explored for the latest version of the ASTER GDEM data (ASTER GDEM V2 data). The ICESat/GLA14 data are regarded as the real data, so the difference between the two datasets is the vertical error data. The key to rectify the ASTER GDEM V2 data is to seek an appropriate interpolation method to simulate a proper surface for the vertical error data. Through analysis and comparison, four interpolation methods including inverse distance weighted (IDW) method, ordinary kriging (OK) method, simple kriging (SK) method and universal kriging (UK) method are first chosen from numerous interpolation methods. Through comparing the vertical error histograms, the samples and the characteristics of the four interpolation methods, the ICESat/GLA14 data in 2005 are selected as the benchmark to rectify the ASTER GDEM V2 data. Then, the vertical error data are calculated using the difference value between the ASTER GDEM V2 data and the ICESat/GLA14 data. Under optimal configuration the vertical error, the chosen four interpolation methods are used to simulate the surface of the vertical error data. Finally, the rectified results for ASTER GDEM V2 data are achieved by adding the interpolated results to the ASTER GDEM V2 data, and the accuracy of the rectified results is appraised using the ground control points on the topographic maps. The research results show that (1) Accuracy of the rectified results is different by using various interpolation methods. The RMSE value range for all the rectified results is 19.5-26.7 m. (2) Among the four methods, SK is the best; the next are OK and UK methods, which have approximately similar performance, but the UK method is a little worse; on the whole, the IDW method has the worst performance. (3) This research not only provides the optimal parameters for different interpolation methods, but also obtains the appropriate rectification method for ASTER GDEM V2 data using ICESat/GLA14 data, which is beneficial for broader range of applications using ASTER GDEM V2 data in topographic and geographic research.
引用
收藏
页码:6571 / 6590
页数:20
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Rectification methods comparison for the ASTER GDEM V2 data using the ICESat/GLA14 data in the Lvliang mountains, China
    Shangmin Zhao
    Li Wang
    Weiming Cheng
    Haijiang Liu
    Weican He
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74 : 6571 - 6590
  • [2] Comparation to the Methods of Interpolation with ASTER GDEM V2 Based on ICESat/GLA14 Lvliang Mountains in Shanxi Province
    He, Dongcai
    Wang, Li
    Gao, Baolu
    Xu, Chengwu
    Chen, Junjie
    IAEDS15: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN APPLIED ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 46 : 721 - 726
  • [3] Using MLR to model the vertical error distribution of ASTER GDEM V2 data based on ICESat/GLA14 data in the Loess Plateau of China
    Zhao, Shangmin
    Cheng, Weiming
    Zhou, Chenghu
    Liu, Haijiang
    Su, Qiaomei
    Zhang, Shifang
    He, Weican
    Wang, Li
    Wu, Wenjiao
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEOMORPHOLOGIE, 2017, 61 : 9 - 26
  • [4] Accuracy assessment of SRTM v4 and ASTER GDEM v2 over the Altiplano watershed using ICESat/GLAS data
    Satge, F.
    Bonnet, M. P.
    Timouk, F.
    Calmant, S.
    Pillco, R.
    Molina, J.
    Lavado-Casimiro, W.
    Arsen, A.
    Cretaux, J. F.
    Garnier, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 36 (02) : 465 - 488
  • [5] Elevation Accuracy Evaluation and Correction of ASTER GDEM in China Southeast Hilly Region by Combining ICESat-2 and GEDI data
    Jiao H.
    Chen C.
    Huang H.
    Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2023, 25 (02) : 409 - 420
  • [6] Evaluation of ASTER GDEM2 in Comparison with GDEM1, SRTM DEM and Topographic-Map-Derived DEM Using Inundation Area Analysis and RTK-dGPS Data
    Suwandana, Endan
    Kawamura, Kensuke
    Sakuno, Yuji
    Kustiyanto, Eko
    Raharjo, Beni
    REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 4 (08): : 2419 - 2431
  • [7] A Comparison and Review of Surface Detection Methods Using MBL, MABEL, and ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Laser Altimetry Data
    Xie, Huan
    Xu, Qi
    Ye, Dan
    Jia, Jianghao
    Sun, Yuan
    Huang, Peiqi
    Li, Ming
    Liu, Shijie
    Xie, Feng
    Hao, Xiaolong
    Tong, Xiaohua
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 14 : 7604 - 7623
  • [8] Comparison of free high resolution digital elevation data sets (ASTER GDEM2, SRTM v2.1/v4.1) and validation against accurate heights from the Australian National Gravity Database
    Rexer, M.
    Hirt, C.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 61 (02) : 213 - 226
  • [9] Comparison of five methods for improving the accuracy of SRTM3 DEM and TanDEM-X DEM in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau using ICESat-2 data
    Xu, Weifeng
    Li, Jun
    Peng, Dailiang
    Jiang, Jinge
    Xia, Hongxuan
    Wen, Di
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2024, 17 (01)