Primary Cryosurgery for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer - Do Perioperative Tumor Characteristics Correlate With Post-treatment Biopsy Results?

被引:5
|
作者
Sverrisson, E. F. [1 ]
Nguyen, H. [1 ]
Kim, T. [1 ]
Pow-Sang, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Genitourinary Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
HIGH-RISK; OUTCOMES; CRYOABLATION; ABLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2013.10.018
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate the rate and predictive factors of positive post-treatment biopsy in men treated with primary cryosurgery for localized prostate cancer. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all patients treated with primary cryosurgery at a single institution between 1999 and 2012. Perioperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, Gleason score, and number of positive preoperative biopsy cores were obtained and correlated with postoperative biopsy results. Patients were stratified according to the risk classification system of D'Amico to low-, intermediate-, or high-risk groups. RESULTS Sixty-five men were treated with primary cryosurgery, and 57 of 65 (88%) of them underwent postoperative biopsy on average 9 months after the treatment. Eleven of 57 patients (19%) were found to have persistent tumor on post-treatment biopsy. Men who had positive biopsy had significantly higher perioperative PSA levels than men who had negative biopsy (preoperative PSA 12.5 vs 6.2, P = .002; post-operative PSA nadir 4.3 vs 0.71, P = .005); however, no independent predictor was found on a multivariate analysis. Gleason score and number of positive preoperative biopsy cores did not predict tumor persistence. Positive biopsy results were found more often in the intermediate-and high-risk patients, although this was not statistically significant (low risk 9%, intermediate risk 20%, and high risk 27%). CONCLUSION Perioperative PSA levels, Gleason score, or number of positive pretreatment biopsy cores do not predict failure after primary cryosurgery for clinically localized prostate cancer. Our findings suggest that physicians, who offer primary cryosurgery to patients with localized prostate cancer, should consider offering post-treatment biopsy to patients to assure adequate cancer control. UROLOGY 83: 376-378, 2014. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 378
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE ROLE OF PROSTATE BIOPSY AFTER SALVAGE CRYOSURGERY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Sverrisson, Einar
    Huy Nguyen
    Kim, Timothy
    Pow-Sang, Julio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E495 - E496
  • [2] Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Lian, Huibo
    Guo, Hongqian
    Gan, Weidong
    Li, Xiaogong
    Yan, Xiang
    Wang, Wei
    Yang, Rong
    Qu, Feng
    Ji, Changwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 43 (04) : 1089 - 1094
  • [3] Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Huibo Lian
    Hongqian Guo
    Weidong Gan
    Xiaogong Li
    Xiang Yan
    Wei Wang
    Rong Yang
    Feng Qu
    Changwei Ji
    [J]. International Urology and Nephrology, 2011, 43 : 1089 - 1094
  • [4] Five year outcomes of PSA and biopsy following cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer
    Cohen, JK
    Miller, R
    Benoit, R
    Rooker, G
    Merlotti, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 252 - 252
  • [5] Focal cryosurgery followed by penile rehabilitation as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: Initial results
    Ellis, David S.
    Manny, Theodore B., Jr.
    Rewcastle, John C.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (6A) : 9 - 15
  • [6] Cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: A community hospital experience
    Ellis, DS
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (2A) : 34 - 39
  • [7] Higher SBRT Dose Levels for Localized Prostate Cancer Are Associated with Improved Post-treatment Biopsy Outcomes
    Zelefsky, M. J.
    Pinitpatcharalert, A.
    Goldman, D. A.
    Kollmeier, M. A.
    Hopkins, M.
    McBride, S.
    Gorovets, D., Jr.
    Happersett, L.
    Zhang, Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E882 - E882
  • [8] The effect of prostate biopsy timing on staging by prostate MRI in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Cho, Soung Yong
    Cho, Kang Su
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Hong, Sung Joon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 247 - 247
  • [9] Superior Post-Treatment Biopsy Outcomes with High Dose SBRT Compared to High-Dose Conventionally Fractionated IMRT for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Zelefsky, M. J.
    Kollmeier, M. A.
    White, C.
    Zhang, Z.
    Reuter, V.
    Ehdaie, B.
    Moore, A.
    Samson, F.
    Gorovets, D.
    Damato, A. L.
    Elsayegh, A.
    McBride, S. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : S92 - S92
  • [10] DO PROSTATE BIOPSY-ASSOCIATED COMPLICATIONS INFLUENCE TREATMENT SELECTION FOR PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED, CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER?
    Adamsky, Melanie
    Tallman, Jacob
    Kuchta, Kristine
    Helfand, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E553 - E554