Actors mapping tool for action: the Tacuarembo Rural Development Board experience

被引:0
|
作者
Figari, M. [1 ]
Pereira, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Minist Ganaderia Agr & Pesca, Div Promoc & Gest Desarrollo Terr, Direcc Gen Desarrollo Rural, Tacuarembo, Uruguay
来源
AGROCIENCIA-URUGUAY | 2020年 / 24卷
关键词
communication; rural development; participation;
D O I
10.31285/AGRO.24.349
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The experience presented in this article is part of the strengthening work of the Rural Development Board (MDR) of Tacuarembo (Uruguay), one of the actions through which the "institutional relationship" dimension was approached. The hypothesis was that any progress in terms of Rural Development implies, among other things, the recognition of the actors present in the territory, the type of relationship that exists with them, and the predisposition to address problems jointly. The objective was to analyze the scenario where the MDR Tacuarembo acts, seeking to identify which actors are present, which contribute most to the achievement of their objectives, how are the links with each one, what difficulties or relationship problems exist, and what actions can be implemented to improve and strengthen existing links and create new ones. The participatory mapping technique of actors was applied using a poster distributed in quadrants to distinguish the "type of actor" (political, technical, social and economic) and to characterize the type of link lines and arrows were used, with a symbology previously agreed. The analysis of the map allowed the development of a short, medium and long-term action plan, aimed at establishing and/or strengthening links with key actors, executed by the MDR participants themselves. It was identified that MDR interacts with a large number of actors, which represents an advantage, but few links were found with socio-cultural actors, a limitation to overcome in order to strengthen the innovation capacities of local actors.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Local Action Groups - Key Actors of the Rural Development
    Popa , Alina Mariana P.
    Stanciu , Mihaela Felicia G.
    Turek Rahoveanu, Adrian
    VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2018, : 4995 - 5001
  • [2] Barriers for and standpoints of key actors in the implementation of smart village projects as a tool for the development of rural areas
    Hlavacek, Petr
    Kopacek, Miroslav
    Kopackova, Lucie
    Hruska, Vladan
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2023, 103
  • [3] THE ACTORS INVOLVED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RURAL TOURISM IN ROMANIA
    Paiu, Maria Cristina
    VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, AND GLOBAL GROWTH, VOLS I-IX, 2017, 2017, : 4922 - 4925
  • [4] INTRODUCTION OF SYNERGIC MODEL OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACTORS
    Svobodova, Hana
    Chabicovska, Katerina
    13TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2010, : 239 - 245
  • [5] Information as a key tool for rural development. 25 years of experience in Spains
    Diaz-Puente, Jose M.
    Gallego, Francisco J.
    Vidueira, Pablo
    Rocco-Aguilera, Antonella
    4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES (WCES-2012), 2012, 46 : 1208 - 1212
  • [6] RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY - A PERSPECTIVE OF LOCAL ACTORS IN SERBIA
    Papic, Ruzica
    Bogdanov, Natalija
    EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2015, 62 (04): : 1079 - 1093
  • [7] IDENTIFYING COMMUNITY POWER ACTORS FOR RURAL-DEVELOPMENT
    TAIT, JL
    JOHNSON, AH
    BOKEMEIER, JL
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 1978, 33 (06) : 270 - 273
  • [8] European Integration and Rural Development: Actors, Institutions and Power
    Juntti, Meri
    TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 2016, 87 (01): : 107 - 108
  • [9] European Integration and Rural Development: Actors, Institutions and Power
    Osmane, Sarah
    RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2016, 81 (01) : 137 - 139
  • [10] European integration and rural development: actors, institutions and power
    Hawes, Derek
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN STUDIES, 2016, 24 (02) : 308 - 309