A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers

被引:768
|
作者
Oliver, Kathryn [1 ]
Innvar, Simon [2 ]
Lorenc, Theo [3 ]
Woodman, Jenny [4 ]
Thomas, James [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Oslo Univ Coll, Fac Social Sci, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
[3] UCL, Dept Sci Technol Engn & Publ Policy UCL STEaPP, London WC1E 6EA, England
[4] Inst Child Hlth, MRC, Ctr Epidemiol Child Hlth, London WC1N 1EH, England
[5] Univ London, Inst Educ, London WC1H 0AL, England
来源
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
HEALTH-POLICY; PUBLIC-HEALTH; DECISION-MAKING; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; MIXED-METHODS; STATE; INFORMATION; RESEARCHERS; COUNTRIES; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-14-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The gap between research and practice or policy is often described as a problem. To identify new barriers of and facilitators to the use of evidence by policymakers, and assess the state of research in this area, we updated a systematic review. Methods: Systematic review. We searched online databases including Medline, Embase, SocSci Abstracts, CDS, DARE, Psychlit, Cochrane Library, NHSEED, HTA, PAIS, IBSS (Search dates: July 2000 -September 2012). Studies were included if they were primary research or systematic reviews about factors affecting the use of evidence in policy. Studies were coded to extract data on methods, topic, focus, results and population. Results: 145 new studies were identified, of which over half were published after 2010. Thirteen systematic reviews were included. Compared with the original review, a much wider range of policy topics was found. Although still primarily in the health field, studies were also drawn from criminal justice, traffic policy, drug policy, and partnership working. The most frequently reported barriers to evidence uptake were poor access to good quality relevant research, and lack of timely research output. The most frequently reported facilitators were collaboration between researchers and policymakers, and improved relationships and skills. There is an increasing amount of research into new models of knowledge transfer, and evaluations of interventions such as knowledge brokerage. Conclusions: Timely access to good quality and relevant research evidence, collaborations with policymakers and relationship-and skills-building with policymakers are reported to be the most important factors in influencing the use of evidence. Although investigations into the use of evidence have spread beyond the health field and into more countries, the main barriers and facilitators remained the same as in the earlier review. Few studies provide clear definitions of policy, evidence or policymaker. Nor are empirical data about policy processes or implementation of policy widely available. It is therefore difficult to describe the role of evidence and other factors influencing policy. Future research and policy priorities should aim to illuminate these concepts and processes, target the factors identified in this review, and consider new methods of overcoming the barriers described.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers
    Kathryn Oliver
    Simon Innvar
    Theo Lorenc
    Jenny Woodman
    James Thomas
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [2] Barriers and facilitators to evidence-use in program management: a systematic review of the literature
    Humphries, Serena
    Stafinski, Tania
    Mumtaz, Zubia
    Menon, Devidas
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [3] Barriers and facilitators to evidence-use in program management: a systematic review of the literature
    Serena Humphries
    Tania Stafinski
    Zubia Mumtaz
    Devidas Menon
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [4] A BARRIERS TO AND FACILITATORS OF THE USE OF HTA REPORTS BY POLICYMAKERS IN KAZAKHSTAN
    Kostyuk, A.
    Akanov, A.
    Nurgozhin, T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A833 - A833
  • [5] Prescriber and institutional barriers and facilitators of clozapine use: A systematic review
    Verdoux, Helene
    Quiles, Clelia
    Bachmann, Christian J.
    Siskind, Dan
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2018, 201 : 10 - 19
  • [6] Facilitators and barriers to condom use among Filipinos: A systematic review of literature
    De Torres, Ryan Q.
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 10 (04): : 306 - 315
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to discontinuing antidepressant use: A systematic review and thematic synthesis
    Maund, Emma
    Dewar-Haggart, Rachel
    Williams, Samantha
    Bowers, Hannah
    Geraghty, Adam W. A.
    Leydon, Geraldine
    May, Carl
    Dawson, Sarah
    Kendrick, Tony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 245 : 38 - 62
  • [8] The Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Lifestyle Apps: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
    Shabir, Habiba
    D'Costa, Matthew
    Mohiaddin, Zain
    Moti, Zaeem
    Rashid, Hamza
    Sadowska, Daria
    Alam, Benyamin
    Cox, Benita
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 2022, 12 (02) : 144 - 165
  • [9] Policymakers' perceived barriers and facilitators in the use of research evidence in oral health policies and guidelines: a qualitative study protocol
    Verdugo-Paiva, Francisca
    Bonfill, Xavier
    Ortuno, Duniel
    Glick, Michael
    Carrasco-Labra, Alonso
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [10] A systematic review of the clinician related barriers and facilitators to the use of evidence-informed interventions for post traumatic stress
    Finch, Jodie
    Ford, Catherine
    Grainger, Lauren
    Meiser-Stedman, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2020, 263 : 175 - 186