Regional differences of the ionospheric response to the July 2012 geomagnetic storm

被引:24
|
作者
Kuai, Jiawei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Libo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lei, Jiuhou [4 ]
Liu, Jing [5 ]
Zhao, Biqiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Yiding [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Le, Huijun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yungang [6 ]
Hu, Lianhuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Key Lab Earth & Planetary Phys, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing Natl Observ Space Environm, Inst Geol & Geophys, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Earth Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, CAS Key Lab Geospace Environm, Hefei, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, High Altitude Observ, Pob 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
[6] China Meteorol Adm, Key Lab Space Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
TOTAL ELECTRON-CONTENT; OCTOBER; 2003; SUPERSTORMS; LOW-LATITUDE IONOSPHERE; MAGNETIC STORM; EQUATORIAL IONOSPHERE; BOTTOMSIDE IONOSPHERE; DISTURBANCE DYNAMO; THERMOSPHERE; DENSITY; TOPSIDE;
D O I
10.1002/2016JA023844
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The July 2012 geomagnetic storm is an extreme space weather event in solar cycle 24, which is characterized by a southward interplanetary geomagnetic field lasting for about 30 h below -10 nT. In this work, multiple instrumental observations, including electron density from ionosondes, total electron content (TEC) from Global Positioning System, Jason-2, and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, and the topside ion concentration observed by the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program spacecraft are used to comprehensively present the regional differences of the ionospheric response to this event. In the Asian-Australian sector, an intensive negative storm is detected near longitude similar to 120 degrees E on 16 July, and in the topside ionosphere the negative phase is mainly existed in the equatorial region. The topside and bottomside TEC contribute equally to the depletion in TEC, and the disturbed electric fields make a reasonable contribution. On 15 July, the positive storm effects are stronger in the Eastside than in the Westside. The topside TEC make a major contribution to the enhancement in TEC for the positive phases, showing the important role of the equatorward neutral winds. For the American sector, the equatorial ionization anomaly intensification is stronger in the Westside than in the Eastside and shows the strongest feature in the longitude similar to 110 degrees W. The combined effects of the disturbed electric fields, composition disturbances, and neutral winds cause the complex storm time features. Both the topside ion concentrations and TEC reveal the remarkable hemispheric asymmetry, which is mainly resulted from the asymmetry in neutral winds and composition disturbances.
引用
收藏
页码:4654 / 4668
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of the Regional Ionospheric Disturbance Index During Geomagnetic Storm in 2012
    Mostofa, Sadia
    Abdullah, Mardina
    Bahari, Siti Aminah
    Islam, Mohammad Tariqul
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 94742 - 94752
  • [2] Modeling of the ionospheric response to the geomagnetic storm of March 22, 1979
    Tashchilin, AV
    Romanova, EB
    [J]. GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2001, 41 (02) : 217 - 219
  • [3] Ionospheric effetcs of an intense geomagnetic storm
    G. A. Mansilla
    [J]. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 2007, 51 : 563 - 574
  • [4] Ionospheric effects during a geomagnetic storm
    Baran, LW
    Rotkiewicz, M
    Wielgosz, P
    Shagimuratov, II
    [J]. VISTAS FOR GEODESY IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 2002, 125 : 291 - 296
  • [5] Ionospheric effetcs of an intense geomagnetic storm
    Mansilla, G. A.
    [J]. STUDIA GEOPHYSICA ET GEODAETICA, 2007, 51 (04) : 563 - 574
  • [6] Geomagnetic Index for Intense Ionospheric Storm
    Deminov, Marat G.
    Deminov, Rafael G.
    [J]. 2019 RUSSIAN OPEN CONFERENCE ON RADIO WAVE PROPAGATION (RWP), VOL 1, 2019, : 37 - 40
  • [7] Ionospheric response to the June 2015 geomagnetic storm in the South American region
    Macho, Eduardo Perez
    Correia, Emilia
    Paulo, Claudio Machado
    Angulo, Lady
    Gomes Vieira, Jose Augusto
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2020, 65 (09) : 2172 - 2183
  • [8] Ionospheric response to a geomagnetic storm during November 8–10, 2004
    K. G. Simi
    G. Manju
    M. K. Madhav Haridas
    S. R. Prabhakaran Nayar
    Tarun Kumar Pant
    S. Alex
    [J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 2013, 65 : 343 - 350
  • [9] Global Ionospheric Response During Extreme Geomagnetic Storm in May 2024
    Bojilova, Rumiana
    Mukhtarov, Plamen
    Pancheva, Dora
    [J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16 (21)
  • [10] A Simulation Study of the Equatorial Ionospheric Response to the October 2013 Geomagnetic Storm
    Ren, Dexin
    Lei, Jiuhou
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2017, 122 (09) : 9696 - 9704