Performance Analysis for the Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Combined with the Forward Osmosis Membrane Bioreactor: Process Conditions Optimization, Wastewater Treatment and Sludge Characteristics

被引:4
|
作者
Ding, Yi [1 ]
Guo, Zhansheng [1 ]
Hou, Xuguang [1 ]
Mei, Junxue [1 ]
Liang, Zhenlin [1 ]
Li, Zhipeng [2 ]
Zhang, Chunpeng [3 ]
Jin, Chao [4 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Marine Coll, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol Weihai, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Urban Water Resources & Water Envir, Weihai 264200, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
wastewater treatment; anaerobic membrane bioreactor; forward osmosis membrane bioreactor; process conditions optimization; sludge characteristics; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; IMPACT; TEMPERATURE; SCALE; ANMBR;
D O I
10.3390/w12112958
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) were operated at 35 degrees C (H-AnMBR) and 25 degrees C (L-AnMBR) for long-term wastewater treatment. Two aerobic forward osmosis membrane bioreactors (FOMBRs) were utilized to treat the effluents of H-AnMBR and L-AnMBR, respectively. During the 180 days of operation, it is worth noting that the combined system was feasible, and the pollutant removal efficiency was higher. Though the permeate chemical oxygen demand (COD) of H-AnMBR (18.94 mg/L) was obviously lower than that of L-AnMBR (51.09 mg/L), the permeate CODs of the FOMBRs were almost the same with the average concentrations of 7.57 and 7.58 mg/L for the H-FOMBR and L-FOMBR, respectively. It was interesting that for both the AnMBRs, the permeate total nitrogen (TN) concentration was higher than that in bulk phase. However, the TN concentrations in the effluent remained stable with the values of 20.12 and 15.22 mg/L in the H-FOMBR and L-FOMBR effluents, respectively. For the two systems, the characteristics of activated sludge flocs were different for H-AnMBR-FOMBR sludge and L-AnMBR-FOMBR sludge. The viscosity of L-AnMBR-activated sludge (2.09 Pa center dot s) was higher compared to that of H-AnMBR (1.31 Pa center dot s), while the viscosity of activated sludge in L-FOMBR (1.44 Pa center dot s) was a little lower than that in H-FOMBR (1.48 Pa center dot s). The capillary water absorption time of L-AnMBR-activated sludge (69.6 s) was higher compared to that of H-AnMBR (49.5 s), while the capillary water absorption time of activated sludge in L-FOMBR (14.6 s) was little lower than that in H-FOMBR (15.6 s). The particle size of H-AnMBR-activated sludge (119.62 nm) was larger than that of L-AnMBR-activated sludge (84.92 nm), but the particle size of H-FOMBR-activated sludge (143.81 nm) was significantly smaller than that of L-FOMBR-activated sludge (293.38 nm). The observations of flocs indicated that the flocs of activated sludge in H-AnMBR were relatively loose, while the flocs of L-AnMBR were relatively tight. The fine sludge floc was less present in the L-FOMBR than in the H-FOMBR. Therefore, in the process of sewage treatment, the influent of each unit in the AnMBR-FOMBR system should have suitable organic content to maintain the particle sizes of sludge flocs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor with forward osmosis membrane for low-strength wastewater treatment
    Chen, Lin
    Gu, Yangshuo
    Cao, Chuqing
    Zhang, Jun
    Ng, Jing-Wen
    Tang, Chuyang
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2014, 50 : 114 - 123
  • [2] Wastewater treatment with anaerobic membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis
    Grundestarn, J.
    Hellstrom, D.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (05) : 211 - 217
  • [3] Forward osmosis membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment with phosphorus recovery
    Huang, Li-ying
    Lee, Duu-Jong
    Lai, Juin-Yih
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 198 : 418 - 423
  • [4] Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a forward osmosis membrane bioreactor treating anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent
    Ding, Yi
    Tian, Yu
    Li, Zhipeng
    Liu, Feng
    You, Hong
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 167 : 137 - 143
  • [5] Impact of sludge recirculation ratios on the performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment
    Aslam, Alia
    Khan, Sher Jamal
    Shahzad, Hafiz Muhammad Aamir
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 288
  • [6] Performance of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment
    Svojitka, Jan
    Dvorak, Lukas
    Studer, Martin
    Straub, Juerg Oliver
    Froemelt, Heinz
    Wintgens, Thomas
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 229 : 180 - 189
  • [7] The use of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis system for wastewater treatment
    Zgavarogea, Ramona
    Covaliu, Cristina
    Iordache, Andreea
    Niculescu, Violeta
    Neacsa, Marin
    [J]. UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series B: Chemistry and Materials Science, 2017, 79 (02): : 55 - 62
  • [8] Wastewater treatment using membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis process
    Chung, Jinwook
    Kim, Jong-Oh
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2013, 51 (25-27) : 5298 - 5306
  • [9] Improvement of sludge characteristics and mitigation of membrane fouling in the treatment of pesticide wastewater by electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor
    Hu, Dongxue
    Liu, Lixue
    Liu, Wenyu
    Yu, Liqiang
    Dong, Jian
    Han, Fei
    Wang, Hongcheng
    Chen, Zhaobo
    Ge, Hui
    Jiang, Bei
    Wang, Xin
    Cui, Yubo
    Zhang, Wanjun
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Shuchen
    Zhao, Longmei
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 213
  • [10] Evaluation of energy production from municipal wastewater using forward osmosis process and anaerobic membrane bioreactor
    Onoda, Sosuke
    Masumori, Yuta
    Miyoshi, Taro
    Yasukawa, Masahiro
    Takahashi, Tomoki
    Matsuyama, Hideto
    [J]. DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2017, 65 : 1 - 10