Bedside Interprofessional Rounds: Perceptions of Benefits and Barriers by Internal Medicine Nursing Staff, Attending Physicians, and Housestaff Physicians

被引:55
|
作者
Gonzalo, Jed D. [1 ,2 ]
Kuperman, Ethan [3 ]
Lehman, Erik [3 ]
Haidet, Paul [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Med, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
INTERDISCIPLINARY ROUNDS; CASE PRESENTATIONS; CARE; INTERVENTION; EDUCATION; TEACHERS; STUDENT; REFORM; TRIAL; WARDS;
D O I
10.1002/jhm.2245
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Interprofessional collaboration improves the quality of care, but integration into workflow is challenging. Although a shared conceptualization regarding bedside interprofessional rounds may enhance implementation, little work has investigated providers' perceptions of this activity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perceptions of nurses, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians regarding the benefits/barriers to bedside interprofessional rounds. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational, cross-sectional survey of hospital-based medicine nurses, attending physicians, and housestaff physicians. Descriptive, nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum and nonparametric correlation were used. MAIN MEASURES: Bedside interprofessional rounds were defined as "encounters including 2 physicians plus a nurse or other care provider discussing the case at the patient's bedside." Eighteen items related to "benefits" and 21 items related to "barriers" associated with bedside interprofessional rounds. RESULTS: Of 171 surveys sent, 149 were completed (87%). Highest-ranked benefits were related to communication/coordination, including "improves communication between nurses-physicians;" lowest-ranked benefits were related to efficiency, process, and outcomes, including "decreases length-of-stay" and "improves timeliness of consultations." Nurses reported most favorable ratings for all items (P <0.05). Rank order for 3 provider groups showed high correlation (r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Highest-ranked barriers were related to time, including "nursing staff have limited time;" lowest-ranked barriers were related to provider- and patient-related factors, including "patient lack of comfort." Rank order of barriers among all groups showed moderate correlation (r = 0.62-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Although nurses perceived greater benefit for bedside interprofessional rounds than physicians, all providers perceived coordination/teamwork benefits higher than outcomes. To the extent the results are generalilable, these findings lay the foundation for facilitating meaningful patient-centered interprofessional collaboration. (c) 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 651
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BEDSIDE INTERPROFESSIONAL ROUNDS: MEDICINE PROVIDERS PERCEPTIONS OF BENEFITS AND BARRIERS
    Gonzalo, Jed
    Kuperman, Ethan
    Lehman, Erik B.
    Haidet, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 : S40 - S40
  • [2] Bedside Rounds Valued But Not Preferred: Perceptions of Internal Medicine Residents and Attending Physicians in a Diverse Academic Training Program
    Merchant, Naseema B.
    Federman, Daniel G.
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (08) : 531 - 537
  • [3] Effectiveness of a skin cancer control educational intervention for internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians
    Nancy C. Dolan
    Jennie S. Ng
    Gary J. Martin
    June K. Robinson
    Alfred W. Rademaker
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1997, 12 : 531 - 536
  • [4] Effectiveness of a skin cancer control educational intervention for internal medicine housestaff and attending physicians
    Dolan, NC
    Ng, JS
    Martin, GJ
    Robinson, JK
    Rademaker, AW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 12 (09) : 531 - 536
  • [5] ATTENDING PHYSICIANS' PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES OF TEACHING HOUSESTAFF IN THE MEDICAL ICU
    McCutcheon, Marin
    Brady, Anna
    [J]. CHEST, 2021, 160 (04) : 1425A - 1425A
  • [6] Pharmacogenomics education and perceptions: is there a gap between internal medicine resident and attending physicians?
    Vitek, Carolyn R. Rohrer
    Giri, Jyothsna
    Caraballo, Pedro J.
    Curry, Timothy B.
    Nicholson, Wayne T.
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2021, 22 (04) : 195 - 201
  • [7] Medical students' perceptions of the elements of effective inpatient teaching by attending physicians and housestaff
    Elnicki, DM
    Cooper, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (07) : 635 - 639
  • [8] Medical students’ perceptions of the elements of effective inpatient teaching by attending physicians and housestaff
    D. Michael Elnicki
    Amanda Cooper
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005, 20 : 635 - 639
  • [9] Perception of physicians and nursing staff members regarding outside versus bedside ward rounds: ancillary analysis of the randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial
    Gross, Sebastian
    Beck, Katharina
    Becker, Christoph
    Gamp, Martina
    Mueller, Jonas
    Loretz, Nina
    Amacher, Simon A.
    Bohren, Chantal
    Gaab, Jens
    Schuetz, Philipp
    Mueller, Beat
    Fux, Christoph A.
    Leuppi, Joerg D.
    Schaefert, Rainer
    Langewitz, Wolf
    Trendelenburg, Marten
    Breidthardt, Tobias
    Eckstein, Jens
    Osthoff, Michael
    Bassetti, Stefano
    Hunziker, Sabina
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2022, 152
  • [10] Nursing staff's and physicians' acquisition of competences and attitudes to interprofessional education and interprofessional collaboration in pediatrics
    Straub, Christine
    Heinzmann, Andrea
    Krueger, Marcus
    Bode, Sebastian F. N.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)