Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement

被引:130
|
作者
Law, Effie Lai-Chong [1 ]
van Schaik, Paul [2 ]
Roto, Virpi [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Comp Sci, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[2] Univ Teesside, Sch Psychol, Tees Valley, England
[3] Aalto Univ, Sch Arts Design & Architecture, Espoo, Finland
关键词
User experience; UX measurement; Survey; Experiential quality; USABILITY; QUALITY; EMOTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.09.006
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
User experience (UX), as a recently established research area, is still haunted by the challenges of defining the scope of UX in general and operationalising experiential qualities in particular. To explore the basic question whether UX constructs are measurable, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 UX researchers from academia and one UX practitioner from the industry where a set of questions in relation to UX measurement were explored (Study 1). The interviewees expressed scepticism as well as ambivalence towards UX measures and shared anecdotes related to such measures in different contexts. Interestingly, the results suggested that design-oriented UX professionals tended to be sceptical about UX measurement. To examine whether such an attitude prevailed in the HCI community, we conducted a survey - UX Measurement Attitudes Survey (UXMAS) - with essentially the same set of 13 questions used in the interviews (Study 2). Specifically, participants were asked to rate a set of five statements to assess their attitude towards UX measurement, to identify (non)measurable experiential qualities with justifications, and to discuss the topic from the theoretical, methodological and practical perspectives. The survey was implemented in a paper-based and an online format. Altogether, 367 responses were received; 170 of them were valid and analysed. The survey provided empirical evidence on this issue as a baseline for progress in UX measurement. Overall, the survey results indicated that the attitude towards UX measurement was more positive than that identified in the interviews, and there were nuanced views on details of UX measurement. Implications for enhancing the acceptance of UX measures and the interplay between UX evaluation and system development are drawn: UX modelling grounded in theories to link experiential qualities with outcomes; the development of UX measurement tools with good measurement properties, and education within the HCI community to disseminate validated models, and measurement tools as well as their successful applications. Mutual recognition of the value of objective measures and subjective accounts of user experience can enhance the maturity of this area. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 541
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantified UX: Towards a Common Organizational Understanding of User Experience
    Lachner, Florian
    Naegelein, Philipp
    Kowalski, Robert
    Spann, Martin
    Butz, Andreas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NORDICHI '16: THE 9TH NORDIC CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - GAME CHANGING DESIGN, 2016,
  • [2] The user experience (UX) in libraries
    Massis, Bruce
    [J]. INFORMATION AND LEARNING SCIENCE, 2018, 119 (3-4): : 241 - 244
  • [3] User Experience (UX) Design for Libraries
    Calvert, Philip
    [J]. ELECTRONIC LIBRARY, 2013, 31 (03): : 400 - 401
  • [4] THE USER EXPERIENCE Setting UX Priorities
    Schmidt, Aaron
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2015, 140 (18) : 23 - 23
  • [5] User Experience (UX) Research in Games
    Nacke, Lennart E.
    Mirza-Babaei, Pejman
    Drachen, Anders
    [J]. CHI EA '19 EXTENDED ABSTRACTS: EXTENDED ABSTRACTS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [6] THE USER EXPERIENCE UX Means You
    Schmidt, Aaron
    [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2015, 140 (16) : 21 - 21
  • [7] Measurement practices in user experience (UX) research: a systematic quantitative literature review
    Perrig, Sebastian A. C.
    Aeschbach, Lena Fanya
    Scharowski, Nicolas
    von Felten, Nick
    Opwis, Klaus
    Bruhlmann, Florian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2024, 6
  • [8] Taxonomies of User Experience (UX) Evaluation Methods
    Rajeshkumar, S.
    Omar, Ridha
    Mahmud, Murni
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICRIIS), 2013, : 533 - 538
  • [9] Generalized User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-G): Holistic Measurement of Multimodal UX
    Boothe, Chase S.
    Strawderman, Lesley
    Burch, Reuben F.
    Smith, Brian K.
    Bethel, Cindy L.
    Holmes, Kate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF USABILITY STUDIES, 2024, 19 (02)
  • [10] Poster: Crowdsourcing for User Experience(UX) Evaluation
    Meedin, G. S. Nadeera
    Perera, Indika
    [J]. MOBISYS'16: COMPANION COMPANION PUBLICATION OF THE 14TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE SYSTEMS, APPLICATIONS, AND SERVICES, 2016, : 58 - 58