The Common Law Constitution at Work: R (on the application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor

被引：10

作者：

Bogg, Alan ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Bristol, Labour Law, Bristol, Avon, England

来源：

MODERN LAW REVIEW | 2018年 / 81卷 / 03期

关键词：

employment status; worker; Gig Economy; fundamental rights; access to a court; LABOR-LAW; EMPLOYMENT;

D O I：

10.1111/1468-2230.12343

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This note considers the radical significance of Supreme Court's judgment in R (on the Application of UNISON) v Lord Chancellor (UNISON) on the unlawfulness of tribunal fees. It argues that the decision marks the coming of age of the common law constitution at work'. The radical potential of UNISON lies in its generation of horizontal legal effects in disputes between private parties. Recent litigation on employment status in the gig economy' is analysed through the lens of UNISON and common law fundamental rights. The note identifies the various ways in which the common law tests of employment status might be constitutionalised' in the light of UNISON.

引用

页码：509 / 526

页数：18

共 18 条

[1] Employment Tribunal Fees and the Rule of Law: R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor in the Supreme Court
Ford, Michael
[J]. INDUSTRIAL LAW JOURNAL, 2018, 47 (01) : 1 - 45
[2] Challenging Employment Tribunal Fees: R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor and another (No 2)
Busby, Nicole
[J]. EDINBURGH LAW REVIEW, 2015, 19 (02) : 254 - 259
[3] Embodying the Law:Coker and Osamor v. The Lord Chancellorand the Lord Chancellor's Department [2002]I.R.L.R. 80 (Court of Appeal)
Anne Morris
[J]. Feminist Legal Studies, 2003, 11 (1) : 45 - 55
[4] The Supreme Court turns the Judicial Rhetoric on Access to Justice up to 11 as it Strikes down Unaffordable and Disproportionate Employment Tribunal Fees, but Key Questions about the Funding of Civil Justice Remain: R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51
Higgins, Andrew
[J]. CIVIL JUSTICE QUARTERLY, 2018, 37 (01): : 1 - 12
[5] CONSPIRACIES, CODES AND THE COMMON LAW: ANSARI V THE QUEEN AND R V LK
McArthur, Jackie
[J]. ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW, 2012, 33 (01): : 271 - 280
[6] CONSTITUTION AND THE COMMON-LAW - DECLINE OF THE DOCTRINES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FEDERALISM - BRIDWELL,R, WHITTEN,RU
GREY, TC
[J]. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY, 1979, 65 (04) : 1121 - 1122
[7] CONSTITUTION AND THE COMMON-LAW - DECLINE OF DOCTRINES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FEDERALISM - BRIDWELL,R, WHITTEN,RU
FREYER, T
[J]. REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, 1979, 7 (03) : 319 - 324
[8] THE CONSTITUTION AND THE COMMON-LAW - THE DECLINE OF THE DOCTRINES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FEDERALISM - BRIDWELL,R, WHITTEN,RU
ROSSUM, RA
[J]. PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 1980, 10 (03) : 148 - 150
[9] CONSTITUTION AND COMMON-LAW - DECLINE OF DOCTRINES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FEDERALISM - BRIDWELL,R, WHITTEN,RU
JOHNSON, HA
[J]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 1978, 31 (03) : 761 - 767
[10] CONSTITUTION AND COMMON-LAW - DECLINE OF DOCTRINES OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AND FEDERALISM - BRIDWELL,R, WHITTEN,RU
ELY, JW
[J]. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 1978, 53 (02) : 277 - 284

← 1 2 →