Magnetic resonance imaging of active sacroiliitis: Do we really need gadolinium?

被引:79
|
作者
Althoff, Christian E. [1 ]
Feist, Eugen [2 ]
Burova, Elena [1 ]
Eshed, Iris [3 ]
Bollow, Matthias [4 ]
Hamm, Bernd [1 ]
Hermann, Kay-Geert A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Radiol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Radiol, Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[4] Augusta Hosp, Dept Radiol, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Sacroiliitis; Ankylosing spondylitis; Spondyloarthritis; Contrast medium; Scoring; ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS; MR; SPONDYLARTHROPATHY; RADIOGRAPHY; SEQUENCES; JOINTS; SPINE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.034
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of active inflammatory changes of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) in spondyloarthritis (SpA) is performed with short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and fat-saturated T1-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences after administration of gadolinium-based contrast medium (T1/Gd). The aim of the present study was to compare these two pulse sequences in terms of diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and quantification of inflammatory changes. Materials and methods: The study included 105 patients with suspected SpA; 72 patients developed clinical SpA over time. All patients were examined with STIR and T1/Gd and each of the two sequences was analyzed separately in conjunction with unenhanced T1 FSE images. For quantitative estimation of inflammatory changes, each sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was divided into 4 quadrants (and severity per quadrant was assigned a score of 0-4, resulting in a maximum sum score of 16 per SIJ). Diagnostic confidence was assessed on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10. Results: Active sacroiliitis was diagnosed in 46 patients and ruled out in 34 using STIR, whereas findings were inconclusive in 25 patients. The corresponding numbers for T1/Gd were 47, 44, and 14. Diagnostic confidence was significantly lower for STIR (7.3 +/- 2.6) compared with T1/Gd (8.7 +/- 1.9) (p < 0.001). The sum scores were 2.5 (+/- 3.3) for STIR and 2.2 (+/- 3.2) for T1/Gd for the right SIJ and 2.2 (+/- 2.9) (STIR) and 1.9 (+/- 3.1) (T1/Gd) for the left SIJ. Agreement was high with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.86 for the right SIJ and 0.90 for the left SIJ and positive correlation (r = 0.62 right, 0.60 left). Summary: STIR sequences alone are sufficient for establishing a reliable diagnosis and quantify the amount of inflammation in active sacroiliitis. A contrast-enhanced study is dispensable in patients with established disease or in the setting of clinical follow-up studies. However, a contrast-enhanced MR sequence is beneficial to ensure maximum diagnostic confidence when patients with early sacroiliitis are examined. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 236
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indications for magnetic resonance imaging in Internal Medicine - When do we really need this technology?
    Schreyer, A. G.
    Debl, K.
    Herfarth, H.
    [J]. INTERNIST, 2010, 51 (04): : 451 - +
  • [2] Do we need gadolinium-based contrast medium for brain magnetic resonance imaging in children?
    Duenger, Dennis
    Krause, Matthias
    Graefe, Daniel
    Merkenschlager, Andreas
    Roth, Christian
    Sorge, Ina
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 48 (06) : 858 - 864
  • [3] Do we need gadolinium-based contrast medium for brain magnetic resonance imaging in children?
    Dennis Dünger
    Matthias Krause
    Daniel Gräfe
    Andreas Merkenschlager
    Christian Roth
    Ina Sorge
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2018, 48 : 858 - 864
  • [4] Magnetic endoscopic Imaging for routine Colonoscopy - Do we really need it?
    Dechene, Alexancler
    Lopez, Evelyn J. Maldonado
    Hilgard, Philip a.
    Schlaaak, Joerg F.
    Beckebaum, Susanne
    Gerken, Guido
    Zoepf, Thomas
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (05) : AB130 - AB130
  • [5] Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging?
    Irnich, W
    Irnich, B
    Bartsch, C
    Stertmann, WA
    Gufler, H
    Weiler, G
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2005, 7 (04): : 353 - 365
  • [6] Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging?
    Naehle, CP
    Litt, H
    Lewalter, T
    Sommer, T
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2006, 8 (05): : 388 - 388
  • [7] Why do we need magnetic resonance imaging in cardiology?
    Edvardsen, T
    Rosen, BD
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2005, 39 (05) : 260 - 263
  • [8] ACTIVE SACROILIITIS ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH ANTERIOR UVEITIS
    Bubova, Kristyna
    Gregova, Monika
    Zegzulkova, Katerina
    Pavelka, Karel
    Heissigerova, Jarmila
    Senolt, Ladislav
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 : 470 - 471
  • [9] Do we really need to do this?
    Ehnert, Jesse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 153 (03):
  • [10] Cardiac magnetic resonance in systemic sclerosis patients with cardiac symptoms: do we really need it?
    De Luca, G.
    Campochiaro, C.
    Cavalli, G.
    Dagna, L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (08) : 2189 - 2190