Automatic detection of mud-wall signatures in ground-penetrating radar data

被引:1
|
作者
Bordon, Pablo [1 ]
Martinelli, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Zabala Medina, Peter [1 ]
Bonomo, Nestor [1 ,2 ]
Ratto, Norma Rosa [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Fis, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, CONICET, Inst Fis Buenos Aires IFIBA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Filosofia & Letras, CONICET, Inst Culturas IDECU, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
automatic detection; cascade classifier; GPR; mud wall; Viola– Jones; PATTERN-RECOGNITION; GPR DATA; VILLAGE; REMAINS; SITE; CITY; LOCATION; VOIDS;
D O I
10.1002/arp.1799
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
The ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method with the standard constant-offset reflection mode allows to detect and map different types of archaeological structures, such as walls, foundations, floors and roads. The interpretation of the GPR data usually involves a detailed and time-consuming analysis of large amounts of information, which entails nonnegligible chances of errors, especially under nonideal fieldwork conditions. The application of suitable automatic detection algorithms can be useful to more rapidly and successfully complete the interpretation task. In this work, we explore the use of supervised machine learning methodologies to automatically detect mud-wall signatures in radargrams and to map the structures from these detections. Several algorithms, based on Viola-Jones cascade classifiers and the image feature descriptors Haar, histogram of oriented gradients and local binary patterns, were implemented. These algorithms were applied to datasets previously acquired in pre-Inca and Inca-Hispanic sites located in the Andean NW region of Argentina. The best algorithms provided very good detection rates for well-preserved walls and acceptable rates for deteriorated walls, with a low number of spurious predictions. They also exhibited the ability to detect collapsed walls and fragments detached from them. These are remarkable results because mud walls are usually difficult to be detected by conventional analysis, owing to the complex and variable characteristics of their reflection patterns. The results of the automatic detection techniques were represented in plan views and three-dimensional (3D) views that delineated in detail most of the structures of the sites. These algorithms are very fast, so applying them significantly reduces the interpretation times. In addition, once they have been trained using the patterns of one or several sites, they are directly applicable to other sites with similar characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 106
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automatic detection of hyperbolic signatures in ground-penetrating radar data
    Al-Nuaimy, W
    Huang, Y
    Eriksen, A
    Nguyen, VT
    [J]. SUBSURFACE AND SURFACE SENSING TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS III, 2001, 4491 : 327 - 335
  • [2] Remigration of ground-penetrating radar data
    Jaya, MS
    Botelho, MA
    Hubral, P
    Liebhardt, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 41 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [3] Automatic asphalt layer interface detection and thickness determination from ground-penetrating radar data
    Wang, Siqi
    Leng, Zhen
    Zhang, Zeyu
    Sui, Xin
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 357
  • [4] Detection of Buried Roman Wall Remains in Ground-penetrating Radar Data using Template Matching
    Verdonck, Lieven
    [J]. ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROSPECTION, 2016, 23 (04) : 257 - 272
  • [5] GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR
    OWEN, TE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 33 (1-3) : 5 - 6
  • [6] GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR FOR THE DETECTION OF LIQUID CONTAMINANTS
    DANIELS, JJ
    ROBERTS, R
    VENDL, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 33 (1-3) : 195 - 207
  • [7] Efficient Deconvolution of Ground-Penetrating Radar Data
    Schmelzbach, Cedric
    Huber, Emanuel
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 53 (09): : 5209 - 5217
  • [8] A method for interpretation of ground-penetrating radar data
    Yufryakov, BA
    Surikov, BS
    Sosulin, YG
    Linnikov, ON
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS, 2004, 49 (12) : 1342 - 1356
  • [9] Modeling of crosshole ground-penetrating radar data
    Balkaya, Caglayan
    Gokturkler, Gokhan
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2016, 22 (06): : 581 - 596
  • [10] Diffraction imaging of ground-penetrating radar data
    Yuan, Hemin
    Montazeri, Mahboubeh
    Looms, Majken C.
    Nielsen, Lars
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2019, 84 (03) : H1 - H12