Awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China to the reporting of adverse drug reactions

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Q [1 ]
Zhang, SM
Chen, HT
Fang, SP
Yu, X
Liu, D
Shi, LY
Zeng, FD
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Inst Clin Pharmacol, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Xiehe Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Stat & Epidemiol, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Ctr Monitoring Adverse Drug React, Beijing 100810, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, Zhongnan Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[7] Peoples Hosp Hubei Province, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
关键词
adverse drug reaction reporting systems; cross-section study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background A voluntary procedure for reporting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was formally put in place in 1989. However, only a small proportion of ADR reports are actually forwarded to the national monitoring center. To identify the reasons for underreporting, the authors investigated the awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals ( doctors, nurses, and administrators) toward the ADR system in China. In addition, the authors sought to formulate approaches to improve the current ADR reporting system. Methods Structured interviews were carried out in 16 hospitals selected from 27 municipal hospitals in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. A questionnaire survey of a stratified random sample of approximately 15% of healthcare professionals in each selected hospital was conducted during February to March 2003. Results The response rate of this survey was 85%. One thousand six hundred and fifty-three questionnaires were used in the final analysis. Only 2.7% of the healthcare professionals had a correct understanding to the definition of ADR. Eighty-nine point two percent of the healthcare professionals had encountered ADRs. Ninety-four percent of them were aware of the need to report these to the ADR monitoring center. However, only 28.5% of doctors, 22.8% of nurses, and 29.7% of administrators actually submitted a report. For the most part, they reported ADRs to the hospital pharmacy (66.0%), to other departments in the hospital (72.5%), and to the pharmaceutical industry (23.0%), rather than to the national monitoring center (2.9%) or regional monitoring center (9.5%). Severe or rare ADRs and ADRs to new products were generally perceived to be significant enough to report. Sixty-two point one percent of the healthcare professionals had encountered ADRs, yet not reported them to anybody. The major reasons for not reporting included no knowledge of the reporting procedure (71.4%), unavailability of the reporting center mailing address (67.9%), unavailability of the ADR report form (60.4%), lack of knowledge of the existence of a national ADR reporting system (52.2%), and belief that the ADR in question was already well known (44.1%). Conclusions Healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China have little basic knowledge of ADR and of the voluntary reporting system. The main reasons for underreporting were lack of basic knowledge about ADRs and the voluntary reporting procedure. Education and training of healthcare professionals is needed to improve the current ADR reporting system.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 861
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Wuhan,China to the reporting of adverse drug reactions
    李青
    张素敏
    陈华庭
    方世平
    于星
    刘东
    施侣元
    曾繁典
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2004, (06) : 56 - 61
  • [2] Awareness and attitudes of healthcare professionals in Wuhan,China to the reporting of adverse drug reactions
    李青
    张素敏
    陈华庭
    方世平
    于星
    刘东
    施侣元
    曾繁典
    [J]. ChineseMedicalJournal., 2004, (06)
  • [3] Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal
    Santosh KC
    Pramote Tragulpiankit
    Sarun Gorsanan
    I Ralph Edwards
    [J]. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 14
  • [4] Attitudes among healthcare professionals to the reporting of adverse drug reactions in Nepal
    Santosh, K. C.
    Tragulpiankit, Pramote
    Gorsanan, Sarun
    Edwards, I. Ralph
    [J]. BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2013, 14
  • [5] The Knowledge and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Healthcare Professionals and the Public in China
    Mo, Xiaomei
    Leng, Xiaowei
    Zhang, Jinli
    Du, Ruqiong
    Yang, Xiaofen
    Liu, Ming
    Wang, Jianghai
    Sun, Gang
    Zhang, Chunli
    Wang, Jin
    Yin, Mengting
    Li, Huahui
    Yan, Meixing
    [J]. LATIN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY, 2023, 42 (09): : 1948 - 1961
  • [6] Exploring Healthcare Professionals' Practices and Attitudes towards Monitoring and Reporting of Severe Adverse Drug Reactions
    Srisuriyachanchai, Warisara
    Cox, Anthony R.
    Jarernsiripornkul, Narumol
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [7] Healthcare professionals' awareness and knowledge of adverse drug reactions and pharmacovigilance
    Almandil, Noor B.
    [J]. SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (12) : 1359 - 1364
  • [8] Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals towards Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Nepal
    Santosh, K. C.
    Tragulpiankit, Pramote
    Gorsanan, Sarun
    Edwards, Ralph
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 : S337 - S337
  • [9] Differences in Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions Between Consumers and Healthcare Professionals
    Anton, C.
    Sahak, R.
    Badyal, K.
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 44 (12) : 1449 - 1449
  • [10] Awareness and Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions Among Health Care Professionals in Sudan
    Elnour, Asim Ahmed
    Ahmed, Ahmed Dahab
    Yousif, Mirghani Abd Elrahman
    Shehab, Abdulla
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2009, 35 (06): : 324 - +