In Vitro and In Vivo Investigation of the Influence of Implant Surface on the Formation of Bacterial Biofilm in Mammary Implants

被引:142
|
作者
Jacombs, Anita [1 ]
Tahir, Shamaila [1 ]
Hu, Honghua [1 ]
Deva, Anand K. [1 ]
Almatroudi, Ahmad [1 ]
Wessels, William Louis Fick [1 ]
Bradshaw, David A. [1 ]
Vickery, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Surg Infect Res Grp, Australian Sch Adv Med, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; SMOOTH IMPLANTS; PORCINE MODEL; FOLLOW-UP; PREVENTION; ADHESION; IRRIGATION; ATTACHMENT;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Capsular contracture remains the most common complication following breast augmentation surgery, and evidence suggests that bacterial biofilm on the implant surface is responsible. The authors investigated whether the interaction of bacterial biofilm with implants independently determines progression to capsule formation. They also studied the rate of bacterial growth and adhesion to implants. Methods: Sixteen adult female pigs had 121 breast implants inserted. Sixty-six implants23 smooth and 43 texturedwere inoculated with a human strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis and received no other treatment. After an average period of 19 weeks, Baker grading was performed and implants were retrieved. For the in vitro study, samples underwent both quantitative bacterial analysis and imaging using confocal laser scanning and scanning electron microscopy. Results: At explantation, there was no significant difference (p = 1.0) in the presence of capsular contracture (Baker grade III and IV) between smooth (83 percent) and textured implants (84 percent). Biofilm was confirmed on 60 of the 66 capsules. Capsules from smooth and textured implants had the same number of infecting bacteria (textured: 3.01 x 10(8) bacteria/g; smooth: 3.00 x 10(8) bacteria/g). In vitro, the surface of textured implants showed 11-, 43-, and 72-fold more bacteria at 2, 6, and 24 hours, respectively, compared with smooth implants (p < 0.001). These findings were confirmed by imaging analysis. Conclusions: These results show that textured implants develop a significantly higher load of bacterial biofilm in comparison with smooth implants. Furthermore, in vivo, once a threshold of biofilm forms on either smooth or textured implant surfaces, there seems to be an equal propensity to progress to capsular contracture.
引用
收藏
页码:471E / 480E
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Surface Tooling Techniques of Medical Titanium Implants on Bacterial Biofilm Formation In Vitro
    Sarfraz, Sonia
    Mantynen, Pilvi-helina
    Laurila, Marisa
    Suojanen, Juho
    Saarnio, Juha
    Rossi, Sami
    Horelli, Jani
    Kaakinen, Mika
    Leikola, Junnu
    Reunanen, Justus
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (09)
  • [2] Impact of bacterial biofilm formation on in vitro and in vivo activities of antibiotics
    Schwank, S
    Rajacic, Z
    Zimmerli, W
    Blaser, J
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (04) : 895 - 898
  • [3] In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces
    Buergers, Ralf
    Gerlach, Till
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Schwarz, Frank
    Handel, Gerhard
    Gosau, Martin
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [4] Influence of different instrumentation modalities on the surface characteristics and biofilm formation on dental implant neck, in vitro
    Schmidt, Kristina Emily
    Auschill, Thorsten Mathias
    Heumann, Christian
    Frankenberger, Roland
    Eick, Sigrun
    Sculean, Anton
    Arweiler, Nicole Birgit
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (04) : 483 - 490
  • [5] An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: Structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces
    Sanchez, M. C.
    Llama-Palacios, A.
    Fernandez, E.
    Figuero, E.
    Marin, M. J.
    Leon, R.
    Blanc, V.
    Herrera, D.
    Sanz, M.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (10) : 1161 - 1171
  • [6] Bacterial biofilm formation on headpieces of Cochlear implants
    Kirchhoff, Lisa
    Arweiler-Harbeck, Diana
    Meyer, Moritz
    Buer, Jan
    Lang, Stephan
    Steinmann, Joerg
    Bertram, Ralf
    Deuss, Eric
    Hoeing, Benedikt
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 281 (12) : 6261 - 6266
  • [7] Bacterial biofilm formation on a human cochlear implant
    Pawlowski, KS
    Wawro, T
    Roland, PS
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) : 972 - 975
  • [8] Effects of Oral Implant Surface Roughness on Bacterial Biofilm Formation and Treatment Efficacy
    Lin, Hai Yan
    Liu, Yuelian
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    Crielaard, Wim
    Deng, Dong Mei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (05) : 1226 - 1231
  • [9] Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
    Moore, Kelly
    Gupta, Niraj
    Gupta, Tripti Thapa
    Patel, Khushi
    Brooks, Jacob R.
    Sullivan, Anne
    Litsky, Alan S.
    Stoodley, Paul
    MICROORGANISMS, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [10] In vivo Biofilm on the Surface of a Surgical Mesh Implant
    Reslinski, Adrian
    Mikucka, Agnieszka
    Szmytkowski, Jakub
    Gospodarek, Eugenia
    Dabrowiecki, Stanislaw
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 58 (04) : 367 - 369