A nature-based solution in forest management to improve ecosystem services and mitigate their trade-offs

被引:27
|
作者
Ma, Shuai [1 ]
Wang, Hui-Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaomian [2 ]
Wang, Liang-Jie [1 ]
Jiang, Jiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Co Innovat Ctr Sustainable Forestry Southern China, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Soil Eros & Ecol Restorat, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Acad Forestry, Hangzhou 310023, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Trade-offs; Bamboo forests; Monoculture plantation; Forest management; BAMBOO FOREST; SOIL-EROSION; CARBON; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131557
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of monoculture plantations for the restoration of forests has increased worldwide, but this approach may reduce ecosystem services (ESs) and result in ES trade-offs, posing great difficulties for ecosystem management. There is often a trade-off between provisioning services (PSs) and regulating and habitat services (RHSs). Coordinating ES trade-offs through scientific and effective management is key to achieving sustainable devel-opment and improving human well-being. In this study, bamboo forest, a monoculture plantation type, was studied in Anji County, China. The Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) model was used to evaluate product provision (PP), flood mitigation (FM), soil conservation (SC), nitrogen retention (NR), phosphorus retention (PR), carbon storage (CS), and habitat quality (HQ). A forest conservation (FC) scenario was established to explore the impact of bamboo forest expansion on ESs. The grain for green (GFG) scenario and the intercropped bamboo forest (IBF) scenario (a nature-based solution) were developed to reduce or eliminate ES trade-offs. The results showed that the expansion of bamboo forests led to an increase in PP (+13.71%) and declines in FM (-2.23%), CS (-15.69%), SC (-3.63%), NR (-30.14%), PR (-9.16%), and HQ (-11.84%). The GFG scenario greatly increased multiple ESs (but not PP) but strengthened the trade-offs be-tween PSs and RHSs. IBF was able to generate income (+66.89%), improve a variety of ESs (FM, +10.01%; CS, +22.09%; SC, +52.56%; NR, +28.48%; PR, +19.17%; HQ, +17.89%), and eliminate ES trade-offs. Intercropping vegetation can increase the economic income from bamboo forests and enhance ESs by providing crops and increasing canopy structure, aboveground biomass, root systems and litter. Some suggestions are proposed to improve plantation forest management. This study can serve as a reference for forest management in plantation regions within and beyond China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forests as Nature-Based Solutions: Ecosystem Services, Multiple Benefits and Trade-Offs
    Salvatori, Elisabetta
    Pallante, Giacomo
    [J]. FORESTS, 2021, 12 (06):
  • [2] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146
  • [3] Assessing synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest landscape management
    Jafarzadeh, Ali Akbar
    Mahdavi, Ali
    Shamsi, Seyed Rashid Fallah
    Yousefpour, Rasoul
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [4] Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management
    Schwaiger, Fabian
    Poschenrieder, Werner
    Biber, Peter
    Pretzsch, Hans
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [5] Integrating Expert Knowledge into Mapping Ecosystem Services Trade-offs for Sustainable Forest Management
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Brunner, Sibyl H.
    Altwegg, Juerg
    Christen, Marc
    Bebi, Peter
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [6] A nature-based approach to mitigate flood risk and improve ecosystem services in Shiga, Japan
    Huang, Wanhui
    Hashimoto, Shizuka
    Yoshida, Takehito
    Saito, Osamu
    Taki, Kentaro
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50
  • [7] The impact of secondary forest restoration on multiple ecosystem services and their trade-offs
    Zeng, Yelin
    Gou, Mengmeng
    Ouyang, Shuai
    Chen, Liang
    Fang, Xi
    Zhao, Lijuan
    Li, Jiaxiang
    Peng, Changhui
    Xiang, Wenhua
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 104 : 248 - 258
  • [8] Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs for plantation forest management to benefit provisioning and regulating services
    Dai, Er-fu
    Wang, Xiao-li
    Zhu, Jian-jia
    Xi, Wei-min
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 7 (19): : 7807 - 7821
  • [9] Regulating ecosystem services in a local forest: Navigating supply, trade-offs, and synergies
    Jo, Jang-Hwan
    Choi, Moongi
    Kweon, Deogkyu
    Son, Young-Gyun
    Lim, Emily Marie
    [J]. TREES FORESTS AND PEOPLE, 2024, 15
  • [10] Trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services under different forest management scenarios - The LEcA tool
    Pang, Xi
    Nordstroem, Eva-Maria
    Boettcher, Hannes
    Trubins, Renats
    Moertberg, Ulla
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 67 - 79