NURSING AND EUTHANASIA: A REVIEW OF ARGUMENT-BASED ETHICS LITERATURE

被引:28
|
作者
Quaghebeur, Toon [2 ]
de Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx
Gastmans, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Fac Med, Ctr Biomed Eth & Law, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Leuven Univ Coll, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
care; ethics; euthanasia; literature review; nursing; principles; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; ASSISTED SUICIDE; NURSES ATTITUDES; MEDICAL-PRACTICE; THE-LITERATURE; END; NETHERLANDS; FLANDERS; POLICIES; BELGIUM;
D O I
10.1177/0969733009104610
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article gives an overview of the nursing ethics arguments on euthanasia in general, and on nurses' involvement in euthanasia in particular, through an argument-based literature review. An in-depth study of these arguments in this literature will enable nurses to engage in the euthanasia debate. We critically appraised 41 publications published between January 1987 and June 2007. Nursing ethics arguments on ( nurses' involvement in) euthanasia are guided primarily by the principles of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice. Ethical arguments related to the nursing profession are described. From a care perspective, we discuss arguments that evaluate to what degree euthanasia can be considered positively or negatively as a form of good nursing care. Most arguments in the principle-, profession- and care-orientated approaches to nursing ethics are used both pro and contra euthanasia in general, and nurses' involvement in euthanasia in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 486
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minors and euthanasia: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
    Giulia Cuman
    Chris Gastmans
    [J]. European Journal of Pediatrics, 2017, 176 : 837 - 847
  • [2] Minors and euthanasia: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
    Cuman, Giulia
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 176 (07) : 837 - 847
  • [3] Moral distress: A review of the argument-based nursing ethics literature
    McCarthy, Joan
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2015, 22 (01) : 131 - 152
  • [4] Trust and trustworthiness in nursing: an argument-based literature review
    Dinc, Leyla
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. NURSING INQUIRY, 2012, 19 (03) : 223 - 237
  • [5] The concept of vulnerability in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
    Virginia Sanchini
    Roberta Sala
    Chris Gastmans
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 23
  • [6] Palliative Sedation for Existential Suffering: A Systematic Review of Argument-Based Ethics Literature
    Rodrigues, Paulo
    Crokaert, Jasper
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 55 (06) : 1577 - 1590
  • [7] Nursing and euthanasia: A narrative review of the nursing ethics literature
    Pesut, Barbara
    Greig, Madeleine
    Thorne, Sally
    Storch, Janet
    Burgess, Michael
    Tishelman, Carol
    Chambaere, Kenneth
    Janke, Robert
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2020, 27 (01) : 152 - 167
  • [8] Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature
    Cavolo, Alice
    de Casterle, Bernadette Dierckx
    Naulaers, Gunnar
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 47 (12) : E4
  • [9] Sexuality in institutionalized elderly persons: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
    Mahieu, Lieslot
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2012, 24 (03) : 346 - 357
  • [10] The concept of vulnerability in aged care: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature
    Sanchini, Virginia
    Sala, Roberta
    Gastmans, Chris
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 23 (01)