Visualisation of dislocations in hemp fibres: A comparison between scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and polarized light microscopy (PLM)

被引:41
|
作者
Thygesen, Lisbeth G.
Bilde-Sorensen, Jorgen B.
Hoffmeyer, Preben
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Civil Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Riso Natl Lab, Mat Res Dept, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
dislocations; fibres; hemp (Cannabis sativa L.); scanning electron microscopy (SEM); polarized light microscopy (PLM);
D O I
10.1016/j.indcrop.2006.03.009
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Dislocations are areas of the cell wall in natural fibres where the direction of the microfibrils (the microfibril angle) differs from the microfibril angle of the surrounding cell wall. Such regions affect the quality of natural fibres for industrial use. Dislocations may be studied using a number of techniques, and in this study two of them were compared: scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and polarized light microscopy (PLM). Images are presented that show exactly the same dislocations using these two techniques. The comparison showed that dislocations are more numerous and more clearly visible in images from PLM than in images from SEM, as dislocations are only seen in SEM if they are so large that they result in topographical changes of the fibre surface, i.e. a buckling of the S1 wall or a folding of the whole cell wall. However, for such large dislocations details are seen in the cell wall using SEM, while only a large bright region is seen in PLM. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 185
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of dislocations in spruce pulp and hemp fibres using polarized light microscopy and image analysis
    Thygesen, LG
    Ander, P
    NORDIC PULP & PAPER RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2005, 20 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [2] Visualisation of intrapulmonal asbestos fibres by scanning electron microscopy of methacrylate casts.
    Voss, B
    Kerenyi, T
    Müller, K
    Wilhelm, M
    JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 48 (12) : 1729 - 1729
  • [3] COMPARISON OF MORPHOMETRIC LIGHT-MICROSCOPY (MLM) AND QUANTITATIVE SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY (SEM) IN DETERMINING GLOMERULAR SIZE
    SMITHPOWELL, L
    TEXTOR, SC
    HARDY, J
    MILLER, M
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1988, 33 (01) : 325 - 325
  • [4] Microstructural imaging techniques: a comparison between light and scanning electron microscopy
    Trimby, PW
    Prior, DJ
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 1999, 303 (1-4) : 71 - 81
  • [5] Detection of Calcium Crystals in Knee Osteoarthritis Synovial Fluid A Comparison Between Polarized Light and Scanning Electron Microscopy
    Frallonardo, Paola
    Oliviero, Francesca
    Peruzzo, Luca
    Tauro, Leonardo
    Scanu, Anna
    Galozzi, Paola
    Ramonda, Roberta
    Punzi, Leonardo
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 22 (07) : 369 - 371
  • [6] Characterization of polymeric membranes by means of scanning force microscopy (SFM) in comparison to results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
    Kamusewitz, H
    SchossigTiedemann, M
    Keller, M
    Paul, D
    SURFACE SCIENCE, 1997, 377 (1-3) : 1076 - 1081
  • [7] PVD processes: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
    Mattox, DM
    PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 1998, 85 (07): : 38 - 39
  • [8] SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY (SEM) IN HEMOLYSIS
    ZAVAGLI, G
    RICCI, G
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1984, 12 (1-2) : 160 - 160
  • [9] High-resolution spin-polarized scanning electron microscopy (spin SEM)
    Joint Research Center for Atom Technology , Angstrom Technology Partnership , 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba
    305-0046, Japan
    不详
    185-8601, Japan
    不详
    305-8562, Japan
    不详
    305-8562, Japan
    不详
    305-0046, Japan
    Microsc., 2050, 1 (43-52):
  • [10] High-resolution spin-polarized scanning electron microscopy (spin SEM)
    Kohashi, Teruo
    Konoto, Makoto
    Koike, Kazuyuki
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, 2010, 59 (01): : 43 - 52