Completion of risk assessment and monitoring within forensic psychiatry

被引:0
|
作者
Galappathie, Nuwan [1 ]
Heeramun, Ragini [2 ]
Jethwa, Krishma [3 ]
机构
[1] St Andrews Healthcare, Birmingham B30 2XH, W Midlands, England
[2] W England Forens Mental Hlth Serv, Bristol, England
[3] Rehabil Serv, Bristol, England
关键词
D O I
10.1258/rsmmsl.49.2.88
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
There is a clear need for high standards of risk assessment and monitoring within forensic psychiatry. This has been highlighted by a number of high profile homicide enquires which have called for better standards of multidisciplinary risk assessment and monitoring. There are no national standards for risk assessment. We conducted a study to audit electronically the completion rate of a service-designed risk assessment document within Fromside, a medium secure unit, in the UK. The completion rates for key sections of 64 risk assessment documents were assessed. Only 48 of the 64 (75%) documents were electronically available. The completion rates ranged from 59/64 (92%) for the retrospective risk review to 46/64 (72%) for relapse indicators. Only 35/64 (55%) risk documents were updated within the last three months. We found that the use of risk profile documents has helped achieve good standards of risk assessment, however greater priority needs to be given to ongoing monitoring. We recommend that consideration is given to the development of national guidelines for multidisciplinary risk assessment and monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 92
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usefulness and practicality of structured risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatry
    Koenig, Andrej
    [J]. RECHT & PSYCHIATRIE, 2010, 28 (02): : 67 - 73
  • [2] Therapeutic drug monitoring in forensic psychiatry
    Hiemke, C.
    Laux, G.
    Saria, A.
    Zernig, G.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMAKOTHERAPIE, 2009, 16 (02): : 47 - 47
  • [3] THE USE OF COERCIVE MEASURES WITHIN FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY
    Hui, A.
    Middleton, H.
    Vollm, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27
  • [4] Shared Risk Formulation in Forensic Psychiatry
    Ray, Ipsita
    Simpson, Alexander I. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2019, 47 (01): : 22 - 28
  • [5] Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data
    Douglas, T.
    Pugh, J.
    Singh, I.
    Savulescu, J.
    Fazel, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 42 : 134 - 137
  • [6] Forensic Psychiatry: Symptoms, Assessment and Treatment between Psychiatry and Law
    Bilke-Hentsch, Oliver
    [J]. PRAXIS DER KINDERPSYCHOLOGIE UND KINDERPSYCHIATRIE, 2013, 62 (07) : 533 - 534
  • [7] Aggressive Personality and Aggressive Incidents: A Pilot Investigation of the Personality Assessment Inventory within Forensic Psychiatry
    Battaglia, Anthony M.
    Gicas, Kristina M.
    Rose, Alison L.
    Mamak, Mini
    Goldberg, Joel O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 32 (04): : 520 - 534
  • [8] A Future Foretold for Forensic Psychiatry: Toward Evidence-Based Risk Assessment and Prediction
    Nierenberg, Andrew A.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 2018, 48 (02) : 70 - 70
  • [9] Stereotypes of the assessment of patients in general and forensic psychiatry
    Lipsedge, M
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND RELATED SCIENCES, 1998, 35 (02): : 142 - 144
  • [10] Risk assessment by client and case manager for shared decision making in outpatient forensic psychiatry
    Rob H. S. van den Brink
    Nadine A. C. Troquete
    Harry Beintema
    Tamara Mulder
    Titus W. D. P. van Os
    Robert A. Schoevers
    Durk Wiersma
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 15