EU Border technologies and the co-production of security 'problems' and 'solutions'

被引:29
|
作者
Martins, Bruno Oliveira [1 ,2 ]
Jumbert, Maria Gabrielsen [1 ]
机构
[1] Peace Res Inst Oslo, Oslo, Norway
[2] Malmo Univ, Malmo Inst Studies Migrat Divers & Welf, Malmo, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Technology; border management; European Union; securitisation; expertise; drones; EUROPEAN-UNION; GOVERNANCE; EXPERTISE; KNOWLEDGE; SURVEILLANCE; POLITICS; DRONES; NEXUS;
D O I
10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851470
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
This article contributes to an understanding of how expert technological knowledge impacts the security-migration management nexus at the EU borders. It argues that recent migration flows augmented pre-existing dynamics of growing reliance upon technology in EU border management. These dynamics are assessed through a study of the way emerging technologies, in particular Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV, commonly known as drones), and specific information and surveillance technologies installed on them, have become increasingly understood as crucial for the management of migration into the EU. The article synthesises securitisation theory with Science and Technology Studies to show, first, how the values reflected in border technologies often encapsulate a securitised understanding of the migrant, and second, how the migrants arriving in Europe have been characterised as both potential security threats and as individuals in need of rescue and protection. These frames trigger securitisation dynamics that portray the migration issue as amenable to state-of-the-art technology. In this logic, security 'problems' and security 'solutions' are co-produced within a complex multi-layered network of public and private actors.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1447
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application and development of co-production technologies
    Li, Shuan
    [J]. Xiandai Huagong/Modern Chemical Industry, 2000, 20 (10): : 29 - 30
  • [2] Co-production: Power, problems and possibilities
    Gordon, Sarah
    O'Brien, Anthony John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2018, 27 (04) : 1201 - 1203
  • [3] Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies
    Bourne, Mike
    Johnson, Heather
    Lisle, Debbie
    [J]. SECURITY DIALOGUE, 2015, 46 (04) : 307 - 325
  • [4] The Role of the Police in the Co-production of Art Security in London
    Kerr, John
    [J]. POLICING-A JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 6 (04) : 443 - 452
  • [5] Between Public and Private: The Co-production of Infrastructural Security
    Nolte, Amina
    Westermeier, Carola
    [J]. POLITIKON, 2020, 47 (01) : 62 - 80
  • [6] The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation
    Lember, Veiko
    Brandsen, Taco
    Tonurist, Piret
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 21 (11) : 1665 - 1686
  • [7] The local co-production of Security in France: A deficient interinstitutional partnership
    Gautron, Virginie
    [J]. CHAMP PENAL-PENAL FIELD, 2010, 7
  • [8] The Wisdom of the Crowds and the Public Sphere: the co-production of solutions to public problems through ideas management platforms
    Monteiro Martins, Teresa Cristina
    Zambalde, Andre Luiz
    [J]. ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA E GESTAO SOCIAL, 2020, 12 (03):
  • [9] Embedding co-production of nature-based solutions in urban governance: Emerging co-production capacities in three European cities
    Holscher, Katharina
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Kindlon, Donnchadh
    Collier, Marcus J.
    Dick, Gillian
    Dziubala, Agnieszka
    Lodder, Marleen
    Osipiuk, Agnieszka
    Quartier, Mien
    Schepers, Selina
    Van De Sijpe, Katrien
    van der Have, Carien
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2024, 152
  • [10] Entangled security: Science, co-production, and intra-active insecurity
    Elbe, Stefan
    Buckland-Merrett, Gemma
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 2019, 4 (02) : 123 - 141