Patient comfort following FESS and Nasopore® packing, a double blind, prospective, randomized trial

被引:4
|
作者
Kastl, K. G. [1 ,2 ]
Reichert, M. [2 ]
Scheithauer, M. O. [2 ]
Sommer, F. [2 ]
Kisser, U. [3 ]
Braun, T. [3 ]
Havel, M. [3 ]
Leunig, A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] HNO Praxis 5 Seen Land, Gilching, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Univ Hosp Ulm, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
[3] Univ Munich, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Munich, Germany
[4] Dr Gaertner GmbH, HNO Klin Munchen Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
关键词
endoscopic sinus surgery; FESS; nasal packing; patient comfort; polyurethane packing; Nasopore (R); ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; NASAL PACKING; MIDDLE MEATUS; MEROCEL;
D O I
10.4193/Rhin13.020
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: The use of nasal packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is often associated with pain and a feeling of pressure for patients. The aim of the present work was to investigate a modern wound dressing made of polyurethane (Nasopore) that makes removal of the nasal packing unnecessary and is focussed on patient comfort. Methodology: Following bilateral FESS, after randomisation, one side was packed with Nasopore while the other side was without packing as a control. The following parameters from 47 patients were determined daily in two centres from post-operative day 1 for the duration of the inpatient stay in a double-blinded setting: side-specific post-operative bleeding, nasal breathing and feeling of pressure as well as the general parameters sleep disturbance, headaches and general well-being. Which side patients considered subjectively the better was also recorded. Results: No significant differences were determined between the two sides in terms of the rates of post-operative bleeding and nasal breathing. The feeling of pressure was slightly less on the side packed with Nasopore on post-operative days 2 and 3. No trend could be observed regarding which side patients described as being subjectively better. Conclusion: There were only slight differences in patient comfort between the Nasopore side and the control. Because the feeling of pressure in the midface was significantly less and there were no complications, this suggests there is greater patient comfort when using Nasopore (R) compared to using no nasal packing.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction using biodegradable (NasoPore) and non-biodegradable packing, a double-blind, prospective, randomized study
    Burduk, Pawel Krzysztof
    Wierzchowska, Malgorzata
    Grzeskowiak, Blazej
    Kazmierczak, Wojciech
    Wawrzyniak, Katarzyna
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 83 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [2] Clinical Effectiveness of Single Pigtail Suture Stent on Patient Comfort: A Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Trial
    Bostanci, Yakup
    Mercimek, Mehmet Necmettin
    Gulsen, Murat
    Ozden, Ender
    Yakupoglu, Yarkin Kamil
    Sarikaya, Saban
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (11): : 1183 - 1188
  • [3] Effect of the premedication with oral clonidine on surgical comfort in patients undergoing fess due to advanced nasal polyposis: A randomized double blind clinical trial
    Tugrul, Selahattin
    Dogan, Remzi
    Senturk, Erol
    Kocak, Ilker
    Sezen, Seda
    Bakan, Mefkur
    Ozturan, Orhan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 37 (06) : 538 - 543
  • [4] Impact of Preparatory Counseling on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Performance and Patient Comfort: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
    Muthusamy, Arunkumar
    Antaki, Fadi
    Judd, Stephanie
    Miller, Ashley
    Akintoye, Emmanuel
    Anees, Mohammad
    Schoenfeld, Philip S.
    Lilley, Kirthi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S301 - S301
  • [5] A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, AND DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL ON THE EFFECT OF FISH OIL ON THE INCIDENCE OF RESTENOSIS FOLLOWING PTCA
    FRANZEN, D
    SCHANNWELL, M
    OETTE, K
    HOPP, HW
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 28 (04): : 301 - 310
  • [6] Continuous epidural or intercostal analgesia following thoracotomy:: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial
    Debreceni, G
    Molnár, Z
    Szélig, L
    Molnár, TF
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (09) : 1091 - 1095
  • [7] Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial Evaluating Patient Satisfaction, Bleeding, and Wound Healing Using Biodegradable Synthetic Polyurethane Foam (NasoPore) as a Middle Meatal Spacer in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
    Shoman, Nael
    Gheriani, Heitham
    Flamer, David
    Javer, Amin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2009, 38 (01): : 112 - 118
  • [8] The prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial in orthopaedic surgery
    Clark, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (08): : 1119 - 1120
  • [9] ENTERAL FEEDING IN SEPSIS - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL
    CERRA, FB
    SHRONTS, EP
    KONSTANTINIDES, NN
    THOELE, S
    KONSTANTINIDES, FN
    TEASLEY, K
    LYSNE, J
    [J]. SURGERY, 1985, 98 (04) : 632 - 638
  • [10] Effect of Topical Steroid on Swallowing Following ACDF Results of a Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Control Trial
    Kim, Han Jo
    Alluri, Ram
    Stein, Dan
    Lebl, Darren
    Huang, Russel
    Lafage, Renaud
    Bennett, Tianna
    Lafage, Virginie
    Albert, Todd
    [J]. SPINE, 2021, 46 (07) : 413 - 420