Matched within-Patient Cohort Study of Transient Arterial Phase Respiratory Motion-related Artifact in MR Imaging of the Liver: Gadoxetate Disodium versus Gadobenate Dimeglumine

被引:97
|
作者
Davenport, Matthew S. [1 ]
Caoili, Elaine M. [1 ]
Kaza, Ravi K. [1 ]
Hussain, Hero K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
PROTOCOL OPTIMIZATION; LESION APPEARANCE; ENHANCED MRI;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.14132269
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare frequency and severity of arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact following gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine in matched patients administered both contrast media at different times. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained, with patient consent waived, for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study. Ninety patients underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) followed by gadoxetate disodium-enhanced abdominal MR and were matched to 90 patients who were administered the same contrast media in reverse order (180 patients). Matching was based on length of time between paired examinations. Gadobenate dimeglumine dose was weight based (0.1 mmol per kilogram body weight). Gadoxetate disodium dose was typically fixed (10 or 20 mL [off label]). Three readers blinded to contrast agent assigned a respiratory motion-related artifact score (1 [none] to 5 [nondiagnostic]) for nonenhanced, arterial, venous, and late dynamic phases. Frequency of greater new arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in each within-patient pair and aggregate rate of new severe transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact (scores <= 2, nonenhanced and venous and/or late dynamic phases; >= 4, arterial phase) were compared (McNemar test). Results: For groups 1 and 2, respectively, mean dose (gadoxetate disodium, 16.6 mL vs 16.6 mL, P = .99; gadobenate dimeglumine, 18.0 mL vs 17.8 mL, P = .77) and mean time between examinations (191 days vs 191 days, P = .99) were not significantly different between matched populations. Gadoxetate disodium was associated with significantly higher incidence of new arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact compared with gadobenate dimeglumine (39% vs 10%, P < .0001) and of new severe transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact (18% vs 2%, P < .0001) in patients administered both agents at different times. Conclusion: Fixed off-label dose (10 or 20 mL) of gadoxetate disodium is associated with arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact that is sometimes severe and occurs significantly more often than after gadobenate dimeglumine in patients who received both contrast media. (C) RSNA, 2014
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Respiratory Motion Artifact Affecting Hepatic Arterial Phase MR Imaging with Gadoxetate Disodium Is More Common in Patients with a Prior Episode of Arterial Phase Motion Associated with Gadoxetate Disodium
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Castelli, Patricia
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Larson, Douglas
    Marin, Daniele
    Hussain, Hero K.
    Jaffe, Tracy A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 274 (01) : 141 - 148
  • [2] CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-VIBE MR imaging of the liver at 3.0T with gadoxetate disodium: a solution for transient arterial-phase respiratory motion-related artifacts?
    Leonhard Gruber
    Vera Rainer
    Michaela Plaikner
    Christian Kremser
    Werner Jaschke
    Benjamin Henninger
    [J]. European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 2013 - 2021
  • [3] CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-VIBE MR imaging of the liver at 3.0T with gadoxetate disodium: a solution for transient arterial-phase respiratory motion-related artifacts?
    Gruber, Leonhard
    Rainer, Vera
    Plaikner, Michaela
    Kremser, Christian
    Jaschke, Werner
    Henninger, Benjamin
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (05) : 2013 - 2021
  • [4] Transient arterial phase respiratory motion-related artifact in MR imaging of the liver: an analysis of four different gadolinium-based contrast agents
    Shah, Mansi R.
    Flusberg, Milana
    Paroder, Viktoriya
    Rozenblit, Alla M.
    Chemyak, Victoria
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 41 : 23 - 27
  • [5] Transient Respiratory Motion Artifact During Arterial Phase MRI With Gadoxetate Disodium: Risk Factor Analyses
    Kim, So Yeon
    Park, Seong Ho
    Wu, En-Haw
    Wang, Z. Jane
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Chang, Wei-Chou
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (06) : 1220 - 1227
  • [6] Respiratory Motion Artifact Affecting Hepatic Arterial Phase Imaging with Gadoxetate Disodium: Examination Recovery with a Multiple Arterial Phase Acquisition
    Pietryga, Jason A.
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    Marin, Daniele
    Jaffe, Tracy A.
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2014, 271 (02) : 426 - 434
  • [7] Transient Respiratory-motion Artifact and Scan Timing during the Arterial Phase of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging: The Benefit of Shortened Acquisition and Multiple Arterial Phase Acquisition
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Sato, Kazuyuki
    Shimizu, Tatsuya
    Wakayama, Tetsuya
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 20 (03) : 280 - 289
  • [8] Fully automatic quantification of transient severe respiratory motion artifact of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI during arterial phase
    Jang, Jinseong
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Kim, Sungwon
    Hwang, Dosik
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (11) : 7247 - 7261
  • [9] Respiratory-motion artefacts in liver MRI following injection of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: an intra-individual comparative study in cirrhotic patients
    Furlan, A.
    Close, O. N.
    Borhani, A. A.
    Wu, Y. H.
    Heller, M. T.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) : 93.e1 - 93.e6
  • [10] Transient severe motion in the arterial phase during gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging: evaluation of patients with multiple MR examinations
    Im, Won Hyeong
    Song, Ji Soo
    Park, Eun Hae
    Kwak, Hyo Sung
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (10) : 2393 - 2401