Time-to-collision judgments under realistic driving conditions

被引:51
|
作者
Kiefer, Raymond J.
Flannagan, Carol A.
Jerome, Christian J.
机构
[1] Gen Motors, Struct & Safety Integrat Ctr, Warren, MI 48090 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Transportat Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1518/001872006777724499
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: This study examined perceived time to collision (TTC) with automobile drivers under realistic approach, rear-end crash scenario conditions. Background: TTC refers to the time before impact if prevailing conditions continue. Method: In this test track study involving 51 drivers ranging from 20 to 70 years old, the driver's vision was occluded at either 3.6 or 5.6 s TTC during an in-lane approach to a lead vehicle. Drivers provided TTC estimates by pressing a button the instant they felt that they would have collided with the vehicle ahead. Results: Results indicated that TTC was consistently underestimated. The TTC ratio (perceived TTC/actual TTC) increased as driver speed decreased and as relative speed increased. These ratios were largely unaffected by age, gender, actual TTC, viewing time (1 s vs. continuous), and the presence of an eyes-forward, mental addition distraction task. Conclusion: Overall, these results suggest that under these low TTC conditions drivers estimate TTC in a relatively uniform fashion and that they are capable of providing this estimate based on a brief glimpse to the vehicle ahead. Application: These results are being used to develop an alert timing approach for a forward collision warning system intended to assist drivers in avoiding rear-end crashes with the vehicle ahead.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 345
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does automated driving affect time-to-collision judgments?
    Lodinger, Natalie R.
    DeLucia, Patricia R.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 64 (25-37) : 25 - 37
  • [2] Semantic modulation of time-to-collision judgments
    Longo, Matthew
    Vagnoni, Eleonora
    [J]. COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2018, 19 : S20 - S20
  • [3] Semantic modulation of time-to-collision judgments
    Vagnoni, Eleonora
    Lingard, Lee
    Munro, Shanette
    Longo, Matthew R.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2020, 147
  • [4] Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments
    Eleonora Vagnoni
    Vasiliki Andreanidou
    Stella F. Lourenco
    Matthew R. Longo
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2017, 235 : 2729 - 2739
  • [5] Action ability modulates time-to-collision judgments
    Vagnoni, Eleonora
    Andreanidou, Vasiliki
    Lourenco, Stella F.
    Longo, Matthew R.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 235 (09) : 2729 - 2739
  • [6] Can Stroboscopic Training Improve Judgments of Time-to-Collision?
    Braly, Adam M.
    DeLucia, Patricia R.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2020, 62 (01) : 152 - 165
  • [7] Time-to-collision estimation in a simulated driving task
    Sidaway, B
    Fairweather, M
    Sekiya, H
    McNittGray, J
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 1996, 38 (01) : 101 - 113
  • [8] ESTIMATING TIME-TO-COLLISION
    KNOWLES, WB
    CAREL, WL
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1958, 13 (07) : 405 - 406
  • [9] Discrimination thresholds for time-to-collision
    Hecht, H.
    Landwehr, K.
    Baures, R.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2009, 38 : 98 - 98
  • [10] Time-to-collision and surface layout
    Harris, M. G.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1999, 28 : 4 - 4