Efficacy and safety of leflunomide 10 mg versus 20 mg once daily in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis:: multinational double-blind, randomized trial

被引:26
|
作者
Poór, G
Strand, V
机构
[1] Natl Inst Rheumatism & Physiotherapy, H-1023 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Stanford Univ, Div Immunol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
leflunomide; randomized clinical trial; rheumatoid arthritis; non-inferiority study;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keh168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety profile of two daily maintenance doses of leflunomide, 10 mg and 20 mg, for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. In this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, 402 RA patients were randomized equally to receive daily doses of 10 mg leflunomide (n = 202; loading dose on day 3, 100 mg) or 20 mg leflunomide (n = 200; loading dose on day 1-3, 100 mg) for 24 weeks. The study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the efficacy of 10 mg compared with 20 mg by calculating 95% confidence intervals for differences in changes in tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI), comparing these confidence intervals with predefined bounds. Results. In the intent-to-treat population, mean improvements at the end-point in the 10 and 20 mg groups respectively were: TJC, -7.57 and -8.89 (P = 0.061); SJC, -6.38 and -6.96 (P = 0.304); and HAQ DI, 0-0.37 and 0-0.49 (P = 0.095). By American College of Rheumatology (ACR) greater than or equal to20% criteria, response rates were 49.8 and 56.6% respectively (P = 0.1724). Adverse events (AEs) resulting in treatment withdrawal were higher in the 10 mg (15.3%) than in the 20 mg treatment group (12.0%), as were serious adverse events (SAEs): 12.9 vs 10.0%. Conclusions. This study rejected the hypothesis of non-inferiority of 10 mg compared with 20 mg daily maintenance doses of leflunomide. More AEs resulting in treatment discontinuation and SAEs in patients receiving 10 mg leflunomide daily also support a better efficacy profile for the 20 mg daily dose.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 749
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative trial of the efficacy and safety of leflunomide 10 mg vs. 20 mg daily dose in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis
    Poor, G
    Strand, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2003, 62 : 195 - 196
  • [2] A six-month double-blind trial to compare the efficacy and safety of meloxicam 7.5 mg daily and naproxen 750 mg daily in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Wojtulewski, JA
    Schattenkirchner, M
    Barcelo, P
    LeLoet, X
    Bevis, PJR
    Bluhmki, E
    Distel, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1996, 35 : 22 - 28
  • [3] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Hampel, F
    Howland, W
    Van Bavel, J
    Ratner, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 14 (01) : 56 - 63
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg Daily in Patients Hospitalized for Severe Depression: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial
    Brecht, Stephan
    Desaiah, Durisala
    Marechal, Elisete S.
    Santini, Ambra M.
    Podhorna, Jana
    Guelfi, Julien D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 72 (08) : 1086 - 1094
  • [5] Efficacy of leflunomide 100 mg weekly compared to low dose methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Double blind, randomized clinical trial
    Jaimes-Hernandez, Jorge
    Irene Melendez-Mercado, Claudia
    Mendoza-Fuentesa, Angelica
    Aranda-Pereira, Pablo
    Castaneda-Hernandez, Gilberto
    [J]. REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2012, 8 (05): : 243 - 249
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg compared to loratadine 10 mg once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Ratner, P
    Hampel, F
    Van Bavel, J
    Howland, W
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2004, 133 (04) : 371 - 379
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial
    Smolen, JS
    Kalden, JR
    Scott, DL
    Rozman, B
    Kvien, TK
    Larsen, A
    Loew-Friedrich, I
    Oed, C
    Rosenburg, R
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9149): : 259 - 266
  • [8] A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, MULTICENTER STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VONOPRAZAN (20 MG ONCE DAILY) COMPARED TO LANSOPRAZOLE (30 MG ONCE-DAILY) IN PATIENTS WITH EROSIVE ESOPHAGITIS (EE)
    Chen, Minhu
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Sheu, Bor-Shyang
    Chong, Chui Fung
    Funao, Nobuo
    Zhou, Wen
    Goh, Khean Lee
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S237 - S237
  • [9] Comparison of the efficacy of ebastine 10mg and 20mg once daily with that of cetirizine 10mg once daily in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis - A multicentre double-blind study
    Cohen, B
    Gehanno, P
    [J]. DRUGS, 1996, 52 : 26 - 29
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - A double-blind trial
    Yocum, DE
    Furst, DE
    Kaine, JL
    Baldassare, AR
    Stevenson, JT
    Borton, MA
    Mengle-Gaw, LJ
    Schwartz, BD
    Wisemandle, W
    Mekki, QA
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (12): : 3328 - 3337