A novel mixed binary linear DEA model for ranking decision-making units with preference information

被引:15
|
作者
Ebrahimi, Bohlool [1 ]
Tavana, Madjid [2 ,3 ]
Toloo, Mehdi [4 ,5 ]
Charles, Vincent [6 ]
机构
[1] Fernuniv, Hagen, Germany
[2] La Salle Univ, Business Syst & Analyt Dept, Business Analyt, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Univ Paderborn, Fac Business Adm & Econ, Business Informat Syst Dept, Paderborn, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Econ, Dept Syst Engn, Ostrava, Czech Republic
[5] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Operat Management & Business Stat, Muscat, Oman
[6] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; Efficient units; Decision-makers' preferences; Weight restrictions; Mixed binary linear programming; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENT UNIT; WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS; GENERALIZED-MODEL; VALUE JUDGMENTS; IMPRECISE DATA; DMUS; PERFORMANCE; TRANSITION; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2020.106720
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Several mixed binary linear programming models have been proposed in the literature to rank decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). However, some of these models fail to consider the decision-makers' preferences. We propose a new mixed binary linear DEA model for finding the most efficient DMU by considering the decision-makers' preferences. The model proposed in this study is motivated by the approach introduced by Toloo and Salahi (2018). We extend their model by introducing additional assurance region type I (ARI) weight restrictions (WRs) based on the decision-makers' preferences. We show that direct addition of assurance region type II (ARII) and absolute WRs in traditional DEA models leads to infeasibility and free production problems, and we prove ARI eliminates these problems. We also show our epsilon-free model is less complicated and requires less effort to determine the best efficient unit compared with the existing epsilon-based models in the literature. We provide two real-life applications to show the applicability and exhibit the efficacy of our model.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ranking decision-making units using common weights in DEA
    Ramezani-Tarkhorani, S.
    Khodabakhshi, M.
    Mehrabian, S.
    Nuri-Bahmani, F.
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2014, 38 (15-16) : 3890 - 3896
  • [2] Convex cone-based ranking of decision-making units in DEA
    Dehnokhalaji, Akram
    Hallaji, Behjat
    Soltani, Narges
    Sadeghi, Jafar
    OR SPECTRUM, 2017, 39 (03) : 861 - 880
  • [3] Convex cone-based ranking of decision-making units in DEA
    Akram Dehnokhalaji
    Behjat Hallaji
    Narges Soltani
    Jafar Sadeghi
    OR Spectrum, 2017, 39 : 861 - 880
  • [4] A new DEA-based method for fully ranking all decision-making units
    Du, Juan
    Liang, Liang
    Yang, Feng
    Bi, Gong-Bing
    Yu, Xiao-Bo
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2010, 27 (05) : 363 - 373
  • [5] PRIORITIZATION MODELS FOR FRONTIER DECISION-MAKING UNITS IN DEA
    COOK, WD
    KRESS, M
    SEIFORD, LM
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 59 (02) : 319 - 323
  • [6] DECISION-MAKING, NEW INFORMATION, RANKING AND STRUCTURE
    SAATY, TL
    MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 8 : 125 - 132
  • [7] EVALUATION OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS BASED ON THE WEIGHT-OPTIMIZED DEA MODEL
    Sun, Jiasen
    Yang, Rui
    Ji, Xiang
    Wu, Jie
    KYBERNETIKA, 2017, 53 (02) : 244 - 262
  • [8] Ranking of decision making units using the imperialist competitive algorithm in DEA
    Keshteli, Hasan Babaei
    Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, Mohsen
    Lotfi, Farhad Hosseinzadeh
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2021, 54 (9-10): : 1326 - 1335
  • [9] RANKING DECISION MAKING UNITS BY MEANS OF SOFT COMPUTING DEA MODELS
    Bosca, Jose E.
    Liern, Vicente
    Sala, Ramon
    Martinez, Aurelio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2011, 19 (01) : 115 - 134
  • [10] Multiple Criteria Decision-Making: A Novel Applications of Network DEA Model
    Chen, Chang-Hsu
    Lin, Wen-Bin
    Yang, Shih-Chieh
    Hsiao, Richard
    PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (11) : 1 - 14