Efficacy and safety of maraviroc vs. efavirenz in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1: 5-year findings

被引:31
|
作者
Cooper, David A. [1 ]
Heera, Jayvant [2 ]
Ive, Prudence [3 ]
Botes, Mariette
Dejesus, Edwin [4 ]
Burnside, Robert [2 ]
Clumeck, Nathan [5 ]
Walmsley, Sharon [6 ]
Lazzarin, Adriano [7 ]
Mukwaya, Geoffrey [8 ]
Saag, Michael [9 ]
van der Ryst, Elna [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Kirby Inst, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Orlando Immunol Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[5] Hop Univ St Pierre, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Ist Sci San Raffaele, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[8] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[9] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[10] Pfizer Global Res & Dev, Sandwich, Kent, England
关键词
long term; antiretroviral therapy; maraviroc; HIV-1; treatment-naive; randomized controlled trial; efavirenz; TREATMENT-EXPERIENCED PATIENTS; IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS TYPE-1; CHEMOKINE RECEPTOR CCR5; CLINICAL-TRIALS; REDUCED RISK; INFECTION; DEFICIENCY; HEPATOTOXICITY; INDIVIDUALS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1097/QAD.0000000000000131
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective: Maraviroc, a chemokine co-receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonist, has demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to efavirenz, each in combination with zidovudine/lamivudine, over 96 weeks in the Maraviroc vs. Efavirenz Regimens as Initial Therapy (MERIT) study. Here we report 5-year findings. Design: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase IIb/III study with an open-label extension phase. Methods: Treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection (Trofile) received maraviroc 300 mg twice daily or efavirenz 600 mg once daily, and zidovudine/lamivudine 300 mg/150 mg twice daily. After the last patient's week 96 visit, the study was unblinded and patients could enter a nominal 3-year open-label phase. Endpoints at the 5-year nominal visit (week 240) included proportion of patients (CCR5 tropism re-confirmed by enhanced sensitivity Trofile) with viral load (plasma HIV-1 RNA) below 50 and 400 copies/ml, and change from baseline in CD4(+) cell count, as well as safety. Results: The proportion of patients maintaining viral load below 50 copies/ml was similar between treatment arms throughout the study and at week 240 (maraviroc 50.8% vs. efavirenz 45.9%). Maraviroc-treated patients had a greater increase from baseline in mean CD4(+) cell count than efavirenz-treated patients at week 240 (293 vs. 271 cells/mu l, respectively). Fewer patients on maraviroc vs. efavirenz experienced treatment-related adverse events (68.9 vs. 81.7%) and discontinued as a result of any adverse event (10.6 vs. 21.3%). Conclusion: Maraviroc maintained similar long-term antiviral efficacy to efavirenz over 5 years in treatment-naive patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1. Maraviroc was generally well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings or evidence of long-term safety concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 725
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and Efficacy of Coformulated Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Single-Tablet Regimen in Treatment-Naive Patients Infected with HIV-1
    Gallien, Sebastien
    Flandre, Philippe
    Nga Nguyen
    De Castro, Nathalie
    Molina, Jean-Michel
    Delaugerre, Constance
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2015, 87 (02) : 187 - 191
  • [2] Efavirenz Therapeutic Range in HIV-1 Treatment-Naive Participants
    Bednasz, Cindy J.
    Venuto, Charles S.
    Ma, Qing
    Daar, Eric S.
    Sax, Paul E.
    Fischl, Margaret A.
    Collier, Ann C.
    Smith, Kimberly Y.
    Tierney, Camlin
    Yang, Yang
    Wilding, Gregory E.
    Morse, Gene D.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2017, 39 (06) : 596 - 603
  • [3] Durable Efficacy and Safety of Raltegravir Versus Efavirenz When Combined With Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Treatment-Naive HIV-1-Infected Patients: Final 5-Year Results From STARTMRK
    Rockstroh, Juergen K.
    DeJesus, Edwin
    Lennox, Jeffrey L.
    Yazdanpanah, Yazdan
    Saag, Michael S.
    Wan, Hong
    Rodgers, Anthony J.
    Walker, Monica L.
    Miller, Michael
    DiNubile, Mark J.
    Nguyen, Bach-Yen
    Teppler, Hedy
    Leavitt, Randi
    Sklar, Peter
    [J]. JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2013, 63 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [4] Maraviroc for Treatment-Naive Patients with HIV-1 Infection: Is the Glass Half Empty or Half Full?
    Sax, Paul E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 201 (06): : 797 - 799
  • [5] RaltegravirIn Treatment-Naive Patients with HIV-1 Infection
    Jamie D. Croxtall
    Lesley J. Scott
    [J]. Drugs, 2010, 70 : 631 - 642
  • [6] Raltegravir In Treatment-Naive Patients with HIV-1 Infection
    Croxtall, Jamie D.
    Scott, Lesley J.
    [J]. DRUGS, 2010, 70 (05) : 631 - 642
  • [7] Comparative efficacy and safety of dolutegravir and lamivudine in treatment-naive HIV patients
    Radford, M.
    Parks, D.
    Ferrante, S.
    Punekar, Y.
    [J]. HIV MEDICINE, 2019, 20 : 18 - 18
  • [8] Antiretroviral therapy options for treatment-naive patients with HIV-1
    Hedley, Lucy
    Minton, June
    Wallis, Gabriel
    Waters, Laura
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2015, 76 (08) : C122 - C125
  • [9] Neurological and psychiatric tolerability of rilpivirine (TMC278) vs. efavirenz in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients at 48 weeks
    Mills, A. M.
    Antinori, A.
    Clotet, B.
    Fourie, J.
    Herrera, G.
    Hicks, C.
    Madruga, J. V.
    Vanveggel, S.
    Stevens, M.
    Boven, K.
    [J]. HIV MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (07) : 391 - 400
  • [10] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ELVITEGRAVIR/COBICISTAT/EMTRICITABINE/TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE IN TREATMENT-NAIVE JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH HIV-1 INFECTION
    Yajima, K.
    Yagura, H.
    Yukawa, S.
    Hirota, K.
    Ikuma, M.
    Kasai, D.
    Watanabe, D.
    Nishida, Y.
    Uehira, T.
    Shirasaka, T.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2015, 91 : A237 - A237