Quantification of Precipitation and Evapotranspiration Uncertainty in Rainfall-Runoff Modeling

被引:3
|
作者
Baig, Faisal [1 ,2 ]
Sherif, Mohsen [1 ,2 ]
Faiz, Muhammad Abrar [2 ]
机构
[1] UAE Univ, Coll Engn, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, POB 15551, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
[2] UAE Univ, Natl Water & Energy Ctr, POB 15551, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
uncertainty; hydrological modeling; NAM; DREAM; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; SATELLITE; CALIBRATION; MULTIPLE;
D O I
10.3390/hydrology9030051
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Mountainous watersheds have always been a challenge for modelers due to large variability and insufficient ground observations, which cause forcing data, model structure, and parameter uncertainty. This study employed Differential Evolution Adaptive Metropolis (DREAM) algorithm which utilizes Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach to account for forcing data uncertainty. A conceptual degree day snowmelt model, MIKE 11 NAM (Nedbor Afstromnings Model), was used to simulate snowmelt runoff from Ilgaz basin, with an area of 28.4 km(2) area, located in the northern part of Turkey. The mean elevation is around 1700 m and the basin is covered with broadleaf forest and has mainly brown soil with a high water holding capacity. Precipitation and evapotranspiration (ET) values were optimized in combination with model parameters conditioned on observed discharges and corrected values of input data were utilized for calibration and validation. Results showed that the observed precipitation was over-estimated by almost 10%, while evapotranspiration calculated by Penman-Monteith method was underestimated. The mean values of storm and ET multipliers were obtained as 1.14 and 0.84, respectively. When only parameter uncertainty was considered, calibration did not yield Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) greater than 0.64. However, when forcing data uncertainty was incorporated in the DREAM approach, an improved value of NSE (0.84) was obtained. After calibration and treatment of forcing data errors, the model yielded reasonable prediction uncertainty bounds and well-defined posterior distributions of NAM model parameters. Main objectives of the study are to assess the applicability of MIKE 11 NAM model to the selected catchment. In addition, the importance of errors in the input forcing variables to the model is demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE APPLICABILITY OF MORTON AND PENMAN EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING
    CHIEW, FHS
    MCMAHON, TA
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1991, 27 (04): : 611 - 620
  • [2] Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall-runoff modeling
    Klotz, Daniel
    Kratzert, Frederik
    Gauch, Martin
    Sampson, Alden Keefe
    Brandstetter, Johannes
    Klambauer, Gunter
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    Nearing, Grey
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (06) : 1673 - 1693
  • [3] THE APPLICABILITY OF MORTON AND PENMAN EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES IN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING - DISCUSSION
    KITE, GW
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1992, 28 (03): : 637 - 637
  • [4] Impact of runoff measurement error models on the quantification of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff models
    Thyer, M. A.
    Renard, B.
    Kavetski, D.
    Kuczera, G.
    [J]. 18TH WORLD IMACS CONGRESS AND MODSIM09 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: INTERFACING MODELLING AND SIMULATION WITH MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCES, 2009, : 3414 - 3420
  • [5] Treatment of precipitation uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modelling: a fuzzy set approach
    Maskey, S
    Guinot, V
    Price, RK
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2004, 27 (09) : 889 - 898
  • [6] Benchmarking quantitative precipitation estimation by conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling
    Heistermann, Maik
    Kneis, David
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [7] PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION ANALYSIS FOR URBAN RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING
    LEI, JH
    SCHILLING, W
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 29 (1-2) : 145 - 154
  • [8] Parameter uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling for polder system design
    Yulianti, JS
    Lence, BJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1999, 35 (02): : 245 - 251
  • [9] Development of a possibilistic method for the evaluation of predictive uncertainty in rainfall-runoff modeling
    Jacquin, Alexandra P.
    Shamseldin, Asaad Y.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (04)
  • [10] Ascertaining evapotranspiration series by the optimized rainfall-runoff model
    Chlumecky, M.
    Tesar, M.
    Buchtele, J.
    [J]. BOLETIN GEOLOGICO Y MINERO, 2018, 129 (03): : 487 - 497