Process of conducting a 5-a-Day intervention with high school students: Gimme 5 (Louisiana)

被引:28
|
作者
Nicklas, TA
O'Neil, CE
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Childrens Nutr Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Human Ecol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/109019810002700206
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Gimme 5: A Fresh Nutrition Concept for Students (Gimme 5) was a 4-year intervention targeting increased fruit and vegetable consumption by high school students. Twelve schools were randomized to intervention or control conditions. The cohort (2,213 students; 56% female, 84% Euro-American) were followed from 9th to 12th grade. Interventions were composed of a school-based media campaign, classroom workshops, school meal modification, and parental involvement. For each of the four Gimme 5 intervention components, process evaluation measures were developed to assess program dose, penetration, and utilization, as well as external competing factors. Process evaluation results are presented to illustrate the various functions of process evaluation data. These include, but are not limited to, describing program implementation, quality control and monitoring, and explaining study outcomes. The implementation of process evaluation systems to complement the outcome measures in a high school-based intervention provides useful strategies for a more comprehensive approach to program evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 212
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a school-based nutrition intervention for high school students: Gimme 5
    Nicklas, TA
    Johnson, CC
    Farris, R
    Rice, R
    Lyon, L
    Shi, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1997, 11 (05) : 315 - 322
  • [2] Gimme 5: An innovative, school-based nutrition intervention for high school students
    O'Neil, CE
    Nicklas, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2002, 102 (03) : S93 - S96
  • [3] Process evaluations of the 5-a-Day projects
    Baranowski, T
    Stables, G
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [4] Contrasting mediating variables in two 5-a-day nutrition intervention programs
    Reynolds, KD
    Bishop, DB
    Chou, CP
    Xie, B
    Nebeling, L
    Perry, CL
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 39 (05) : 882 - 893
  • [5] Process tracking results from the Treatwell 5-a-day worksite study
    Hunt, MK
    Lederman, R
    Stoddard, A
    Potter, S
    Phillips, J
    Sorensen, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2000, 14 (03) : 179 - 187
  • [6] Uses of process evaluation in the Maryland WIC 5-a-Day Promotion Program
    Havas, S
    Anliker, J
    Damron, D
    Feldman, R
    Langenberg, P
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 254 - 263
  • [7] Seattle 5-a-Day Work-Site Project: Process evaluation
    Beresford, SAA
    Shannon, J
    McLerran, D
    Thompson, B
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 213 - 222
  • [8] Boy Scout 5-a-Day Badge: Outcome results of a troop and Internet intervention
    Thompson, Debbe
    Baranowski, Tom
    Baranowski, Janice
    Cullen, Karen
    Jago, Russell
    Watson, Kathy
    Liu, Yan
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 49 (06) : 518 - 526
  • [9] 5-a-Day Power Plus: Process evaluation of a multicomponent elementary school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption
    Story, M
    Mays, RW
    Bishop, DB
    Perry, CL
    Taylor, G
    Smyth, M
    Gray, C
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2000, 27 (02) : 187 - 200
  • [10] Fruit and vegetable ingredients: Advancing the 5-a-day message
    Pszczola, DE
    [J]. FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 51 (07) : 127 - 128