The industrial life cycle of wind energy electrical power generation ARI methodology modeling of life cycle dynamics

被引:26
|
作者
Dismukes, John P. [1 ]
Miller, Lawrence K. [2 ]
Bers, John A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Coll Engn, Dept Environm Chem & Engn, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Coll Engn, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Engn, Engn Management Program, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
Wind electrical power; ARI methodology; Industrial life cycle; Modeling innovation dynamics; OF-THE-ART; RENEWABLE ENERGY; RADICAL INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGIES; POLICY; FRAMEWORK; GERMANY; KEY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This innovation assessment addresses the factors that have influenced the exceptionally lengthy industrial technology life cycle of wind electrical power generation since its inception in the late 19th Century. It then applies the recently developed Accelerated Radical Innovation (ARI) Model to understand the dynamics of this innovation compared to those of other major 18th-20th Century innovations. Despite market pull in the late 19th Century to link small DC electrical generators with hundreds of thousands of existing wind mills used for mechanical water pumping, several factors prevented this from happening. These include the intermittent nature of wind electrical generation requiring low cost battery storage and DC-AC conversion, and the shift in the 1890s from DC to superior AC electrical generation making possible economies of scale for delivering AC electricity long distances over the grid from large hydroelectric and coal fired plants. As a consequence, wind generated electricity remained primarily a technological development until the first energy crisis in the 1970s. Development of an extensive science and technology base for wind turbine dynamics, and deployment since 2000 of commercial scale wind turbines (> 1MW) have elevated wind electrical power generation to commercial practicality, as described in two earlier papers by the authors applying technical cost modeling and experience curve projections of cost of energy (COE) to explore the economic viability of large scale wind electricity generation.. Strongly promoted by wind energy communities of practice in Europe, North America and Asia, normative COE projections suggest that by 2020 wind electrical power will be cost competitive, without tax incentives, with electricity from conventional fossil and nuclear fuel sources. Overcoming technological, business, markets societal, networking and political hurdles to date has required 120years of development to establish wind electricity generation as a breakthrough innovation with the capability to capture 20% of the world electricity market by the mid-to-late 21st Century. Further growth and maturation is expected to continue to 2100, corresponding to a projected congruent to 210year overall industry life cycle at market saturation. This finding has profound implications for innovation theory and practice, since the length of this life cycle exceeds by a factor of congruent to 4 the average life cycle diagnosed for five industrial revolutions and four key 20th Century innovations. The new ARI model provides a holistic approach to understanding the dynamics of the industrial technology life cycle for a wide variety of radical innovations as well as wind electrical power. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 191
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Wind energy electrical power generation: Industrial life cycle of a radical innovation
    Dismukes, John P.
    Miller, Lawrence K.
    Solocha, Andrew
    Jagani, Sandeep
    Bers, John A.
    [J]. PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 773 - +
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Wind Power Generation: Application of the Methodology and the Generator to Power System
    da Silva, Mozart Tavares
    Rebutini, Vanessa Zadorosnei
    Mancini, Fabrizio Nicolai
    [J]. BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 61
  • [3] The Inclusion of End-of-Life Modeling in the Life Cycle Energy Optimization Methodology
    Bouchouireb, Hamza
    Jank, Merle-Hendrikje
    O'Reilly, Ciaran J.
    Goransson, Peter
    Schoeggl, Josef-Peter
    Baumgartner, Rupert J.
    Potting, Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2021, 143 (05)
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of a SOFC system for distributed power generation
    Strazza, Carlo
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Costamagna, Paola
    Gallo, Michela
    Brignole, Emma
    Girdinio, Paola
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 100 : 64 - 77
  • [5] Comparative life cycle energy, emission, and economic analysis of 100 kW nameplate wind power generation
    Kabir, Md Ruhul
    Rooke, Braden
    Dassanayake, G. D. Malinga
    Fleck, Brian A.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 37 (01) : 133 - 141
  • [6] LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND TECHNOECONOMIC MODELING OF AN ENERGY GENERATION SYSTEM
    Kabli, Mohammad
    Taylan, Osman
    Bakhsh, Ahmad
    Calhan, Rahman
    Yilmaz, Mustafa Tahsin
    Kaya, Durmus
    Canka Kilic, Fatma
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOSYSTEMS AND ECOLOGY SCIENCE-IJEES, 2020, 10 (02): : 305 - 316
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of energy generation in Poland
    Lukasz Lelek
    Joanna Kulczycka
    Anna Lewandowska
    Joanna Zarebska
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 1 - 14
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of energy generation in Poland
    Lelek, Lukasz
    Kulczycka, Joanna
    Lewandowska, Anna
    Zarebska, Joanna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [9] Life cycle assessment and net energy analysis of offshore wind power systems
    Huang, Yu-Fong
    Can, Xing-Jia
    Chiueh, Pei-Te
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 102 : 98 - 106
  • [10] Development of a methodology for life cycle building energy ratings
    Hernandez, Patxi
    Kenny, Paul
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (06) : 3779 - 3788