Corporate Sustainability and Stock Returns

被引:0
|
作者
Boasson, Vigdis [1 ]
Boasson, Emil [2 ]
Mitchell, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Finance & Law, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
[2] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Business Informat Syst, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effects of corporate sustainability initiatives for climate change on stock returns and firm value. This research is motivated by the recent severe climate change events that led to devastating human and financial losses. Just at the beginning of this century, most investors would not have put climate change into their asset pricing equation. Over the last few years, however, we have witnessed drought, crop loss, wildfire, ice-melt, hurricanes, and severe climate change. Just in the dragon year of 2012, Hurricane Sandy brought New York City, the world's largest financial center and most of the east coast under water. Traditional asset pricing model focuses essentially on the market-risk premium factor. We can no longer assume that climate change topic does not belong to the research area of capital market and asset pricing. In this study, we measure the abnormal stock returns using a six-factor model that incorporates 1) market risk-premium, 2) small firm factor, 3) value stock factor, 4) momentum factor, 5) liquidity factor, and last, but certainly not the least 6) sustainability factor. By inserting this new factor into the traditional asset pricing model, we contribute to the financial literature as well as to corporate sustainability literature. The findings of this research may also shed light on investment strategies that could adapt to climate change. Our sample consists of 3000 publicly-traded companies in the KLD database matched with financial data from Compustat and CRSP files for the period of 1991-2012. We employ a combination of KLD data and ClimateCount scores to measure the performance of corporate sustainability initiatives. We hypothesize 1) climate change affects investor sentiment which in turn affects stock returns; 2) companies with commitment to sustainability and taking initiatives to address climate change may lead to better risk-adjusted stock returns and firm value; 3) corporate sustainability factor may have certain explanatory power for asset pricing.
引用
收藏
页码:1612 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CORPORATE FOCUS AND STOCK RETURNS
    COMMENT, R
    JARRELL, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (01) : 67 - 87
  • [2] Corporate governance and the variability of stock returns
    Koerniadi, Hardjo
    Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar
    Tourani-Rad, Alireza
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2014, 10 (04) : 494 - +
  • [3] Corporate Political Contributions and Stock Returns
    Cooper, Michael J.
    Gulen, Huseyin
    Ovtchinnikov, Alexei V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (02): : 687 - 724
  • [4] Corporate hedging and the variance of stock returns
    Biguri, Kizkitza
    Brownlees, Christian
    Ippolito, Filippo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 72
  • [5] Predictable Corporate Distributions and Stock Returns
    Bessembinder, Hendrik
    Zhang, Feng
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2015, 28 (04): : 1199 - 1241
  • [6] Corporate governance and stock returns in Asia
    Kouwenberg, Roy
    Salomons, Roelof
    Thontirawong, Pipat
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2014, 14 (06) : 965 - 976
  • [7] Corporate taxes, partisan politics, and stock returns
    Mella, Javier
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2024, 72
  • [8] Corporate Catastrophes, Stock Returns, and Trading Volume
    Knight R.F.
    Pretty D.J.
    [J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 1999, 2 (4) : 363 - 378
  • [9] Technology spillover, corporate investment, and stock returns
    Hsu, Yen-Ju
    Wang, Yanzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2023, 73 : 238 - 250
  • [10] Corporate misconduct, media coverage, and stock returns
    Kim, Hee-Eun
    Jo, Hoje
    Ahn, Tae-Wook
    Yi, Junesuh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 84