Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen - Planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced

被引:229
|
作者
Miller, PR [1 ]
Meredith, JW [1 ]
Johnson, JC [1 ]
Chang, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000124291.09032.bf
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The goal of this report is to examine the success of vacuum-assisted fascial closure (VAFC) under a carefully applied protocol in abdominal closure after open abdomen. Summary Background Data: With the development of damage control techniques and the understanding of abdominal compartment syndrome, the open abdomen has become commonplace in trauma patients. If the abdomen is not closed in the early postoperative period, the combination of adhesions and fascial retraction frequently make primary fascial closure impossible and creation of a planned ventral hernia is required. We have previously reported our experience with the development of a technique for VAFC that allowed for closure of the fascia in many such patients long after initial operation. During this previous study, during which the technique was being developed, VAFC was successful in 69% of patients in whom it was applied, and 22 patients were successfully closed at greater than or equal to 9 days after initial surgery (range, 9 to 49 days). A protocol for the use of VAFC in patients with open abdomen was developed on the basis of these data and has been employed since October 2001. The outcome of this protocol's use is examined. Methods: This is a prospective evaluation of all trauma patients admitted to Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center over a 19-month period who required management with an open abdomen. VAFC employs suction applied to a large polyurethane sponge under an occlusive dressing in the wound and allows for constant medial traction of the abdominal fascia. It is attempted in all patients in whom the rectus muscles and fascia are intact. Studied variables include fascial closure rate, time to closure, incidence of wound dehiscence, and hernia development after closure. Results: From November 1, 2001, through May 31, 2003, 212 laparotomies were performed in injured patients; 53 (25%) of these patients required open abdomen management. Mean injury severity score for the group was 34, with an average abdominal abbreviated injury score of 2.9. Forty-five (78%) survived until abdominal closure. Vacuum dressings were used in all 45 but VAFC was not attempted in 2 patients (I due to development of enterocutaneous fistula, I because a rectus flap was used for another wound). Closure rate in those undergoing VAFC was 88% (38), with mean time to closure being 9.5 days. This is significantly higher than the 69% rate of fascia] closure during the time in which the technique was developed (P = 0.03). Twenty-one patients (48%) were closed at : 9 days (range, 9 to 21 days). Two patients (4.6%) developed wound dehiscence and underwent successful reclosure. One patient (2.3%) developed a ventral hernia on follow-up, which has since been repaired Conclusions: The use of VAFC under a carefully defined protocol has resulted in significantly higher fascial closure rates, obviating the need for subsequent hernia repair in most patients. The utility of this technique is not limited to the early postoperative period, but it can be successful as much as 3 to 4 weeks after initial operation.
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 614
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen - Planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced - Discussion
    Fabian, TC
    Maxwell, R
    Richardson, JD
    Miller, P
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (05) : 614 - 616
  • [2] Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen: planned ventral hernia rate is substantially reduced(Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC, Chang MC, Ann Surg 239: 608–614, 2004)
    S. Stremitzer
    C. Zeisel
    T. Hölzenbein
    T. Sautner
    T. Wild
    European Surgery, 2004, 36 (4) : 266 - 267
  • [3] Retrospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis
    Hahn, R.
    Kettner, S. K.
    Wild, Th.
    Spiss, C.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2007, 62 : 294 - 294
  • [4] Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction
    Acosta, S.
    Bjarnason, T.
    Petersson, U.
    Palsson, B.
    Wanhainen, A.
    Svensson, M.
    Djavani, K.
    Bjorck, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (05) : 735 - 743
  • [5] VACUUM-ASSISTED FASCIAL CLOSURE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF OPEN ABDOMEN. THE OPTIMAL FOAM'S POSITION
    Zanellato, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [6] Temporary Vacuum-Assisted Closure of the Open Abdomen in Neonates
    Hattori, Kengo
    Numanoglu, Alp
    Cox, Sharon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 27 (05) : 437 - 442
  • [7] Quality of life and hernia development 5 years after open abdomen treatment with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction
    U. Petersson
    T. Bjarnason
    M. Björck
    A. Montgomery
    P. Rogmark
    M. Svensson
    K. Sörelius
    S. Acosta
    Hernia, 2016, 20 : 755 - 764
  • [8] Quality of life and hernia development 5 years after open abdomen treatment with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction
    Petersson, U.
    Bjarnason, T.
    Bjorck, M.
    Montgomery, A.
    Rogmark, P.
    Svensson, M.
    Sorelius, K.
    Acosta, S.
    HERNIA, 2016, 20 (05) : 755 - 764
  • [9] Management of the open abdomen using vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction
    Willms, A.
    Guesgen, C.
    Schaaf, S.
    Bieler, D.
    von Websky, M.
    Schwab, R.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2015, 400 (01) : 91 - 99
  • [10] Management of the open abdomen using vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction
    A. Willms
    C. Güsgen
    S. Schaaf
    D. Bieler
    M. von Websky
    R. Schwab
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2015, 400 : 91 - 99