Improving evidence-based practice in rehabilitation:: Introducing PsycBITE™

被引:2
|
作者
McDonald, S [1 ]
Tate, R
Togher, L
Perdices, M
Moseley, A
Winders, K
Shultz, R
Smith, K
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Royal Rehabil Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Royal N Shore Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02687030600724861
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Clinicians face significant obstacles in their access to evidence for the efficacy of different communicative and cognitive treatments after brain impairment. These include the need to search across diverse journals and different clinical conditions to find potential treatments and the lack of easily accessible standards by which to evaluate the methodological rigour of treatment studies once found. Aims: We aimed to address these issues by developing a freely available, user-friendly database of all relevant treatment trials for psychologically based disorders that arise from brain impairment. Methods & Procedures: PsycBITE (TM) (http://www.psycbite.com) was developed as an internet-based database and was officially launched in 2004. Included on PsycBITE (TM) are all trials that have been published that evaluate treatment for any communication, cognitive, or psychological disorder arising from any form of acquired brain impairment in children (above the age of 5 years) and adults. PsycBITE (TM) also provides a rating for the methodological rigour of each trial using the previously established PEDro scale (Maher, Sherrington, Herbert, Moseley, & Elkins, 2003) for randomised controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCT group comparisons. A PsycBITE (TM) rating scale for single case experimental studies is still under development. This report overviews the database, its contents, and the methodology by which papers are selected for inclusion. Outcomes & Results: As of June 2005 there are 1167 treatment studies listed on PsycBITE (TM) with prospective searches being conducted on a regular basis. The highest proportion of studies report treatments for communication disorders followed by behavioural problems and memory. Ratings of the randomised controlled trials, group comparisons, and single case studies are available for a proportion of papers and are being updated continuously. Conclusions: PsycBITE (TM) is an invaluable resource for clinicians and researchers interested in an evidence-based practice approach to treatment. It is a free, fast, and effective way of accessing and evaluating treatments for communicative and cognitive disorders following brain impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 683
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence-based practice in rehabilitation nursing
    Pierce, Linda L.
    [J]. REHABILITATION NURSING, 2007, 32 (05) : 203 - 209
  • [2] EVIDENCE-BASED REHABILITATION: A GUIDE TO PRACTICE
    Provident, Ingrid
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 20 (01) : 91 - 92
  • [3] Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice
    Fasoli, SE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2003, 57 (04): : 478 - 479
  • [4] Evidence-based practice recommendations for memory rehabilitation
    Piras, F.
    Borella, E.
    Incoccia, C.
    Carlesimo, G. A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2011, 47 (01) : 149 - 175
  • [5] Evidence-based practice and the limits of rational rehabilitation
    Cicerone, KD
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (06): : 1073 - 1074
  • [6] Evidence-based practice in the provision of rehabilitation services
    Chubon, Robert
    Degeneffe, Charles
    Donnell, Chandra
    Fabian, Ellen
    Garske, Greg
    Gervey, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION, 2008, 74 (02) : 3 - 5
  • [7] Introducing Students to Evidence-Based Practice and Quality Measures
    House, Sheryl Katherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2014, 53 (03)
  • [8] The role of external validity in evidence-based practice for rehabilitation
    Schutz, Larry E.
    Rivers, Kenyatta O.
    Ratusnik, David L.
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 53 (03) : 294 - 302
  • [9] Evidence-Based Practice for Rehabilitation Professionals: Concepts and Controversies
    Dijkers, Marcel P.
    Murphy, Susan L.
    Krellman, Jason
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (08): : S164 - S176
  • [10] Ethical and evidence-based practice in brain injury rehabilitation
    Malec, James F.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2009, 19 (06) : 790 - 806