Endocavitary contact radiation therapy for ultrasonographically staged T1 N0 and T2 N0 rectal cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Christoforidis, D. [1 ,4 ]
McNally, M. P. [1 ,3 ]
Jarosek, S. L. [2 ]
Madoff, R. D. [1 ]
Finne, C. O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[3] Natl Naval Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] CHU Vaudois, Dept Surg, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
INTRACAVITARY IRRADIATION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; TRANSANAL EXCISION; LOCAL EXCISION; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURGERY; SALVAGE; SERIES;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.6478
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing endocavitary contact radiation therapy (ECR) for stage I rectal cancer. Methods: A database of patients treated with ECR for biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma from July 1986 to June 2006 was reviewed retrospectively. Only patients with primary, non-metastatic, ultrasonographically staged T1 N0 and T2 N0 cancer who had no adjuvant treatment were included. Patients received a median of 90 (range 60-190) Gy contact radiation, delivered transanally by a 50-kV X-ray tube in two to five fractions. Results: Of 149 patients, 77 (40 T1, 37 T2) met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 74 (range 38-104) years, and median follow-up 69 (range 10-219) months. ECR failed in 21 patients (27 per cent) (Persistent disease, four; recurrence, 17), of whom ten remained disease free after salvage therapy. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate was 74 (95 per cent confidence interval 63 to 83) per cent after ECR alone, and 87 (76 to 93) per cent when survival after salvage therapy for recurrence was included. Conclusion: ECR is a minimally invasive treatment option for early-stage rectal cancer. However, similar to other local therapies, ECR has a worse oncological outcome than radical surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 436
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESULTS OF RADIATION-THERAPY IN EARLY GLOTTIC CARCINOMA (T1, T2 N0)
    STEIN, M
    ROSENBLATT, E
    KUTEN, A
    COHEN, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 40 (03) : 173 - 176
  • [2] ARE THE CURRENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR T1/T2 N0 OESOPHAGEAL CANCER OPTIMAL?
    Evans, J.
    Pande, R.
    Beardsmore, D.
    Corless, D.
    Crisp, W.
    Cheruvu, C.
    [J]. GUT, 2012, 61 : A262 - A262
  • [3] ARE THE CURRENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR T1/T2 N0 OESOPHAGEAL CANCER OPTIMAL?
    Evans, R.
    Evans, J. P.
    Kirby, G.
    Curran, F.
    Cheruvu, C. V. N.
    [J]. GUT, 2015, 64 : A475 - A475
  • [4] Outcomes of chemoradiotherapy plus local excision in patients with clinical T1 or T2, N0 rectal cancer
    Suzuki, T.
    Sadahiro, S.
    Ogimi, T.
    Miyakita, H.
    Saito, G.
    Okada, K.
    Tanaka, A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [5] Photodynamic Therapy Outcome for T1/T2 N0 Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Jerjes, Waseem
    Upile, Tahwinder
    Hamdoon, Zaid
    Mosse, Charles Alexander
    Morcos, Mira
    Hopper, Colin
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (06) : 463 - 469
  • [6] Is prophylactic neck dissection mandatory in T1/T2 N0 oral cancer patients?
    El-Naaj, I. A.
    Leiser, Y.
    Shveis, M.
    Peled, M.
    [J]. ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, : 114 - 114
  • [7] Rectal cancer at the crossroads: The dilemma of clinically staged T3, N0,M0 disease
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Ryan, David P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) : 350 - 351
  • [8] The Role of Radiation Therapy in Resected T2 N0 Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis
    Martin, Jeremiah T.
    Worni, Mathias
    Zwischenberger, Joseph B.
    Gloor, Beat
    Pietrobon, Ricardo
    D'Amico, Thomas A.
    Berry, Mark F.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 95 (02): : 453 - 458
  • [9] T1 N0 Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Bad Actor
    Livingston, Robert
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (05): : 451 - 453
  • [10] Lobectomy versus limited resection in T1 N0 lung cancer
    Lederle, FA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (04): : 1249 - 1249