Continuities and ruptures in historiographic centers and peripheries since the 1990s

We are examining the writing of history after the hijacking of the discipline at the end of the 20th century. The reports imported from political science on the end of history, of Marxism and of the historical discipline itself, have shaken historical paradigms. We are analyzing the continuities and the ruptures in the Annales and in historical materialism these changes. There has been a new way of making history that had not had much travel until the 90s, postmodernism. Once analyzed and systematized the three major historiographical paradigms of the twentieth century and early twenty-first, and certified the idea of "Clio's return" we find novelties and inheritances in different geographies. Latin America, Europe and Africa, will be some of the places we have chosen to test the new situation of history. You can observe methodologies and efforts that suggest that the "return" of history is a fact. The discipline again walks with vigor, with sense and maintaining some of its classic principles, such as rigor, rationality and commitment. All these elements clearly express that the historiographical renovation passes through peripheral spaces both within historiographical centers and outside of them.