Detection of cutaneous protothecosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization

被引:0
|
作者
Kang, Yuli [1 ]
Zeng, Yibin [2 ]
Zhang, Qiangqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Dermatol, 12 Wulumuqi Middle Rd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fluorescence in situ hybridization; oligonucleotide probe; prototheca; skin; paraffin section; IDENTIFICATION; DIFFERENTIATION; ASPERGILLUS; WICKERHAMII; FUSARIUM; DNA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the value of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a tool for the detection of cutaneous protothecosis. Methods: A mouse model of cutaneous protothecosis was established by subcutaneous injection of Prototheca zopfii. Control mice were injected with Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans or PBS. Skin samples were harvested 7 days after injection and embedded in paraffin for staining and labeling, or put into culture for detection of microorganisms. Skin sections were stained with Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and hematoxylineosin (HE). A Prototheca- specific DNA probe was developed and tested on the cultures of Prototheca zopfii, Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, then used for FISH on skin sections from Prototheca- infected and control mice. Results: All of the 11 mice injected with Prototheca developed cutaneous lesions that were positive for Prototheca upon culturing. The Prototheca FISH probe reacted strongly with cultured Prototheca, but failed to react with cultured Candida albicansor Cryptococcus neoformans. Skin sections from Prototheca- infected mice gave a positive signal with the Prototheca probe, while skin sections from control mice did not. Conclusions: Prototheca in paraffinembedded skin tissue sections can be rapidly and accurately identified by FISH. This new method could be useful in the diagnosis of cutaneous protothecosis in the clinic and in epidemiological studies.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 825
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of leukemic cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Michalova, K
    Zemanova, Z
    Brezinova, J
    [J]. FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY AND FLUORESCENT PROBES, VOL 2, 1998, : 167 - 172
  • [2] Fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of DNA and RNA
    Albertson, DG
    Fishpool, RM
    Birchall, PS
    [J]. METHODS IN CELL BIOLOGY, VOL 48, 1995, 48 : 339 - &
  • [3] Detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Szölgyényi, W
    [J]. WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT, 2000, 87 (03): : 61 - 64
  • [4] Detection and differentiation of chlamydiae by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Poppert, S
    Essig, A
    Marre, R
    Wagner, M
    Horn, M
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (08) : 4081 - 4089
  • [5] Diagnosing human cutaneous leishmaniasis using fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Kaluarachchi, Thilini Jayasena
    Wickremasinghe, Rajitha
    Weerasekera, Manjula
    Yasawardene, Surangi
    McBain, Andrew J.
    Yapa, Bandujith
    De Silva, Hiromel
    Menike, Chandranie
    Jayathilake, Subodha
    Munasinghe, Anuradha
    Wickremasinghe, Renu
    Ranasinghe, Shalindra
    [J]. PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 115 (05) : 307 - 314
  • [6] CUTANEOUS PROTOTHECOSIS
    DOGLIOTTI, M
    MARS, PW
    RABSON, AR
    RIPPEY, JJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1975, 93 (04) : 473 - 474
  • [7] Oncogene amplification detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
    Ooi, A
    [J]. ACTA HISTOCHEMICA ET CYTOCHEMICA, 2001, 34 (06) : 391 - 397
  • [8] Aneuploidy detection in porcine gametes by fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Vozdova, M
    Kubickova, S
    Machatkova, M
    Jokesova, E
    Rubes, J
    [J]. CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1999, 85 (1-2): : 97 - 97
  • [9] Cutaneous protothecosis
    Cho, BK
    Ham, SH
    Lee, JY
    Choi, JH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 41 (05) : 304 - 306
  • [10] CUTANEOUS PROTOTHECOSIS
    MARS, PW
    RABSON, AR
    RIPPEY, JJ
    AJELLO, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1971, 85 : 76 - &