Feature Selection and Classifier Performance in Computer-aided Diagnosis for Breast Ultrasound

被引:0
|
作者
Gomez, W. [1 ]
Rodriguez, A. [1 ]
Pereira, W. C. A. [2 ]
Infantosi, A. F. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] CINVESTAV IPN, Informat Technol Lab, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Biomed Engn Program, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We propose a feature selection method for classifying breast ultrasound (BUS) images based on mutual information technique and statistical tests. The BUS dataset consisted of 641 BUS images (228 carcinomas and 413 benign lesions) and every image was segmented by a technique based on Watershed transform. Thereafter, 22 morphological features were computed from segmented lesions and the resultant feature space was ranked by mutual information approach, where the first feature presents the largest discrimination power between benign and malignant classes. Next, feature subsets were built by adding iteratively the first m ranked attributes until all of the 22 features were considered. The .632+ bootstrap method estimated the discrimination performance of each feature subset in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC), by using the Fisher discriminant analysis (FLDA) as classifier. The results pointed out that the AUC values were 0.952 and 0.953 for the reduced (with seven features) and complete sets (with 22 features), respectively. Hence, dimensionality reduction was reached while maintaining the classification performance.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: Dependence on image selection
    Gruszauskas, Nicholas P.
    Drukker, Karen
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Sennett, Charlene A.
    Pesce, Lorenzo L.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (10) : 1234 - 1245
  • [2] Repeatability and classifier bias in computer-aided diagnosis for breast ultrasound
    Drukker, K.
    Pesce, L. L.
    Giger, M. L.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: COMPUTER - AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2010, 7624
  • [3] Feature selection and classifier performance in computer-aided diagnosis: The effect of finite sample size
    Sahiner, B
    Chan, HP
    Petrick, N
    Wagner, RF
    Hadjiiski, L
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (07) : 1509 - 1522
  • [4] Computer-aided Diagnosis in Breast Ultrasound
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    Hsiao, Yi-Hsuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2008, 16 (01) : 46 - 56
  • [5] Computer-aided diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasound
    Horsch, K
    Giger, ML
    Huo, Z
    Vyborny, CJ
    Venta, LA
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 233 - 236
  • [6] Optimization of a breast mass classifier for computer-aided ultrasound analysis
    Andre, M. P.
    Galperin, M.
    Contro, G.
    Omid, N.
    Olson, L.
    [J]. ACOUSTICAL IMAGING, VOL 28, 2007, 28 : 267 - +
  • [7] Computer-aided diagnosis: Feature selection with limited datasets
    Kupinski, MA
    Giger, ML
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 163 - 163
  • [8] A two-step approach for feature selection and classifier ensemble construction in computer-aided diagnosis
    Lee, Michael C.
    Boroczky, Lilla
    Sungur-Stasik, Kivilcim
    Cann, Aaron D.
    Borczuk, Alain C.
    Kawut, Steven M.
    Powell, Charles A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER-BASED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2008, : 548 - +
  • [9] A Benchmark for Breast Ultrasound Image Computer-Aided Diagnosis
    Zhang, E.
    Li, J.
    Seiler, S.
    Chen, M.
    Lu, W.
    Gu, X.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E104 - E105
  • [10] Computer-aided diagnosis in ultrasound: Classification of breast lesions
    Giger, ML
    Moran, CJ
    Wolverton, DE
    Al-Hallaq, HA
    Huo, Z
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209P : 353 - 353