A cross-national analysis of gender arrangements'' presents author's comparative findings on the gendered employment issue. The aim of the article is to formulate a theoretical base for studies of Russian women situation under contemporary transition burdens. Having reviewed experiences of The Netherlands, Western Germany, and Finland, B. Pfau-Effinger sets fort the notion of gender arrangement and, in conclusion, attempts some insights, stemming from the comparative approach, into outstanding problems of empiric field research with regard to Russian women position in the present employment sphere. Berlin Econ Sch, Berlin, Germany Pfau-Effinger, B (corresponding author), Berlin Econ Sch, Berlin, Germany. Pfau-Effinger, Birgit/AAF-4962-2020 [Anonymous], WORLDS WELFARE CAPIT; Archer M., 1996, CULTURE AGENCY PLACE; ASHWIN S, 1999, STUDIERS MANUFACTURE, P97; Ashwin S., 2000, GENDER STATE SOC SOV, P1; Beck Ulrich., 1986, RISIKOGESELLSCHAFT; Connell R. W., 1987, GENDER POWER; DUNCAN S, 1998, FRAUCNARBEITSMARKT B; *FIN MIN LAB, 1993, FINN LAB REV, V1; GUSTAFSSON S, 1997, GENDER EC EUROPEAN P, P36; HAKIM C, 1993, WORK EMPLOY SOC, V7, P97, DOI 10.1177/095001709371005; HIRDMAN Y, 1990, STATENS OFFENTLIGA U, V44; HONEGGER C, 1981, LISTEN OHMACHT SOZIA; *IPOS, 1992, SER GERM MIN WOM YOU; ISHWARAN K, 1959, FAMILY LIFE NETHERLA, pR5; ISSOUPOVA O, 1999, THESIS U MANCHESTER; JULKUNEN R, 1991, LADY BOW; KNIJN T, 1994, EUR J WOMENS STUD, V1, P183, DOI 10.1177/135050689400100204; KORPPITOMMOLA A, 1991, LADY BOW; Lewis Jane., 1992, J EUR SOC POLICY, V2, P159, DOI [10.1177/095892879200200301, DOI 10.1177/095892879200200301]; LILJA K, 1990, UNEMPLOYMENT LABOUR; NATTI J, 1995, LABOUR REV LABOUR EC, V0002, P00343; NICKEL H, 1995, POLITIK ZEITGESC SEP, P23; ORLOFF AS, 1993, AM SOCIOL REV, V58, P303, DOI 10.2307/2095903; Pfau-Effinger B., 1998, PART TIME PROSPECTS, P177; PfauEffinger B, 1996, KOLNER Z SOZIOL SOZ, V48, P462; PFAUEFFINGER B, 2000, SOCIAL POLITICS; PFAUEFFINGER B, 1998, EUROPEAN J SOCIAL SC, P147; PFAUEFFINGER B, 1999, 29 K DTSCH GES SOZ 1, P203; PFAUEFINGER B, 1999, WORKING EUROPE RESHA; PLANTENGA J, 1994, CHANGING PATTERNS WO; PUTTE B, 1993, SOCIAAL MAANDBLA JUL, P487; Sainsbury Diane, 1994, GENDERING WELFARE ST, P8; SIMONEN L, 1990, ACTA U TAMPERENSIS A, V295; Sommerkorn IN., 1988, WANDEL KONTINUITAT F; VOIPIOJUVIAS A, 1949, FINNISH WOMAN; YEANDLE S, 1999, GLOBAL TRENDS FLEXIB, P95 36 6 7 0 6 MEZHDUNARODNAYA KNIGA MOSCOW 39 DIMITROVA UL., 113095 MOSCOW, RUSSIA 0132-1625 SOTSIOL ISSLED+ Sotsiologicheskie Issled. 2000 11 24 + 13 Sociology Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Sociology 391AD 2024-02-28 WOS:000166331200004
J Pfeiler, W Pfeiler, W System of reeducation and labor camps in the USSR OSTEUROPA German Book Review Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Politikwissensch, Koblenz, Germany University of Koblenz & Landau Pfeiler, W (corresponding author), Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Politikwissensch, Koblenz, Germany. SMIRNOV MB, 1998, SPRAVOCNIK SISTEMA I 1 0 0 0 0 DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT OSTEUROPAKUNDE E. V BERLIN SCHAPERSTR 30, 10719 BERLIN, GERMANY 0030-6428 OSTEUROPA Osteuropa JAN 2000 50 1 106 106 1 Political Science Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Government & Law 276VG 2024-02-28 WOS:000084897600014
J Phelps, ES Phelps, ES Lessons in natural-rate dynamics OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES English Article Columbia Univ, Dept Econ, New York, NY 10027 USA Columbia University Phelps, ES (corresponding author), Columbia Univ, Dept Econ, New York, NY 10027 USA. [Anonymous], 1997, REWARDING WORK; [Anonymous], INT TAX PUBLIC FINAN; BLANCHARD OJ, 1985, J POLIT ECON, V93, P223, DOI 10.1086/261297; BRECHER RA, 1998, UNPUB UNEMPLOYMENT G; FRIEDMAN M, 1968, AM ECON REV, V58, P1; Hoon HT, 1997, EUR ECON REV, V41, P549, DOI 10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00021-4; LAYARD PRG, 1986, ECONOMICA S, V53, P121; Layard R, 1987, PERFORMANCE BRIT EC; LINDBECK A, 1988, INSIDER OUTSIDER THE; Phelps E., 1994, STRUCTURAL SLUMPS MO; Phelps E.S., 1970, MICROECONOMIC FDN EM; PHELPS ES, 1968, J POLIT ECON, V76, P678, DOI 10.1086/259438; Phelps ES, 1998, ECON J, V108, P782, DOI 10.1111/1468-0297.00315; Phelps ES, 1997, AM ECON REV, V87, P283; PHELPS ES, 1972, J ECON THEORY, V51, P69; PHELPS ES, 1996, 2196 BIRKB COLL; Pissarides C., 1990, EQUILIBRIUM UNEMPLOY; SALOP SC, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P117 18 3 3 0 5 OXFORD UNIV PRESS OXFORD GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND 0030-7653 OXFORD ECON PAP Oxf. Econ. Pap.-New Ser. JAN 2000 52 1 51 71 10.1093/oep/52.1.51 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oep/52.1.51 21 Economics Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Business & Economics 287PZ 2024-02-28 WOS:000085515900004
J Philipsen, G Philipsen, G Permission to speak the discourse of difference: A case study RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION English Article A case study is presented in which a public speaker drew attention to social differences among the parties present in a speech event. Subsequent public discourse was directed to the propriety of the speaker's conduct. I show how differing rules for public discourse were expressed by those who challenged the propriety of the speaker's conduct and by the speaker himself in defense of his conduct. The juxtaposition of the speaker's accounting and the challengers' critique exposes distinctive rules for the conduct of public discourse with regard to how social differences may be talked about in contemporary public discourse. Univ Washington, Dept Speech Commun, Seattle, WA 98195 USA University of Washington; University of Washington Seattle Philipsen, G (corresponding author), Univ Washington, Dept Speech Commun, Box 353415, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. [Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES 0310; Basso K.H., 1979, PORTRAITS WHITE MAN; Benoit W.L., 1995, ACCOUNTS EXCUSES APO; Cameron D., 2012, VERBAL HYGIENE; CAMERON M, 1990, SEATTLE TIMES 0520, pA24; Chaucer G, 1978, CANTERBURY TALES; Dershowitz Alan, 1992, CONTRARY POPULAR OPI; EVANS D, 1990, COMMUNICATION JUN; Goffman E., 1967, INTERACTION RITUAL; HADLEY J, 1990, SEATTLE POST IN 0516, pB1; HALL BJ, 1991, COMMUN MONOGR, V58, P79, DOI 10.1080/03637759109376215; Hymes D., 1972, Sociolinguistics; Matsuda M. J., 2018, Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment; OLGUIN R, 1990, DAILY 0524, P16; OLGUIN R, 1990, DAILY 0524, P12; PARK A, 1990, DAILY 0515, P3; PARK A, 1990, DAILY 0515, P1; PARK A, 1990, DAILY 0515, P15; PARK M, 1990, DAILY 0516, P10; Parks MM, 1990, DAILY 0516, P1; PHILIPSEN G, 1986, Q J SPEECH, V72, P247, DOI 10.1080/00335638609383772; Philipsen G., 1997, Developing Communication Theories; RAVITCH D, 1995, AM SCHOLAR, V64, P497; ROBERTSON C, 1990, DAILY 0516, P4; TURNER V, 1980, CRIT INQUIRY, V7, P141, DOI 10.1086/448092; 1997, MORNING EDITION 0607; 1995, NY TIMES 0823, pC21 27 12 20 0 2 LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC MAHWAH 10 INDUSTRIAL AVE, MAHWAH, NJ 07430-2262 USA 0835-1813 RES LANG SOC INTERAC Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 2000 33 2 213 234 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3302_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3302_4 22 Communication; Linguistics; Psychology, Social Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Communication; Linguistics; Psychology 316BE 2024-02-28 WOS:000087146800004
J Phillips, JN Phillips, JN Employment law:: Disparate treatment employment discrimination -: Post-Hicks analysis of disparate treatment discrimination under the McDonnell Douglas framework and its recent application in the Tenth Circuit DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW English Article Bisom-Rapp Susan, 1999, Florida State University Law Rev, V26, P959; BISOMRAPP S, 1999, FLA ST U L REV, V26, P988; Green TK, 1999, CALIF LAW REV, V87, P983, DOI 10.2307/3481022; GREEN TK, 1999, CALIF LAW REV, V87, P984; HARTMAN GS, 1994, EMPLOYMENT LAW RELAT, P358; Lamarche Gabrielle R., 1998, SUFFOLK U L REV, V32, P107; LAMARCHE GR, 1998, SUFFOLK U L REV, V32, P117; PLASS S, 1998, SETON HALL L REV, V29, P599; WILLIAMS KW, 1997, BERKELEY J EMP LAB L, V18, P98 9 0 0 0 1 UNIV DENVER, COLLEGE OF LAW DENVER 7039 EAST 18TH AVE, SUITE 235, DENVER, CO 80220 USA 0883-9409 DENVER U LAW REV Denver Univ. Law Rev. 2000 77 3 483 505 23 Law Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) Government & Law 484FU 2024-02-28 WOS:000171680200004
J Phillips, RA; Reichart, J Phillips, RA; Reichart, J The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based approach JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS English Article Stakeholder theory is often unable to distinguish those individuals and groups that are stakeholders from those that are not. This problem of stakeholder identity has recently been addressed by linking stakeholder theory to a Rawlsian principle of fairness. To illustrate, the question of stakeholder status for the non-human environment is discussed. This essay criticizes a past attempt to ascribe stakeholder status to the non-human environment, which utilized a broad definition of the term stakeholder." This paper then demonstrates how, despite the denial of stakeholder status, the environment is nonetheless accounted for on a fairness-based approach through legitimate organizational stakeholders. In addition, since stakeholder theory has never claimed to be a comprehensive ethical scheme, it is argued that sound reasons might exist for managers to consider their organization's impact on the environment that are not stakeholder-related.
