Liquefaction Evaluation Based on Shear Wave Velocity Using Random Forest

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Shushan [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Xiaofei [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Hongmei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhihua [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Zhifu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Urban Underground Space Res Ctr, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Inst Geotech Engn, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
关键词
CONE PENETRATION TEST; RESISTANCE; SOILS;
D O I
10.1155/2021/3230343
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Liquefaction evaluation on the sands induced by earthquake is of significance for engineers in seismic design. In this study, the random forest (RF) method is introduced and adopted to evaluate the seismic liquefaction potential of soils based on the shear wave velocity. The RF model was developed using the Andrus database as a training dataset comprising 225 sets of liquefaction performance and shear wave velocity measurements. Five training parameters are selected for RF model including seismic magnitude (M-w), peak horizontal ground surface acceleration (a(max)), stress-corrected shear wave velocity of soil (V-s1), sandy-layer buried depth (d(s)), and a new introduced parameter, stress ratio (k). In addition, the optimal hyperparameters for the random forest model are determined based on the minimum error rate for the out-of-bag dataset (ERROOB) such as the number of classification trees, maximum depth of trees, and maximum number of features. The established random forest model was validated using the Kayen database as testing dataset and compared with the Chinese code and the Andrus methods. The results indicated that the random forest method established based on the training dataset was credible. The random forest method gave a success rate for liquefied sites and even a total success rate for all cases higher than 80%, which is completely acceptable. By contrast, the Chinese code method and the Andrus methods gave a high success rate for liquefaction but very low for nonliquefaction which led to the increase of engineering cost. The developed RF model can provide references for engineers to evaluate liquefaction potential.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Random Forest Method and Shear Wave Velocity Results
    Nejad, Amin Shoari
    Guler, Erol
    Ozturan, Meltem
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS & COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE (ICAMCS.NET 2018), 2018, : 23 - 26
  • [2] Soil liquefaction evaluation using shear wave velocity
    Kayabali, K
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 1996, 44 (1-4) : 121 - 127
  • [3] Liquefaction Analysis using Shear Wave Velocity
    Kamel, Filali
    Badreddine, Sbartai
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2020, 6 (10): : 1944 - 1955
  • [4] Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil using the shear wave velocity in Tehran, Iran
    Sahar Rahmanian
    Fereydoun Rezaie
    [J]. Geosciences Journal, 2017, 21 : 81 - 92
  • [5] Evaluation of liquefaction potential of soil using the shear wave velocity in Tehran, Iran
    Rahmanian, Sahar
    Rezaie, Fereydoun
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [6] Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest
    V. R. Kohestani
    M. Hassanlourad
    A. Ardakani
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 79 : 1079 - 1089
  • [7] Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest
    Kohestani, V. R.
    Hassanlourad, M.
    Ardakani, A.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (02) : 1079 - 1089
  • [8] Evaluation of Shear Wave Velocity Based Soil Liquefaction Resistance Criteria by Centrifuge Tests
    Fu, Lei
    Liu, Gang
    Zeng, Xiangwu
    [J]. GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2009, 32 (01): : 39 - 44
  • [9] Soil Liquefaction evaluation of offshore site based on in situ shear wave velocity measurements
    Di Shengjie
    Wang Mingyuan
    Shan Zhigang
    Jia Haibo
    [J]. PROGRESS IN INDUSTRIAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2013, 405-408 : 470 - 473
  • [10] Model uncertainty of shear wave velocity-based method for liquefaction potential evaluation
    Juang, CH
    Yang, SH
    Yuan, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (10) : 1274 - 1282