Trapping small mammals in the forest understory: a comparison of three methods

被引:14
|
作者
Graipel, ME
Cherem, JJ
Miller, PRM
Glock, L
机构
[1] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, CCB, Dept Ecol & Zool, BR-88040970 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, CCA, Dept Engn Rural, BR-88040970 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
rodents; marsupials; Atlantic rainforest; capture techniques;
D O I
10.1515/mamm-2003-0409
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
During a 19-month Study in an area of the Atlantic Coast rainforest in southern Brazil, two simple and effective alternative methods for trapping small mammals (< 1,000 g) in the forest understory were compared to the standard " V " frame method. The " support pole method " and " L-bracket method " did not differ in capture rate from the " V " frame method. The L-bracket method did prove to be easier to set up, requiring the same baiting time as the " V " frame method. Most important, the L-bracket method allowed greater uniformity of site selection of the traps distributed on a grid.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 558
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ABUNDANCE ESTIMATES OF SMALL MAMMALS IN AUSTRALIAN TROPICAL RAIN-FOREST - A COMPARISON OF 4 TRAPPING METHODS
    LAURANCE, WF
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 1992, 19 (06) : 651 - 655
  • [2] A technique for trapping small mammals in the forest canopy
    Vieira, EM
    MAMMALIA, 1998, 62 (02) : 306 - 310
  • [3] Comparison of two sampling methods of small mammals in the margin of a lowland forest
    Stanko, M
    Mosansky, L
    Fricová, J
    Casanova, JC
    BIOLOGIA, 1999, 54 (05) : 595 - 597
  • [4] Understory use by terrestrial small mammals in an unflooded forest patch in the Pantanal floodplain
    Sano, Nayara Yoshie
    Herrera, Heitor Miraglia
    de Oliveira Porfirio, Grasiela Edith
    Santos, Filipe Martins
    MAMMALIA, 2021, 85 (02) : 164 - 167
  • [5] A comparison of three trapping methods used to survey forest-dwelling Coleoptera
    Hyvärinen, E
    Kouki, J
    Martikainen, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 2006, 103 (02) : 397 - 407
  • [6] Comparison of Minimally Invasive Monitoring Methods and Live Trapping in Mammals
    Paez, Andrea Miranda
    Sundaram, Mekala
    Willoughby, Janna R.
    GENES, 2021, 12 (12)
  • [7] A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles
    Okland, B
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1996, 93 (02) : 195 - 209
  • [8] DENSITY ESTIMATION OF SMALL MAMMALS - COMPARISON OF TECHNIQUES UTILIZING REMOVAL TRAPPING
    KAUFMAN, DW
    GENTRY, JB
    KAUFMAN, GA
    SMITH, MH
    WIENER, JG
    ACTA THERIOLOGICA, 1978, 23 (7-18): : 147 - 171
  • [9] Determinants of capture-recapture success: an evaluation of trapping methods to estimate population and community parameters for Atlantic forest small mammals
    Barros, Camila S.
    Puettker, Thomas
    Pinotti, Bruno T.
    Pardini, Renata
    ZOOLOGIA, 2015, 32 (05): : 334 - 344
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF CERTAIN METHODS OF MEASURING RANGES OF SMALL MAMMALS
    STICKEL, LF
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1954, 35 (01) : 1 - 15