Optimizing the treatment of ovarian cancer: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking versus primary debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancers likely to have suboptimal resection

被引:30
|
作者
Gill, Sarah E. [1 ]
McGree, Michaela E. [2 ]
Weaver, Amy L. [2 ]
Cliby, William A. [1 ]
Langstraat, Carrie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Gynecol Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biomed Stat & Informat, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Interval debulking surgery; Ovarian cancer; Unresectable; PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; ADVANCED-STAGE OVARIAN; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA; DISEASE; TRIAL; PROGNOSIS; COMPLICATIONS; PACLITAXEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To: a) identify prognostic factors in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulldng surgery (IDS), and b) compare post-surgical survival between patients treated with NACT/IDS for presumed unresectable disease and stage IIIC/IV patients who underwent suboptimal primary debulking surgery (PDS). Methods. This was a retrospective study of consecutive stage IIIC or IV patients undergoing IDS after NACT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2013. A subset of patients receiving NACT/IDS for the indication of unresectable disease were matched 1:1 on age and stage to a cohort of patients who underwent suboptimal PDS between 2003 and 2011. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models. Results. We identified 87 patients treated with NACT/IDS: the median OS and PFS following surgery was 2.4 and 1.0 years, respectively. Factors associated with significantly worse OS were older age (adjusted HR 1.60 per 10-year increase in age, 95% CI 1.18, 2.16) and elevated CA-125 before IDS (adjusted HR 2.30 for CA-125 >35 U/mL, 95% CI 1.25, 423). Number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles administered did not have a significant effect on survival. In the matched cohort analysis of presumed unresectable cases undergoing NACT/IDS vs suboptimal PDS cases (n = 45 each), the NACT/IDS group had a significant OS advantage (HR 0.53; 95% CI 032, 0.88), and fewer patients experienced a 30-day postoperative Accordion grade 3/4 complication (11% vs 36%, P = 0.01). Conclusions. Younger age and normalization of CA-125 prior to IDS are associated with improved survival with NAG:LADS. For primary EOC where resection to residual disease of 1 cm or less is unlikely, NACT/IDS is associated with improved survival and reduced perioperative morbidity compared to PDS. As these patients are likely best served by NACT/IDS, more reliable predictors of resectability would be valuable. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 273
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY OR NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER?
    Mansouri, H.
    Zemni, I.
    Ben Safta, I.
    Achouri, L.
    Ben Hassouna, J.
    Hechiche, M.
    Chargui, R.
    Rahal, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A120 - A120
  • [2] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery versus primary debulking surgery in the advanced epithelial ovarian cancer - a retrospective cohort study
    Maricic, Slobodan
    Mandic, Aljosa
    Dejanovic, Ninoslav
    Kladar, Nebojsa
    Popovic, Marina
    Ivkovic-Kapicl, Tatjana
    Gutic, Bojana
    Kokanov, Dunja
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2021, 78 (11) : 1193 - 1199
  • [3] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with interval debulking surgery versus chemotherapy alone for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Khouri, Olivia
    Fazzari, Melissa
    Katcher, Arielle
    Nevadunsky, Nicole
    Fife, Alexander
    Isani, Sara
    Smotkin, David
    Kuo, Dennis Yi-Shin
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S209 - S210
  • [4] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Hong Zheng
    Yu-Nong Gao
    Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [5] Primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Zheng, Hong
    Gao, Yu-Nong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 24 (04) : 304 - 309
  • [6] Primary debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer
    Xu, Z.
    Justiniano, C. F.
    Fleming, F. J.
    Boscoe, F. P.
    Schymura, M. J.
    Rubinsak, L. A.
    Morrow, G.
    Minasian, L.
    Temkin, S. M.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 149 : 78 - 78
  • [7] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Vergote, IB
    De Wever, I
    Decloedt, J
    Tjalma, W
    Van Gramberen, M
    van Dam, P
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2000, 27 (03) : 31 - 36
  • [8] Debulking Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Interval or at the End of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    F. Cantu-de Leon, D.
    Gallardo-Alvarado, L.
    Salcedo-Hernandez, R.
    Ramirez, R.
    Perez-Montiel, D.
    Onate-Ocana, L.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 1) : S86 - S86
  • [9] PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY (PDS) VERSUS NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOLLOWED BY INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY (IDS) FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER
    Obeidat, R.
    Saidi, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (08)
  • [10] Primary Cytoreductive Surgery Versus Interval Debulking Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: An Institutional Review
    Zeeshanuddin Ahmad
    Amar Jain
    Nikhil Mehta
    Elroy Saldanha
    Dhruv Patel
    Sanjay M. Desai
    Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 2019, 17