Anonymity Versus Privacy: Selective Information Sharing in Online Cancer Communities

被引:55
|
作者
Frost, Jeana [1 ]
Vermeulen, Ivar E. [1 ]
Beekers, Nienke [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Natl IT Inst Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
online systems; cancer; privacy; confidentiality; Health; 2.0; anonymity; SUPPORTIVE CARE NEEDS; HEALTH; SURVIVORS; MODEL; PROGRAMS; NETWORK; PEOPLE; WOMEN; TRUST;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.2684
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Active sharing in online cancer communities benefits patients. However, many patients refrain from sharing health information online due to privacy concerns. Existing research on privacy emphasizes data security and confidentiality, largely focusing on electronic medical records. Patient preferences around information sharing in online communities remain poorly understood. Consistent with the privacy calculus perspective adopted from e-commerce research, we suggest that patients approach online information sharing instrumentally, weighing privacy costs against participation benefits when deciding whether to share certain information. Consequently, we argue that patients prefer sharing clinical information over daily life and identity information that potentially compromises anonymity. Furthermore, we explore whether patients' prior experiences, age, health, and gender affect perceived privacy costs and thus willingness to share information. Objective: The goal of the present study is to document patient preferences for sharing information within online health platforms. Methods: A total of 115 cancer patients reported sharing intentions for 15 different types of information, demographics, health status, prior privacy experiences, expected community utility, and privacy concerns. Results: Factor analysis on the 15 information types revealed 3 factors coinciding with 3 proposed information categories: clinical, daily life, and identity information. A within-subject ANOVA showed a strong preference for sharing clinical information compared to daily life and identity information (F-1,F-114= 135.59, P=. 001, eta(2)=. 93). Also, adverse online privacy experiences, age, and health status negatively affected information-sharing intentions. Female patients shared information less willingly. Conclusions: Respondents'information-sharing intentions depend on dispositional and situational factors. Patients share medical details more willingly than daily life or identity information. The results suggest the need to focus on anonymity rather than privacy in online communities.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 259
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Anonymity on Information Sharing through Internal Psychological Processes: A Case of South Korean Online Communities
    Lee, Ho
    Choi, Jaewon
    Kim, Kyung Kyu
    Lee, Ae Ri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2014, 22 (03) : 57 - 77
  • [2] Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the facebook
    Acquisti, Alessandro
    Gross, Ralph
    [J]. PRIVACY ENHANCING TECHNOLOGIES, 2006, 4258 : 36 - +
  • [3] Managing information sharing in online communities and marketplaces
    Boon, Edward
    Pitt, Leyland
    Salehi-Sangari, Esmail
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2015, 58 (03) : 347 - 353
  • [4] The Impact of Anonymity in Online Communities
    Omernick, Eli
    Sood, Sara Owsley
    [J]. 2013 ASE/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL COMPUTING (SOCIALCOM), 2013, : 526 - 535
  • [5] Sharing Personal Health Information: Personalization versus Privacy
    Jena, Rishikesh
    [J]. AMCIS 2015 PROCEEDINGS, 2015,
  • [6] Does the Type of Anonymity Matter? The Impact of Visualization on Information Sharing in Online Groups
    Wodzicki, Katrin
    Schwaemmlein, Eva
    Cress, Ulrike
    Kimmerle, Joachim
    [J]. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2011, 14 (03) : 157 - 160
  • [7] Privacy Preserving and Information Sharing in Decentralized Online Social Network
    Ghodpage, Nikita V.
    Mante, R. V.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICICCT), 2018, : 152 - 155
  • [8] Diversity versus Anonymity for Privacy Preservation
    Mirakabad, Mohammad Reza Zare
    Jantan, Aman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2008, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS: COGNITIVE INFORMATICS: BRIDGING NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL KNOWLEDGE, 2008, : 1935 - 1941
  • [9] Data retention: Privacy, anonymity, and accountability online
    Crump, C
    [J]. STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 2003, 56 (01) : 191 - 229
  • [10] Ensuring Online Data Privacy and Controlling Anonymity
    Axelrod, C. Warren
    [J]. 2015 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & EXPO ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR A SMARTER WORLD (CEWIT), 2015,