A mapping study of employee innovation: proposing a research agenda

被引:45
|
作者
Backstrom, Izabelle [1 ]
Bengtsson, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Design Sci, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Innovation management; Innovation process; Employee innovation; Employee innovative behaviour; Innovation performance; Dynamic capability; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT; SERVICE INNOVATION; JOB-SATISFACTION; WORK BEHAVIOR; CREATIVITY; MODEL; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/EJIM-05-2018-0101
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to systematically explore the current understanding of the role of non-R&D and non-managerial employees in different phases and types of innovation, and to propose avenues for future research. Design/methodology/approach By conducting a mapping study and applying a critical discourse analysis, the phenomenon of ordinary employee innovation is explored across various fields, such as human resource management, psychology, economics, strategy, marketing and technology management. Proposals for future research are suggested based on the theoretical framework of dynamic capability, with the aim of further integrating employee innovation in the innovation management domain. Findings The findings illuminate five main themes that form the employee innovation discourse across various academic disciplines, namely, employee innovative work behavior, firm innovation performance, employee innovation processes, frontline service employees and management tools for employee innovation. Originality/value Unlike prior studies in the field of innovation management, this study specifically focuses on the employees without innovation-specific functions in organizations, or ordinary employees. Concerning the methodological lens of critical discourse analysis, the authors suggest forming the employee innovation discourse in an inclusive manner. Based on the theoretical lens of dynamic capability, a research agenda is proposed in which employee innovation research makes additional use of innovation processes and types, and takes into account the interactive processes and strong empirical evidence for relevant management tools.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 492
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using big data for co-innovation processes: Mapping the field of data-driven innovation, proposing theoretical developments and providing a research agenda
    Bresciani, Stefano
    Ciampi, Francesco
    Meli, Francesco
    Ferraris, Alberto
    [J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2021, 60
  • [2] Using big data for co-innovation processes: Mapping the field of data-driven innovation, proposing theoretical developments and providing a research agenda
    Bresciani, Stefano
    Ciampi, Francesco
    Meli, Francesco
    Ferraris, Alberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 60
  • [3] Employee-driven digital innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda
    Opland, Leif Erik
    Pappas, Ilias O.
    Engesmo, Jostein
    Jaccheri, Letizia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 143 : 255 - 271
  • [4] “Displaced archives”: proposing a research agenda
    James Lowry
    [J]. Archival Science, 2019, 19 : 349 - 358
  • [5] "Displaced archives": proposing a research agenda
    Lowry, James
    [J]. ARCHIVAL SCIENCE, 2019, 19 (04) : 349 - 358
  • [7] Location Choice Research: Proposing New Agenda
    Jain, Naveen Kumar
    Kothari, Tanvi
    Kumar, Vikas
    [J]. MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2016, 56 (03) : 303 - 324
  • [8] Location Choice Research: Proposing New Agenda
    Naveen Kumar Jain
    Tanvi Kothari
    Vikas Kumar
    [J]. Management International Review, 2016, 56 : 303 - 324
  • [9] Mapping Service Innovation Research in Hospitality and Tourism: An Integrative Bibliometric Analysis and Research Agenda
    So, Kevin Kam Fung
    Kim, Hyunsu
    He, Yueying
    Li, Xiang
    [J]. CORNELL HOSPITALITY QUARTERLY, 2023, 64 (02) : 143 - 160
  • [10] Knowledge and the Ageing Employee: A Research Agenda
    Stam, Christiaan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN CON FERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2009, : 435 - 441