Slovenia: neo-corporatism under the neo-liberal turn

被引:6
|
作者
Stanojevic, Miroslav [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Social Sci, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
Industrial relations; Trade unions; Eastern Europe; Structural reforms; Real socialism; Neo-corporatism; Global economic crisis; Eurozone; CAPITALISM;
D O I
10.1108/ER-01-2017-0008
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reveal the formation and development of Slovenia's neo-corporatist industrial relations system in the 1990s, and its change which overlaps with Slovenia's accession to the EU and the eurozone. Design/methodology/approach The approach is based on the presumption that the transitional processes engaged in by the societies of real socialism were merely part of a larger and deeper transition - the great recommodification of the post-war decommodified societies of European democratic capitalism. Findings Already by the mid-1990s, the Slovenian industrial relations system contained all key features of the neo-corporatist regimes emerging after the Second World War in the European systems of democratic capitalism. Like those systems, in the 1990s Slovenia also saw a system being formed of political exchanges based on wage restraint policy. The combination of this wage policy and appropriate national monetary policy facilitated the Slovenian economy's competitiveness and above-average growth. Slovenia was a success story. Originality/value The Slovenian system started to change in the middle of the last decade. The trigger of this change was Slovenia's entry to the eurozone. Since then, Slovenian neo-corporatism has been subject to systematic deregulation. Despite this, the analysis suggests the Slovenian industrial relations system still contains a coordinating mechanism that distinguishes it from other post-communist, and, generally speaking, liberal market economies.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 724
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Between neo-liberalism and neo-corporatism: Estonia and Slovenia in the comparative perspective
    Adam, Frane
    Kristan, Primoz
    Tomsic, Matevz
    [J]. REVIJA ZA SOCIJALNU POLITIKU, 2008, 15 (02): : 135 - 150
  • [2] THE MIRAGE OF NEO-CORPORATISM
    STREIT, ME
    [J]. KYKLOS, 1988, 41 (04) : 603 - 624
  • [3] Neo-corporatism and environmental policy
    Downes, D
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 31 (02) : 175 - 190
  • [4] NEO-CORPORATISM IN MODERN RUSSIA
    Makarenko, B. I.
    [J]. SRAVNITELNAYA POLITIKA-COMPARATIVE POLITICS, 2011, 2 (02): : 90 - 96
  • [5] THE NEO-LIBERAL REVOLUTION
    Hall, Stuart
    [J]. CULTURAL STUDIES, 2011, 25 (06) : 705 - 728
  • [6] The neo-liberal state
    John Meadowcroft
    [J]. Acta Politica, 2011, 46 : 212 - 214
  • [7] NEO-LIBERAL SMALL STATES AND ECONOMIC CRISIS: LESSONS FOR DEMOCRATIC CORPORATISM
    Thorhallsson, Baldur
    Kattel, Rainer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BALTIC STUDIES, 2013, 44 (01) : 83 - 103
  • [8] The neo-liberal state
    Meadowcroft, John
    [J]. ACTA POLITICA, 2011, 46 (02) : 212 - 214
  • [9] The neo-liberal villa
    Zerah, Marie-Helene
    [J]. REVUE FRANCAISE DE SOCIOLOGIE, 2022, 63 (01): : 176 - 178
  • [10] The Neo-Liberal Statef
    Kennedy, Geoff
    [J]. NEW POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 33 (03) : 391 - 394