Economic analysis of two nuclear fuel cycle options

被引:12
|
作者
Zhou, Chaoran [1 ]
Liu, Xuegang [2 ]
Gu, Zhongmao [3 ]
Wang, Yugang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Phys, State Key Lab Nucl Phys & Technol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Nucl & New Energy Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] China Inst Atom Energy, Beijing 102413, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Nuclear fuel cycle option; LFCC; Material flows; Economics analysis; Breakeven price; Sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2014.04.005
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
There are two major nuclear fuel cycle options in the world: the once-through cycle (OTC) option and the closed fuel cycle (CFC) option which consists of the thermal reactor recycle (TRR) and the fast reactor recycle (FRR). Presently, the TRR option has been industrially implemented in some European countries while the FRR option is still under development internationally. In this paper, the economic analysis of OTC and TRR options was carried out using levelized fuel cycle cost (LFCC). The two options were analyzed by calculating the equilibrium material flows as well as the economic costs of the overall fuel cycle components. The LFCCs of the two options were obtained as follows: OTC $5.94 +/- 0.67 mills/kW h and TRR $6.13 +/- 0.55 mills/kW h. Taking all uncertainties into considerations, the two options' costs were in the same range. In addition, the sensitivity analysis was made to figure out the breakeven uranium price ($112/kgHM), at which uranium price from OTC was economically competitive to TRR option slightly. Under the most possible international circumstance, it indicates a decreasing breakeven uranium price in future, which means TRR option would be more economical than OTC option. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 236
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic Analysis of Different Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options
    Ko, Won Il
    Gao, Fanxing
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS, 2012, 2012
  • [2] ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE
    GIRVIN, LM
    WITZIG, WF
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 1972, 13 (01) : 53 - &
  • [3] Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options
    Passerini, Stefano
    Kazimi, Mujid
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (10): : 2377 - 2398
  • [4] ON THE OPTIONS OF UKRAINE'S NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE
    Krasnorutskyy, V. S.
    Kirsanova, O. S.
    PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, (02): : 74 - 81
  • [5] Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation and Real Options
    Havlicek, L.
    ACTA POLYTECHNICA, 2008, 48 (03) : 30 - 34
  • [6] Criteria for proliferation resistance of nuclear fuel cycle options
    Kiriyama, E
    Pickett, S
    Suzuki, T
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 501 - 507
  • [7] VERSATILE MODEL FOR ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR-FUEL CYCLE
    WHITE, W
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1978, 28 (JUN): : 380 - 381
  • [8] Preliminary sustainable and economic analysis of nuclear fuel cycle with subcritical system
    Wang, Minghuang
    Fu, Xuewei
    Zhang, Wenliang
    Lian, Chao
    Chen, Dehong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2018, 42 (01) : 207 - 213
  • [9] ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS OF NUCLEAR-FUEL CYCLE
    ZECH, HJ
    PICKERT, FK
    CHEMIKER-ZEITUNG, 1977, 101 (01): : 9 - 21
  • [10] Comparative study of different nuclear fuel cycle options: Quantitative analysis on material flow
    Park, Byung Heung
    Gao, Fanxing
    Kwon, Eun-ha
    Ko, Won Il
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (11) : 6916 - 6924