Comparison of the predictive value of progesterone-related indicators for pregnancy outcomes of women undergoing the short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol: a retrospective study

被引:7
|
作者
Zhang, Yangyang [1 ]
Xu, Yang [1 ]
Wang, Yuqiong [1 ]
Xue, Qing [1 ]
Shang, Jing [1 ]
Yang, Xiuli [1 ]
Shan, Xuemin [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hosp 1, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
关键词
Progesterone; P/E-2; P-to-follicle index; P-to-mature oocyte index; Pregnancy outcome;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-021-00768-2
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many progesterone (P) elevation-related indicators for predicting pregnancy outcomes, including the serum P, P-to-oestradiol ratio (P/E-2), P-to-follicle index (PFI), and P-to-mature oocyte index (PMOI); however, due to inconsistencies in study populations and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols among studies, these indicators are controversial. Moreover, no researchers have included these four commonly used indicators in one study to compare their predictive efficacies. The objective of this study was to compare the predictive value of P-related indicators for pregnancy outcomes of women undergoing the short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol. Methods: A total of 612 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI were recruited for this study. Serum samples were obtained on the morning of HCG injection for serum P and E-2 measurements. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed to determine the follicle count (>= 14 mm in diameter). The number of mature oocytes was observed in the embryo laboratory after oocyte retrieval. Results: In cases of P < 2.5 ng/ml, there was no significant difference in the serum P level or P/E-2 between the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group. The PFI and PMOI of the pregnant group were significantly lower than those of the non-pregnant group. According to the stratified analysis of the ovarian response, only the PMI and PMOI of the pregnant women in the normal ovarian response group were lower than those of the non-pregnant women. To compare the predictive value of the PFI and PMOI in IVF/ICSI outcomes, the patients were divided into four groups. The good-quality embryo rate and clinical pregnancy rate were highest in Group A (low PFI and low PMOI) and lowest in Group D (high PFI and high PMOI). In the two groups with discordant PFI and PMOI, namely Group B (low PFI and high PMOI) and Group C (high PFI and low PMOI), the good-quality embryo rate and clinical pregnancy rate were not significantly different. Conclusions: The PFI and PMOI had equal value in predicting clinical pregnancy outcomes in the normal ovarian response group undergoing the short-acting GnRH agonist long protocol. Each clinical centre can choose one of the indicators according to their actual situation in clinical practice and establish individual cut-off values for PFI and PMOI based on their own hormonal measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Comparison of the predictive value of progesterone‐related indicators for pregnancy outcomes of women undergoing the short‐acting GnRH agonist long protocol: a retrospective study
    Yangyang Zhang
    Yang Xu
    Yuqiong Wang
    Qing Xue
    Jing Shang
    Xiuli Yang
    Xuemin Shan
    [J]. Journal of Ovarian Research, 14
  • [3] Optimizing FSH Concentration Modulation in the Short-Acting GnRH-a Long Protocol for IVF/ICSI: A Retrospective Study
    Lingmin Hu
    Lijing Bai
    Rui Qin
    Xiaoyu Wang
    Jing Zhou
    Chunmei Yu
    Yang Chen
    Shuxian Wang
    Shenyu Zhao
    Li Chen
    Renjie Lu
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2024, 41 : 215 - 230
  • [4] Optimizing FSH Concentration Modulation in the Short-Acting GnRH-a Long Protocol for IVF/ICSI: A Retrospective Study
    Hu, Lingmin
    Bai, Lijing
    Qin, Rui
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Zhou, Jing
    Yu, Chunmei
    Chen, Yang
    Wang, Shuxian
    Zhao, Shenyu
    Chen, Li
    Lu, Renjie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2024, 41 (01) : 215 - 230
  • [5] Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a propensity-score matching analysis
    Zhang, Liting
    Cai, He
    Liu, Xitong
    Xiong, Yao
    Liang, Xiaoling
    Shi, Juanzi
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [6] Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between GnRH antagonist protocol with freeze-all strategy and long-acting GnRH agonist protocol in women with adenomyosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a propensity-score matching analysis
    Liting Zhang
    He Cai
    Xitong Liu
    Yao Xiong
    Xiaoling Liang
    Juanzi Shi
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [7] Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Rui Yang
    Yichun Guan
    Valerie Perrot
    Juan Ma
    Rong Li
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 2027 - 2037
  • [8] Comparison of the Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Follicular Protocol with the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Yang, Rui
    Guan, Yichun
    Perrot, Valerie
    Ma, Juan
    Li, Rong
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (05) : 2027 - 2037
  • [9] Ultra-Long GnRH Agonist Protocol During IVF/ICSI Improves Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Adenomyosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Lan, Jie
    Wu, Yaoqiu
    Wu, Zexuan
    Wu, Yingchen
    Yang, Rong
    Liu, Ying
    Lin, Haiyan
    Jiao, Xuedan
    Zhang, Qingxue
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [10] An Individualized Recommendation for Controlled Ovary Stimulation Protocol in Women Who Received the GnRH Agonist Long-Acting Protocol or the GnRH Antagonist Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Chen, Ming-Xing
    Meng, Xiang-Qian
    Zhong, Zhao-Hui
    Tang, Xiao-Jun
    Li, Tian
    Feng, Qian
    Adu-Gyamfi, Enoch Appiah
    Jia, Yan
    Lv, Xing-Yu
    Geng, Li-Hong
    Zhu, Lin
    He, Wei
    Wan, Qi
    Ding, Yu-Bin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13