Sensitivity study of rock-physics parameters for modeling time-lapse seismic response of Norne field

被引:11
|
作者
Suman, Amit [1 ]
Mukerji, Tapan [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1190/GEO2013-0045.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Time-lapse seismic modeling is an important step in joint inversion of time-lapse seismic and production data of a field. Rock-physics analysis is the basis for modeling the time-lapse seismic data. However, joint inversion of both types of data for estimation of reservoir parameters is highly nonlinear and complex with uncertainties at each step of the process. So it is essential, before proceeding with large-scale history matching, to investigate sensitive rock-physics parameters in modeling the time-lapse seismic response of a field. We used the data set of the Norne field to investigate sensitive parameters in time-lapse seismic modeling. We first investigated sensitive parameters in the Gassmann's equation. The investigated parameters include mineral properties, water salinity, pore pressure, and gas-oil ratio. Next, we investigated parameter sensitivity for time-lapse seismic modeling of the Norne field. The investigated rock-physics parameters are clay content, cement fraction, average number of contact grains per sand, pore pressure, and fluid mixing. We observed that the average number of contact grains per sand had the most impact on time-lapse seismic modeling of the Norne field. The clay content was the most sensitive parameter in fluid substitution for calculating seismic velocities of the Norne field. Salinity and pore pressure had minimal impact on fluid substitution for this case. This sensitivity analysis helps to select important parameters for time-lapse (4D) seismic history matching, which is an important aspect of joint inversion of production and time-lapse seismic modeling of a field.
引用
收藏
页码:D511 / D523
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sandstone reservoir rock physics modeling and time-lapse seismic analysis
    Zhang, Jiajia
    Yin, Xingyao
    Gu, Yipeng
    Zhou, Yuqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2024, 222
  • [2] Quantitative interpretation of time-lapse seismic data at Farnsworth field unit: Rock physics modeling, and calibration of simulated time-lapse velocity responses
    Acheampong, Samuel Appiah
    Ampomah, William
    Khaniani, Hassan
    Will, Robert
    Sarkodie-Kyeremeh, Justice
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 12 (06): : 671 - 697
  • [3] Rock physics analysis for time-lapse seismic at Schiehallion Field, North Sea
    Meadows, M
    Adams, D
    Wright, R
    Tura, A
    Cole, S
    Lumley, D
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2005, 53 (02) : 205 - 213
  • [4] Determination of a stress-dependent rock-physics model using anisotropic time-lapse tomographic inversion
    Mastio, Nicolas
    Thore, Pierre
    Conin, Marianne
    Caumon, Guillaume
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (04) : C141 - C152
  • [5] A Review on Methods for Constructing Rock Physics Model of Saturated Reservoir Rock for Time-Lapse Seismic
    Nguyen, Phung K. T.
    Nam, Myung Jin
    [J]. GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING, 2011, 14 (02) : 95 - 107
  • [6] Time-lapse seismic analysis of Fulmar Field
    Exxon Production Research Company, Houston
    TX, United States
    不详
    [J]. Leading Edge, 10 (1420-1428):
  • [7] Rock physics modelling and inversion for saturation-pressure changes in time-lapse seismic studies
    Lang, Xiaozheng
    Grana, Dario
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2019, 67 (07) : 1912 - 1928
  • [8] Sensitivity of time-lapse seismic to reservoir stress path
    Sayers, CM
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2006, 54 (03) : 369 - 380
  • [9] Modeling a gas condensate reservoir with time-lapse seismic
    Denney, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 55 (02): : 60 - 61
  • [10] Modeling a gas condensate reservoir with time-lapse seismic
    Waggoner, J.R.
    Cominelli, A.
    Seymour, R.H.
    [J]. JPT, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2003, 55 (02): : 60 - 61