Criteria for Identifying Middle-Range Theories in Criminology

被引:0
|
作者
Prozumentov, Lev M. [1 ]
Shesler, Aleksandr, V [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tomsk State Univ, Tomsk, Russia
[2] Kuzbass Inst Fed Penitentiary Serv Russia, Novokuznetsk, Russia
来源
关键词
criminology; middle-range theory; object of criminology; method of criminology; social and legal science; school of thought;
D O I
10.17223/15617793/457/30
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The article discusses the criteria for classifying middle-range theories in criminology. The middle-range theory was developed by the American sociologist Robert Merton in his Social Theory and Social Structure. The article aims to analyze the specifics of applying the criteria of the middle-range theory to criminological research. General (analysis, synthesis, systemic-structural) and specific (biographical analysis, statistical analysis, comparative historical analysis, expert assessment) methods were used in the study. As a result of the study, the following conclusions were obtained. The developing nature of criminology is due to the fact that its object and place in the system of legal and social sciences are not clearly defined; criminology has no independent research methods and uses methods developed in other sciences, primarily sociology and statistics. Scientific schools in criminology are possible as they employ various and unique approaches to the study of its object, specific methodologies for studying particular problems, and have founders and followers of such approaches. The systems approach used in the study allowed the authors to consider the place of criminological research in social sciences and to determine other criteria of middle-range theories in criminology. These criteria include: the attribution of criminology to social and legal sciences; conclusions about specific phenomena or their specific aspects (rather than about all elements of the object of criminology) in these theories; attribution of some research to an intermediate link in scientific knowledge. Criminology is classified as a social science because of its subject matter, which includes such social phenomena as crime, the determinants of crime, the identity of the criminal, and crime prevention, as well as its methods developed by other social sciences. The attribution of criminology to legal sciences is due to the fact that its main object of study is crime, consisting of offences defined by the criminal law. Criminological middle-range theories do not contain conclusions about all elements of the object of criminology; they contain the results of studies of certain types of crime, the identity of the offender, the determinants of crime, crime prevention. The fact that a number of studies occupy an intermediate place in scientific knowledge means that middle-range theories are located between research on the most general issues of criminology and applied criminological research on a specific problem.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 260
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Middle-range theories as models: New criteria for analysis and evaluation
    Risjord, Mark
    [J]. NURSING PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [2] WHAT MIDDLE-RANGE THEORIES ARE
    BOUDON, R
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 1991, 20 (04) : 519 - 522
  • [3] Development of middle-range theories in nursing
    Leandro, Tania Alteniza
    Nunes, Marilia Mendes
    Teixeira, Iane Ximenes
    de Oliveira Lopes, Marcos Venicios
    de Araujo, Thelma Leite
    Teixeira Lima, Francisca Elisangela
    da Silva, Viviane Martins
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2020, 73 (01)
  • [4] Middle-Range Theories of Institutional Change
    Nee, Victor
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2018, 33 (04) : 845 - 854
  • [5] A dynamic and multifunctional account of middle-range theories
    Kaidesoja, Tuukka
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 70 (04): : 1469 - 1489
  • [6] Middle-range theories of land system change
    Meyfroid, P.
    Chowdhury, R. Roy
    de Bremond, A.
    Ellis, E. C.
    Erb, K-H.
    Filatova, T.
    Garrett, R. D.
    Grove, J. M.
    Heinimann, A.
    Kuemmerle, T.
    Kull, C. A.
    Lambin, E. F.
    Landon, Y.
    de Warow, Y. le Polain
    Messerli, P.
    Mueller, D.
    Nielsen, J. O.
    Peterson, G. D.
    Garcia, V. Rodriguez
    Schluter, M.
    Turner, B. L., II
    Verburg, P. H.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 53 : 52 - 67
  • [7] Theory Development Strategies for Middle-Range Theories
    Im, Eun-Ok
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2018, 41 (03) : 275 - 292
  • [8] The quest for middle-range theories in German public law
    Lepsius, Oliver
    [J]. ICON-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2014, 12 (03): : 692 - 709
  • [9] Building middle-range theories from case studies
    Kaidesoja, Tuukka
    [J]. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2019, 78 : 23 - 31
  • [10] Theorizing in the context of professional practice: the case for middle-range theories
    Green, Stuart D.
    Schweber, Libby
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2008, 36 (06): : 649 - 654