Hypoglycaemia;
Breast feeding;
Guideline;
Protocol;
SKIN-TO-SKIN;
TERM INFANTS BORN;
METABOLIC ADAPTATION;
CLINICAL-PRACTICE;
BLOOD GLUCOSE;
BRAIN-INJURY;
BIRTH;
DEFINITION;
RISK;
BABY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.midw.2014.04.004
中图分类号:
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号:
1011 ;
摘要:
Objective: to establish how well postnatal ward neonatal hypoglycaemia guidelines facilitate breast Feeding and adhere to UNICEF UK Baby Friendly Initiative (BFI) recommendations, and to compare compliance with different recommendations. Design: an appraisal of guidelines obtained via email survey using a UNICEF UK BFI checklist tool. Information about Baby Friendly Health/Hospital Initiative (BFHI) accreditation status was obtained by email questionnaire. Setting: tertiary neonatal centres in Australia and New Zealand. Participants: 22 guidelines were returned from 23 centres eligible to participate. Findings: guidelines generally scored poorly. On a scale ranging from 31 to 124 of overall guideline quality, the median score was 71. On a scale of 9 to 36 for adherence to recommendations to facilitate breast feeding, the median guideline score was 20. Compliance with the recommendation to promote skin-to-skin contact and early breast feeding was poor across all centres, achieving a score of 59 out of 88. Nine of 22 guidelines mentioned skin-to-skin contact after birth and 14 advised feeding within one hour of birth. The recommendation about discussing artificial milk supplementation with parents received a score 0144 out of 88. Fourteen guidelines listed Large for Gestational Age (LGA) infants to be at risk of hypoglycaemia. Few guidelines included up-to-date references or flowcharts. Key conclusions: guidelines need to recommend early skin-to-skin contact and discussion with parents before artificial milk supplementation. Guidelines suggest LGA neonates are being screened unnecessarily. Implications for practice: guidelines need constant revision as evidence for best practice expands. The UNICEF UK BFI checklist provides a readily available quality improvement tool. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机构:
Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Alison, Jennifer
McKeough, Zoe
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
McKeough, Zoe
Johnston, Kylie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, Physiotherapy Discipline, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Johnston, Kylie
McNamara, Renae
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
McNamara, Renae
Spencer, Lissa
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Spencer, Lissa
Jenkins, Sue
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Physiotherapy Dept, Perth, WA, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Jenkins, Sue
Hill, Catherine
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Austin Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Hill, Catherine
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
McDonald, Vanessa
Frith, Peter
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Daw Pk, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Frith, Peter
Caferella, Paul
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Daw Pk, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Sydney, NSW, Australia