Microvascular Effects of Heart Rate Control With Esmolol in Patients With Septic Shock: A Pilot Study

Objective: beta-blocker therapy may control heart rate and attenuate the deleterious effects of beta-stimulating catecholamines in septic shock. However, their negative chronotropy and inotropy may potentially lead to an inappropriately low cardiac output, with a subsequent compromise of microvascular blood flow. The purpose of the present pilot study was to investigate the effects of reducing heart rate to less than 95 beats per minute in patients with septic shock using the beta-1 adrenoceptor blocker, esmolol, with specific focus on systemic hemodynamics and the microcirculation. Design: Prospective, observational clinical study. Setting: Multidisciplinary ICU at a university hospital. Measurements and Main Results: After 24 hours of initial hemodynamic optimization, 25 septic shock patients with a heart rate greater than or equal to 95 beats per minute and requiring -norepinephrine to maintain mean arterial pressure greater than or equal to 65 mm Hg received a titrated esmolol infusion to maintain heart rate less than 95 beats per minute. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 24 hours after esmolol administration. Heart rates targeted between 80 and 94 beats per minute were achieved in all patients. Whereas cardiac index decreased (4.0 [3.5; 5.3] vs 3.1 [2.6; 3.9] L/min/m(2); p < 0.001), stroke volume remained unchanged (34 [37; 47] vs 40 [31; 46] mL/beat/m(2); p = 0.32). Microcirculatory blood flow in small vessels increased (2.8 [2.6; 3.0] vs 3.0 [3.0; 3.0]; p = 0.002), while the heterogeneity index decreased (median 0.06 [interquartile range 0; 0.21] vs 0 [0; 0]; p = 0.002). Pao(2) and pH increased while Paco(2) decreased (all p < 0.05). Of note, norepinephrine requirements were significantly reduced by selective beta-1 blocker therapy (0.53 [0.29; 0.96] vs 0.41 [0.22; 0.79] mu g/kg/min; p = 0.03). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated that heart rate control by a titrated esmolol infusion in septic shock patients was associated with maintenance of stroke volume, preserved microvascular blood flow, and a reduction in norepinephrine requirements.