What educational resources do students need to meet California's educational content standards? A textual analysis of California's educational content standards and their implications for basic educational conditions and resources

被引:6
|
作者
Koski, WS [1 ]
Weis, HA [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Law, Youth & Educ Law Project, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD | 2004年 / 106卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00421.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article examines the statutory and policy framework for California's standards-based reform and accountability scheme and argues that this scheme, not unlike others throughout the country, fails to ensure that all children are provided with the necessary resources and conditions to achieve at the high levels prescribed by the state's content standards. Although California has developed a comprehensive standards-based reform scheme that includes challenging educational content standards, curriculum frameworks tied to those standards, and accountability mechanisms that are based on performance on standards-based assessments, the state has never attempted to ascertain the basic educational resources and conditions to which all children should have access in order to achieve at the level of the state's content standards. In an effort to begin to fill that missing policy link, the article then summarizes a systematic analysis of the text of California's educational content standards and supporting materials, which analysis demonstrates that the state itself expects that children will have access to certain educational resources and conditions in four areas-facilities, technology, instructional materials, and teachers. Striking among the conclusions of the analysis is the extent to which California requires that children have access to modern technology, including computers, software, and the Internet. Less surprising, but no less important, is the extent to which the state's content standards assume that all children have access to quality facilities and instructional materials, ranging from laboratory equipment and sophisticated measuring instruments to well-stocked libraries and media centers. The article concludes by calling on the state to analyze its own content standards and curriculum frameworks to develop a complete basket of educational resources and conditions that all children should receive to have an opportunity to achieve the state's standards.
引用
收藏
页码:1907 / 1935
页数:29
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] User-Generated Content's Impact on the Sustainability of Open Educational Resources
    Ganapathi, Janani
    [J]. OPEN PRAXIS, 2019, 11 (02): : 211 - 225
  • [3] Do parents and siblings serve as educational resources? How and what extent family capital contributes to children's educational aspirations, self-concept and educational attainment
    Grgic, Mariana
    Bayer, Michael
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR FAMILIENFORSCHUNG, 2015, 27 (02): : 173 - 192
  • [4] A content analysis of medication adherence material in patient educational resources about gout
    Emad, Yasaman
    Derksen, Christina
    Petrie, Keith J.
    Dalbeth, Nicola
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY ADVANCES IN PRACTICE, 2024, 8 (02)
  • [5] NCLB's supplemental educational services: Is this what our students need?
    Ascher, Carol
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2006, 88 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [6] Online educational resources in paediatric and adolescent rheumatology- what's new?
    Lemon, Jennifer
    Close, Rosie
    Dobson, Gabrielle
    Maxey, Kate
    May, Joanne
    McLaughlin, Diarmuid
    Rajarathinam, Indhuja
    Saadalla, Sarra
    Yeo, Liching
    Watson, Pippa A.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 63
  • [7] Examining the Representations of NOS in Educational Resources: An Analysis of Lesson Plans Aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards
    Summers, Ryan
    Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad
    [J]. SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2019, 28 (3-5) : 269 - 289
  • [8] Academic Librarians Examination of University Students' and Faculty's Perceptions of Open Educational Resources
    Fischer, Lane
    Belikov, Olga
    Ikahihifo, Tarah K.
    Hilton, John, III
    Wiley, David
    Martin, M. Troy
    [J]. OPEN PRAXIS, 2020, 12 (03): : 399 - 415
  • [9] The four 'R's of openness and ALMS analysis: frameworks for open educational resources
    Hilton, John, III
    Wiley, David
    Stein, Jared
    Johnson, Aaron
    [J]. OPEN LEARNING, 2010, 25 (01): : 37 - 44
  • [10] What Do Students Think About Learning Supported by e-Schools Digital Educational Resources?
    Hajdin, Goran
    Vukovac, Dijana Plantak
    Oreski, Dijana
    [J]. LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES, LCT 2023, PT I, 2023, 14040 : 274 - 291