Analysis of cost comparison and effects of change orders during construction: Study of a mass timber and a concrete building project

被引:40
|
作者
Ahmed, Shafayet [1 ]
Arocho, Ingrid [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Sch Civil & Construct Engn, 101 Kearney Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
Construction; Mass timber building; Concrete building; Cost assessment; Change orders; CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER; IMPACT; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101856
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In recent years, timber has been considered as an alternative source of building material because of its sustainability and design efficiency. However, the cost competitiveness of timber buildings is still under study due to the lack of available cost information. This paper presents a comprehensive cost comparative analysis of a mass timber building mainly developed with cross-laminated timber (CLT). The actual construction cost of the project is compared with the modeled cost of the same building designed as a concrete option. The result shows that the construction cost of timber building is 6.43% higher than the modeled concrete building. The study further investigated the change orders associated with the project and found that the total cost of change orders contributed 5.62% to the final construction cost of mass timber building. The study is helpful to provide insight into the construction cost of typical mass timber buildings. It also can be used as a guide for the project owners to make decisions regarding their initial investments on a mass timber project.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost Analysis of a Mass Timber Building Project: Comparison of Budgeted and Actual Construction Cost
    Ahmed, Shafayet
    Arocho, Ingrid
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2022: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND DELIVERY, CONTRACTS, AND DESIGN AND MATERIALS, 2022, : 493 - 501
  • [2] Comparison of Building Construction and Life-Cycle Cost for a High-Rise Mass Timber Building with its Concrete Alternative
    Gu, Hongmei
    Liang, Shaobo
    Bergman, Richard
    [J]. FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2020, 70 (04) : 482 - 492
  • [3] Analysis on building construction project cost
    Liu, Yilin
    Lu, Mei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, MANAGEMENT AND HUMANITIES SCIENCE (ETMHS 2015), 2015, 27 : 1327 - 1331
  • [4] A development cost comparison between a multi-storey mass timber and reinforced concrete building in South Africa
    Van der Westhuyzen, S.
    Wium, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 63 (04) : 35 - 44
  • [5] Model for Quantifying the Impact of Change Orders on Project Cost for US Roadwork Construction
    Serag, Engy
    Oloufa, Amr
    Malone, Linda
    Radwan, Essam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2010, 136 (09): : 1015 - 1027
  • [6] Emission of particulate matters during construction: A comparative study on a Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) and a steel building construction project
    Ahmed, Shafayet
    Arocho, Ingrid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2019, 22 : 281 - 294
  • [7] Identification and Evaluation of Causes and Effects of Change Orders in Building Construction Projects
    Pourrostam, Towhid
    Ismail, Amiruddin
    Mansournejad, Mahmood
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 94-96 : 2261 - +
  • [8] Greenhouse gas emissions during timber and concrete building construction - A scenario based comparative case study
    Sandanayake, Malindu
    Lokuge, Weena
    Zhang, Guomin
    Setunge, Sujeeva
    Thushar, Quddus
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 38 : 91 - 97
  • [9] Mass timber construction as an alternative to concrete and steel in the Australia building industry: a PESTEL evaluation of the potential
    Kremer, P. D.
    Symmons, M. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL WOOD PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2015, 6 (03) : 138 - 147
  • [10] Dynamic analysis of the Cardington concrete building during construction
    Canisius, TDG
    Ellis, BR
    [J]. STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 877 - 882