Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia

被引:622
|
作者
Walsh, TJ
Teppler, H
Donowitz, GR
Maertens, JA
Baden, LR
Dmoszynska, A
Cornely, OA
Bourque, MR
Lupinacci, RJ
Sable, CA
dePauw, BE
机构
[1] NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA USA
[3] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Charlottesville, VA USA
[4] Univ Ziekenhuis Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Clin Hosp 4, Lublin, Poland
[8] Univ Cologne Klinikum, Cologne, Germany
[9] Univ Hosp St Radboud, Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2004年 / 351卷 / 14期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa040446
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent fever and neutropenia often receive empirical therapy with conventional or liposomal amphotericin B for the prevention and early treatment of invasive fungal infections. Caspofungin, a member of the new echinocandin class of compounds, may be an effective alternative that is better tolerated than amphotericin B. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multinational trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of caspofungin as compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy. At study entry, patients were stratified according to risk and according to whether they had previously received antifungal prophylaxis. A successful outcome was defined as the fulfillment of all components of a five-part composite end point. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 1095 patients (556 receiving caspofungin and 539 receiving liposomal amphotericin B). After adjustment for strata, the overall success rates were 33.9 percent for caspofungin and 33.7 percent for liposomal amphotericin B (95.2 percent confidence interval for the difference, -5.6 to 6.0 percent), fulfilling statistical criteria for the noninferiority of caspofungin. Among patients with baseline fungal infections, a higher proportion of those treated with caspofungin had a successful outcome (51.9 percent vs. 25.9 percent, P=0.04). The proportion of patients who survived at least seven days after therapy was greater in the caspofungin group (92.6 percent vs. 89.2 percent, P=0.05). Premature study discontinuation occurred less often in the caspofungin group than in the amphotericin B group (10.3 percent vs. 14.5 percent, P=0.03). The rates of breakthrough fungal infections and resolution of fever during neutropenia were similar in the two groups. Fewer patients who received caspofungin sustained a nephrotoxic effect (2.6 percent vs. 11.5 percent, P<0.001), an infusion-related event (35.1 percent vs. 51.6 percent, P<0.001), or a drug-related adverse event or discontinued therapy because of drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Caspofungin is as effective as and generally better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B when given as empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1402
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CASPOFUNGIN VERSUS LIPOSOMAL AMPHOTERICIN B FOR EMPIRICAL ANTIFUNGAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT FEVER AND NEUTROPENIA IN SWEDEN
    Lundberg, J.
    Naik, S.
    Kumar, R.
    Sjolin, J.
    Jansen, J.
    [J]. HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 95 : 194 - 194
  • [2] Economic evaluation of caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia in Sweden
    Naik, Shalini
    Lundberg, Johan
    Kumar, Ritesh
    Sjolin, Jan
    Jansen, Jeroen P.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 43 (6-7) : 504 - 514
  • [3] Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever
    Vazquez, Lourdes
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE QUIMIOTERAPIA, 2016, 29 : 3 - 5
  • [4] Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia
    Walsh, TJ
    Finberg, RW
    Arndt, C
    Hiemenz, J
    Schwartz, C
    Bodensteiner, D
    Pappas, P
    Seibel, N
    Greenberg, RN
    Dummer, S
    Schuster, M
    Holcenberg, JS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10): : 764 - 771
  • [5] Voriconazole compared with liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever.
    Walsh, TJ
    Pappas, P
    Winston, DJ
    Lazarus, HM
    Petersen, F
    Raffalli, J
    Yanovich, S
    Stiff, P
    Greenberg, R
    Donowitz, G
    Lee, J
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (04): : 225 - 234
  • [6] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy for neutropenic fever
    Wingard, John R.
    Leather, Helen L.
    Wood, Craig A.
    Gerth, William C.
    Lupinacci, Robert J.
    Berger, Marc L.
    Mansley, Edward C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2007, 64 (06) : 637 - 643
  • [7] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of Caspofungin Versus Liposomal Amphotericin B for Empiric Antifungal Therapy in Pediatric Patients With Persistent Fever and Neutropenia
    Maertens, Johan A.
    Madero, Luis
    Reilly, Anne F.
    Lehrnbecher, Thomas
    Groll, Andreas H.
    Jafri, Hasan S.
    Green, Michael
    Nania, Joseph J.
    Bourque, Michael R.
    Wise, Beth Ann
    Strohmaier, Kim M.
    Taylor, Arlene F.
    Kartsonis, Nicholas A.
    Chow, Joseph W.
    Arndt, Carola A. S.
    dePauw, Ben E.
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2010, 29 (05) : 415 - 420
  • [8] Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy
    Kontoyiannis, DP
    Lewis, RE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (04): : 410 - 410
  • [9] Voriconazole versus liposomal amphotericin B in patients with neutropenia and persistent fever.
    Powers, JH
    Dixon, CA
    Goldberger, MJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (04): : 289 - 290
  • [10] Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy - Reply
    Walsh, TJ
    Donowitz, GR
    dePauw, BE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (04): : 413 - 414